Common Law Grand Jury: Article Analysis

Improved Essays
Definition
The common law was originally developed in historical England and is the result of judicial decisions that were based in tradition, custom, and precedent (Satterlee, 2014, p. 86).
Summary
The article “Oregon Occupiers Call for Common Law Grand Jury” written by Steve Almasy and Sara Weisfeldt, CNN states that Ammon Bundy, the man leading a group of armed protesters who have taken over a federal wildlife refuge in Oregon, called for a common law grand jury to examine what he called violations of the U.S. Constitution. He considers the U.S. Constitution to be violated due to failing to protect the citizens of the county. Bundy and many others have been protesting the sentencing of Dwight Hammond and his son Steven, who have been convicted

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the murder case of A Jury Of Her Peers written by Susan Glaspell, Mrs. Wright stolidly tells Mr. Hale and Mr. Peters that her spouse is dead. The men along with their wives work together to solve the murder of Mr. Wright. Although Mrs. Wright does not initially appear capable of murder, Mrs. Peters and Mr. Hale conclude she strangled her husband as evidenced by the crazily sewn quilt patch, the unhinged bird cage, and the mutilated canary. First, the quilt patch was much messier than Mrs. Wright’s usual neat work.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Professor of Law at George Mason University wrote an article about the jury nullification in the Washington Post. In it he focuses of various aspects that make this process so interesting and contradicting. The author give his personal view on jury nullification and his initial attitude toward it. Jury nullification can be seen as a two edged sword, because it is not applied on constant and consistent basis. The author, Ilya Somin agrees that it can curb unjust laws, however it can backfire.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Overall, Proposition 36 has definitely changed how the justice system deals with drug related cases. Having researched both negative and positive factors of this program, it has become clear that Proposition 36 can be effective. However, only to those who are fully committed and wanting to change their lives. With the program being more of a mandated option by the courts, many individuals take the program, only to avoid jail time. Therefore, these individuals are not ready or not willing to comply with the rules that come along with the program.…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Australian Legal System

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order to support this idea, the history of the Australian legal system should be discussed. Australia is a common law country and the history of the Australian legal system stems from English common law system.2 Common law is judge made laws that are created based around areas that are not included. The judges are required to interpret legislation if there is a dispute about the meaning or how to apply an Act in a case. These interpretations then become part of the common law.3…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Critical Review: The Common Place of Law The Common Place of Law is an interesting empirical research of legal consciousness that is actually a very strong logical theory, in which law is recognized as both constituting and being constituted by social relations and cultural practice. The question that Ewick and Silbey spawn their theory from comes from the classic question, “how is the law experienced” rather than “what is the law,” this was a very compellingly argument made by Ewick and Silbey. The latter question that I saw arise from their argument was from where did most of the classic legal theory and jurisprudence; and did they spring from the subset question “how is the law experienced”. Seeing that law is not something that only exist and can be studied, but law is created by the process of inquiry and definition.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There have been many influences on Canadian law including Hammurabi, Mosaic, and Roman. Britain has had the most influence on Canadian law. Although there have been many influences on Canada 's legal system, Britain has had the most impact for reasons such as Trial by Combat and Ordeal, Common Law, Rule of Law and the British North American Act of 1867. The impact that the Hammurabi laws have had on Canada 's legal system today is that the laws are known, along with the hierarchy of laws.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    On Thursday, November 12th, I visited the Fredericksburg General District Court of the 15th Judicial District of Virginia to observe cases beginning at 9:30 a.m. in Fredericksburg, Virginia. The Virginia General District Court is the lowest level of the Virginia court system and is the most common court citizens of Virginia have contact with. The General District Court is a limited jurisdiction trial court that conducts trials involving traffic infractions and other criminal misdemeanor offenses, hears civil cases involving amounts of under $25,000, and holds preliminary hearings in felony cases. They do not conduct jury trials and all cases are heard and decided by the judge. There are 32 judicial districts of the General District Court serving…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry David Thoreau once said, “That government is best which governs least," this statement is true because the more the government is involved, the more complicated life becomes for the people of the United States. In the New York Times article, “A Defiant Rancher Savors the Audience That Rallied to His side”, author Adam Nagourney wrote about a rancher named Cliven Bundy who has been grazing his cattle on public land in Nevada since 1993, and his family has done the same since 1870. There has been no issues with grazing on public land in the past, but since The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has changed the rules on using the public land, Cliven Bundy is being fined. Bundy owes more than $1 million in fines for the reason that he refuses…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I would like to look into the Anglo-Saxon ideals of widows in the 9th and 10th century, more specifically the forfeiture of her property if she desires to re-marry. B. My questions to ask would be, can a women sell/trade the property she received as a morning gift? If so, are there any example of this where she traded her land to her soon to be husband and or close relative, as a means of lawfully “cheating the system” and how was this viewed by society?…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Article 5 Analysis

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Article 5 of the Constitution demonstrates that in order for a convention consisting of structural modifications to the Constitution, two-thirds of the states dictate to call a convention, whereas amendment to the Constitution requires the approval of thirty-eight states. According to New York Times Correspondent Michael Wine’s in his news article Inside the Conservative Push for States to Amend the Constitution, Republicans are striving to meet the requirements of Article 5. The overall argument of the Republicans is justified by their desire to enforce a balanced federal budget. The new article translates a few conservatives favoring the convention, the general improvement of the Republican’s request, and the opposition. To begin, former presidential candidates, John Kasich and Jeb Bush, who are involved in the Republican platform, support the convention.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Court Cases

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On November 22, 2016, I sat in courtroom 507 of the Fresno County Superior Court, under the Honorable Judge Timothy Kams. Judge Kams was conducting a jury selection for a jury trial dealing with a felony DUI case. During the jury selection, I witnessed a Venire. A venire or jury pool, is a master list or jury list, from which a petit panel is selected, typically is based on names drawn from voter registration lists or lists of licensed drivers over eighteen years of age (Lippmann, 2014, p.518). I also witnessed a Voir Dire.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a criminal trial, a jury is a group usually comprised of twelve randomly chosen adults, whose role is to hear evidence, apply the law as directed by the judge, and then collectively decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the crime they have been accused of, based only on the facts given. Juries have played a significant role in Australia’s justice system for quite some time, though in more recent years the role of juries has been reduced. In 2011, the NSW government changed the law so that accused persons could apply for judge alone trials and, with consent from the Director of Public, avoid juries entirely (Whitbourn 2013). Currently there is much debate as to whether or not the jury system should be scrapped entirely for criminal trials in NSW.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In most nations, including the United States, constitutional law is predicated on the text of a document ratified at the time the nation came into being. Sources of law come from customs, religion, Judicial Decisions, scientific commentaries, equality and legislation. Religion and law is so combined that the rules of life have religious…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The formation of the group is more in task orientation which all twelve jurors have common goal to be achieved. In the movie, the jurors are choice based on difference background and experience and the reason for the teams form is to fulfil his civic duty and social responsibility. The jurors have no relationships between each and other and they will not retain any relationship after the trial. It clearly show the negotiation process is a one off with served the short term purpose. The decision style is more analytical which…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout the early 1900’s, women were viewed by society as inferior to men. Those of the female sex were expected to cook, clean, and only speak when spoken to. Susan Glaspell criticizes these concepts in one of the most well known forms of feminist literature, “A Jury of Her Peers”. The story’s central point focuses on the murder of John Wright committed by his wife Minnie as the Hales and the Peters investigate the crime scene. Despite the women finding valuable evidence substantiating the crime, their husbands viewed their discoveries as petty trifles that only women worry about.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays