King Henry And King Lear

Improved Essays
Similarities between four characters and two families are prevalent throughout William Shakespeare’s King Henry and King Lear. The similarities between the characters and families shows how both plays can be compared in terms of character function, theme, and plot device. The comparisons demonstrate King Henry and King Lear’s demanding attributes, King Lear’s knight and Hotspur’s ability to recognize that their friends are not being treated respectfully, and the beginnings of feuds between the Percy family against King Henry and Goneril against King Lear. King Henry and King Lear parallel each other regarding their egotistical attitude as they both rudely command others around. King Henry commands Worcester to “get thee gone”(KH 1.3.14), …show more content…
This shows how King Henry is self-centered as he rudely orders Worcester to get out. King Henry also says to Worcester, “you have good leave to us: when we need your use and counsel, we shall send for you” (KH 1.3.19-20), implying that Worcester must leave, and whenever King Henry needs Worcester, he will just call for him to come. This too demonstrates how King Henry believes he is the center of the world as he can command people to leave, and then when he feels he needs someone to come he will order them to come to his aid. Similarly, King Lear asks Oswald who he is and Oswald replies “my lady’s father” (KL 1.4.81). This infuriates King Lear as he expects everyone to refer to him as King even though he no longer holds power. He curses at Oswald calling him a “whoreson dog”, “slave”, and “cur” (KL 1.4.83) which shows how self-centered he is because he insults someone when they do not respect him as he would like to be …show more content…
Hotspur is furious at King Henry for calling Mortimer a traitor. Hotspur stands up for Mortimer by saying, “nor never could the noble Mortimer receive so many...let him not be slandered with revolt” (KH 1.3. 108-110) showing how Hotspur is being a loyal friend to Mortimer as he calls him noble and believes that he should not be pressed with treason. By King Lear’s knight mentioning to King Lear that he believes “there’s a great abatement of kindness… in the general dependants as in the duke himself also, and [his] daughter” (KL 1.4.60-62) demonstrates how he is looking out for King Lear. The knight is concerned that the servants, Goneril, and the Duke of Albany are treating him with a lack of respect, thus, they are not treating King Lear like a friend which worries the knight. By both Hotspur and King Lear’s knight sticking up for their friends, it shows how they are similar in that they are being loyal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    How does Shakespeare use symmetry, in which scenes or even people seem to be slightly altered reflecting the other scenes or people in order to make his point? In addition to the political quarrels, William Shakespeare has depicted several comparisons between characters and settings to mirror situations in Henry IV. King Henry has juxtaposed Hal and Hotspur, Hal enjoys diversions and humour whereas Hotspur is exhibited in a serious manner. Contrasted again, Hotspur is the epitome of honour contracting to Falstaff who believes honour is nothing.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Shakespeare’s 1 King Henry IV, the three main settings: the castle, tavern, and the battlefield, are used to represent very different lifestyles, which all play a vital role in the portrayal of certain themes within the play. The castle is normally associated with King Henry, duty, and power, whereas the tavern is populated by drunks, low-lives, and lackluster endeavors. It is also where Hal spends the majority of his time. These two setting cause major conflict between Hal and King Henry as well as blur the true honorability of Hal. The battlefield is where the tavern and castle come into contact and characteristics of both are displayed in a new way.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This idea is conveyed in act 1 scene 3 when Hotspur talks to King Henry about Mortimers capture. Shakespeare represents King Henry…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry 4 Protagonist

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A compelling debate has been ignited as a result of Shakespeare’s play Henry the Fourth, Part One. The play’s protagonist seems to be unclear and thus many critics have drawn their own conclusions. Anne Marie McNamara explains her point of view in her essay Henry IV: The King as Protagonist. While McNamara claims that King Henry IV is the protagonist of the play, Prince Hal is the true protagonist because a major portion of the play focuses on the idea of Prince Hal becoming king.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Demonstrated in Act 1 Scene 1 when his youngest yet sweetest daughter (Cordelia) says: “I cannot heave my heart into my mouth” in response to King Lear’s demand for adoration. As a result, King Lear’s inability to recognise her love chooses to banish her and anyone who opposes his decision, emphasising that his pride has distorted his judgements. On top of this, King Lear’s distorted judgements are reiterated when he imperatively commands his loyal subsidiary to get “Out of my sight!”. This supports the statement that King Lear’s pride has affected his decision-making as he banishes his most loyal subsidiary after warning him to not disown Cordelia. Furthermore, in the sub-plot of “King Lear” scenes of pride are demonstrated when the earl of Lear called Gloucester, is approached by his bastard son with a forged letter supposedly composed by his innocent elder son.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This pact allows the identities of these characters to develop parallel to each other as they work for a common purpose. They also force the identities of people loyal to Lear and Gloucester such as Kent and Cordelia to adapt to the hostile environment in which they occupy. These characters develop into the protagonists of the play as they become the victims of injustice in King Lear. Another form of injustice in King lear is the race for power and the treasonous behavior many of the characters use to gain power. Again, we see Lear being betrayed by his “loving daughters” Goneril and Reagan.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Which of you shall we say doth love us most?” (I.i.53). At the beginning of King Lear a competitive scenario immediately takes place. King Lear asks his daughters to express their love for him in exchange for land. After dividing his land between only Goneril and Regan, he believes that he will still retain power, that is not the case.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the entirety of Henry IV Part 1, by William Shakespeare, there is an emphasis on father-son relationships. The main protagonist, Hal, and the main antagonist, Hotspur, are both young men and as such they are still learning from their respective father figures. In Hal’s case, both Falstaff and his biological father King Henry IV, and for Hotspur, Northumberland. Each relationship has its merits and faults, and its own intricacies not seen in any of the other bonds. Though the the plot centers mainly around Hal and the king, each out these links are integral to understanding what happened and why.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    King Lear Flaws

    • 2365 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In act one, during the division of the kingdom, Lear becomes furious when his youngest and favourite daughter, Cordelia, does not over exaggerate her love for her father. Lear then begins to rage in fury at Cordelia by disowning her. Kent then steps in saying, “Royal Lear, / Whom I have ever honour’d as my king, / Lov’d as my father, as my master…

    • 2365 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli, author of The Prince, once wrote, “Everyone sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are”. Machiavelli, one whose name is synonymous with manipulation and trickery, argues that an individual should do whatever he/she deems necessary to keep power. During his time, his policies shocked the world; however, upon further examination, Machiavelli simply states a trait of human nature. The idea of deceitful autocratic rule has been present in the form of hierarchies and dictatorships and is even seen in 1 Henry IV, which is set 200 years before the creation of Machiavelli’s The Prince. Through masking one’s self, one exploits and deceives though at the cost of one’s morals and virtues.…

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the play progresses, the characters’ actions portray how misjudgments influence them to choose a destructive path. Edmund, the illegitimate son of Gloucester, Regan, and Goneril, the daughters of King Lear, use these misjudgments for their personal self gain. Edmund desires…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The wise fool described by Erasmus is someone who can see past the chaos of the material world and find greater truths in their madness. Characters within King Lear that exhibit the qualities of the wise fool: selflessness and loyalty, in their search for the truth and the treatment of others, find greater clarity in their decision-making, a factor crucial to their standing at the climax of the work. The characters may be classified into two categories, those who stay loyal to Lear through his descent into madness, and those betray him in their schemes of self-interest. Members of each category face similar situations and react differently based on allegiances and ambitions. The first comparison to examine is between Regan’s avoidance of, and…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is shown through the use of verse and hyperbole of “I love you more than word can wield the matter” where the greed for land is what drives Goneril to say nice words.. However, the irony of lear failing to differentiate authenticity or deception of love results in misjudging Cordelia for feigned love, instigating social, personal and self-conflicts for both lear, his daughters and the society. This plot drive will not only foreshadow complications but also result in the sacrifice of Cordelia and Gloucester. Shakespeare’s use of epiphany of Lear, is shown by misperceiving Goneril’s love with flattery which is portrayed through Goneril’s plosive language, contrasting the poetic language in verse present in the division of the kingdom, exemplifying Goneril’s greed for land the deceptive love expressed for Lear. This parallels with the double plot of Gloucester…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kent is aware of what it truly means to be a loyal servant, and he holds a passionate belief in upholding honesty. Kent harbors anger in his words when he states “that such a slave as this should wear a sword, who wears no honesty” (2.2. 74-75). His protection of Lear does not cease throughout the play. When Gloucester arrives, Kent tells him that King Lear is here, but Kent begs Gloucester to “trouble him not, [because] his wits are gone” (3.6.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Flaws In King Lear

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Although people like Kent and The Fool try to advise Lear of his mistakes, he ignores them and takes pride in his actions, not listening to the people around him or accepting his mistakes. Lear’s actions later bite him in the back as Goneril and Regan begin to plan their revenge on Lear after finding out Cordelia was his favourite daughter: “He always loved our sister most, and with what poor / judgement he hath now cast her off appears too grossly” (1.1.291-93). Both Goneril and…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays