Manipulation In Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince

Niccolò Machiavelli, author of The Prince, once wrote, “Everyone sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are”. Machiavelli, one whose name is synonymous with manipulation and trickery, argues that an individual should do whatever he/she deems necessary to keep power. During his time, his policies shocked the world; however, upon further examination, Machiavelli simply states a trait of human nature. The idea of deceitful autocratic rule has been present in the form of hierarchies and dictatorships and is even seen in 1 Henry IV, which is set 200 years before the creation of Machiavelli’s The Prince. Through masking one’s self, one exploits and deceives though at the cost of one’s morals and virtues. Similarly, in Shakespeare’s …show more content…
When Henry criticizes Hal, he says, “Which now doth that I would not have it do: / Make blind itself with foolish tenderness. / [weeping]” (3.2.90-93). These lines are particularly interesting for the reason that the reader is left unaware of whether or not Henry is being genuine or using the Machiavellian principles of manipulation to illicit an emotional response/change from Hal. The incorporation of stage directions, very uncommon for Shakespeare, illustrates Henry’s deception through acting. The choice of making him weep and not allowing Henry’s actions to be depicted as something else illustrates the cold calculating use of emotion to stir the feelings of Hal. Thus, Henry’s use of “skilled rhetoric and the appearance of morality, friendship… in order to manipulate others” (Johnston) dramatizes his attempt to secure power and his self-serving nature. Consequently, the use of the filial relationship to take advantage of his own son ultimately depicts human nature as power driven. Rather than truly connecting to his troubled son on a deep father and son level, Henry, as most Machiavels …show more content…
Thus, the Machiavel is the representation of human nature. The manifestation of Machiavellian principles within most of the characters emphasizes a necessity for the archetypical Machiavellian leader. As humans, people relate more so to that of a Machiavel than that of Hotspur, a highly honorable character. People sin, make mistakes, and ultimately act out of self-interest. Thus, one should embrace Machiavellian tendencies as it is a core element within the nature of mankind. The effectiveness of their rule and leadership in battle and within society highlights the vast superiority of Machiavellian leaders over leaders who value