Karl Marx's Theory Of Happiness In Society

Improved Essays
Happiness is an emotion that is typically explored by psychologists. This can be studied by sociologists too. Sociologists have developed theories that explain responses based on group dynamics. Karl Marx and C. Wright Mills both have a view on society based on the class system. Marx developed his theory based on power within the capitalist system. He believed classes existed and there were disparities in society and those inequalities deprived lower classes of materials and resources causing conflict (Krawford, 2009). Mills took it a step further and explained that there is an elite group of powerful individuals in society that occupy positions in bureaucratic organization and large institutions in industrial societies controlling the lower classes (Elwell, 2013). These theories are more key issues as to why happiness for individuals and groups are difficult to achieve.
Karl Marx focuses on the capitalist system. He deduced that classes existed, there were inequalities in these classes and the lower classes worked to serve the upper class thereby causing conflict. The upper capitalist class controls manufacturing and resources. The lower class, by comparison controls only their ability to sell their labor
…show more content…
Personal power is perceptually taken from the individual and controlled by an outside force that the individual has to fight with. This fight causes a division in the system where the capitalist is the aggressor and the labor class becomes enslaved. Since the upper class holds the power to control manufacturing, they control intellectual production as well. If knowledge is power, then those who control the knowledge have the power. Distrust in media and educational outlets becomes a vicious cycle where the lower class is fed manipulated information causing them to replicate the power that rules them (Krawford,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This German philosopher was in the midst of many revolutions throughout his time. At one point, he was known as the spokesman of the ‘Communist Party’ in 1848, which signifies the kind of involvement he was intervened within at the time. Although Marx was a member of a wealthy family in which he utilized to acquire good education, he was a philosopher who critiqued capitalism. Marx attacks the bourgeoisie families and individuals who happened to be property owners or factory occupants, and critiqued these families and individuals because he believed as property owners; they would need to hire people in order to operate the property. His idea of discarding the middle class was revealed in the third idea of his book The Communist Manifesto.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believes that the working class or proletariat needs to overthrow the bourgeoisie and that private property should be abolished (Marx 22-23). Abolishing private property would get rid of tension between classes. Owning private property is a capitalist idea therefore it needs to be abolished. Getting rid of private property gives more power to the working class and creates equality in the sense that no one individual is above one another. Also people would not be profiting off of private…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In every society there must be a ruling class and the oppressed classes, who obviously would have conflicting interests. Marx believed that there were three primary classes the aristocracy, the bourgeoisie,…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Human well-being defined, is a state where the pursuit of life, liberty, and property is unhindered. It is when people within a society are free to do as they like, as long as they do not harm others. According to this definition of human well-being, the philosophies of John Stuart Mill prove to be more important in the preservation of this state. The prohibition of individual liberties, proposed by Mill, seem to be more of a threat to human well-being than the economic conditions described by Karl Marx. The teachings of Marx are rooted in one core philosophy- that people cannot cohere to their species essence in a capitalist society.…

    • 1826 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Durkheim believed that society functioned, while Marx views saw the opposite. Marx (1996) viewed the world as a history of class struggle (1), meaning that the world does not function due to the fact that everyone strives to obtain power, thus causing inequalities among society. To begin with, Marx believed that society could be studied through material conditions, also known as materialism (Marx, 1989, 4). The…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He claimed that the proletariat all experienced a thing called the false consciousness, where they didn’t realize how exploited they were being by the bourgeoisie. Marx believed this would lead to conflict during a process called the dialectic. The dialectic is a cycle where there the present state of affairs (thesis) holds an opposing group within it (the antithesis), that eventually leads a conflict resulting in a new status quo (a…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was writing during the industrial revolution and because of this, many people were falling classes in society while a small group was rising in wealth. Marx believed this was wrong and unhealthy not only for the people themselves but the society as a whole. He believed that this evil was being inherently caused by capitalism. While capitalism was not helping the situation, I believe the industrial revolution and the rapid rise of the machines, along with unprepared governments with zero regulations, is a larger contributor to the formation of the proletariat and the bourgeoise. The lack of regulations let the owners of the companies force the workers to work beyond what was fair for little pay, and this caused them to not live fulfilling lives as they lived paycheck to paycheck.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In contrast, Marx believes that the cause of conflict in human nature is class division. Marx refers to the idea, throughout time, there have always been people at the very top of the economic class. He believes people who are at the very top control everything, while people at the bottom barely survive (p. 474). In terms of class division, Marx believes people make all of their decisions based on economics, and he states a way of life based purely on economics would eventually lead to the use of…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He divided the population into two groups: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The bourgeoisie was the ruling class; they own the means of production and, because of this, control the people. The proletariat operates the means of production, and is controlled by the bourgeoisie. Marx claimed that everyone fit into one of these groups. Marx’s two social classes are very apparent in Fahrenheit 451’s society.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sociological Theories

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The capitalist or bourgeois are the owners for the means of production and own the workers or proletariat’s. The proletariat or workers sell themselves in order to work for the bourgeois’s. He figured this would cause “social conflict”, but in reality he found that the bourgeois and proletariat’s work together and need each other in order to function. One can think about it like this, the driver for a big CEO hedge fund…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believed that we do not really choose what class we are born into, which in turn, coerces us into the forced division of labor. He believed that it was not possible to have inequality, to have capitalism, and still have a stable society because capitalism thrives off of exploitation. “The bourgeoisie cannot exist without constantly revolutionizing the instruments of production, and thereby the relations of…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Social Process theories just so happen to be my favorite type of theories throughout this entire course. It projects symbolic interactionism. Symbolic interactionism is the social behavior that occurs, which emphasizes the important role that language partakes in a community and children being social-able. Theories involved in social process theories are Ronald Aker’s social learning theory, social control theory, and the labeling theory.…

    • 1854 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conflict theory, on the other hand, focuses on how power structures inequality impact on people’s lives. Karl Marx analyses society in the 19th century and finding that society revolves around different stages namely feudalism, capitalism and socialism, thus coming up with that society is divided into the rich and poor he calls them the Bourgeoise and Proletariat, The Bourgeoise being the rich who own factories and capitalised on the profits and production whereas the Proletariat working class being the poor labour force earning wages from the rich owners who exploit them. The proletariat gets to a point of realisation of inequality of classes and wants a change then came about the middle classes who are in between the rich and poor and take on supervisory positions in factories. This shows no equality after a while, it still brings unhappiness to the poor labourers as they are still not in power, as the middle class and the rich are now all in power. Social order and Social changes are still creating instability among groups, this brings about the Conflict theory.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays