Bourgeoisie And Capitalism In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

Great Essays
In this essay I will discuss what the economic theorist, political theorist and social scientist Karl Marx (and to a minor degree Friedrich Engels) outline and explain in the Communist Manifesto in regards to the Bourgeoisie being responsible for the creation of their own grave-diggers and the pattern of class struggle that Marx sees developing under the Capitalist system. I will do this by first looking at how Marx views history previous to Modern Bourgeois society and the development of the Bourgeoisie and the flaws in his viewpoint, secondly looking at how the Capitalist system only appeared exploitative and was actually in its early stages when the Communist Manifesto was written and thirdly discuss Marx's theory that the Bourgeoisie will …show more content…
And with the development of the Bourgeoisie and Capitalism came the Proletariat. According to Marx, Proletarians live only as long as they can find work. And they can only do this as long as their labor increases capital. Marx writes of how Proletarians are a commodity who are vulnerable to all the fluctuations of the market. Due to the development of machines and the division of labor the Proletarians are viewed only as an appendage to a machine. Age and sex become less important as all people are viewed simply as instruments of labor. They are exploited by the Bourgeoisie and the capitalist system. The wage which the proletarian gets is also exploited by other Bourgeoisie. Such as property owners like landlords seeking rent. Marx continues to argue that without sufficient capital, and the coming of new technology that makes specialized skills no longer useful, other classes of society, such as trade people, sink into the lower strata of society. Into the …show more content…
In order for a class to be able to be oppressed its slavish existence must be sustainable. In contrast, laborers in modern industrial society are continually suffering a deterioration of their status. And in this industrial society they become poorer and poorer. The bourgeoisie are become unfit to rule due to the fact that they cannot guarantee "an existence to its slave within its slavery." Marx also declares that the Proletariat are connected by improved communication, and by the existence they share in common in which they are exploited. They are also in the majority in society, and their numbers continually increase. The most significant trait of the Proletariat according to Marx is that they have nothing to lose. They have no power or privileges they must defend. Instead, in order to help themselves they must destroy the entire Bourgeoisie system. Due to this, when the revolution of the Proletariat occurs they will destroy the entire system of class exploitation. This stage of history that Marx is describing is the last stage. Thus, with the development of Modern Industry, the Bourgeoisie produces "its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable.". Another concept developed by Prof. Schumpeter argued that capitalism, by fostering change and innovation, was a self-destructive, self-replacing, system. This was due to the fact that the market economy

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In what ways did the Industrial Age influence Karl Marx 's writing of the Communist Manifesto? “The Communist Manifesto” by Karl Mark and Frederic Engels was published 150 years ago in London in February of 1848 and is widely is regarded as one of the most influential and widely-read documents of the past two centuries. The main focal point of this essay is to target the major influences that the industrial age had on Marx’s writing of this documentation and how it affected its end product. This will be addressed by answering questions such as why it was written, what the manifesto consists of, any major influences that dictated its content and how it has helped shape our society today.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Communist Manifesto Marx and Engle’s led me to believe that the Proletariat’s do the work while the Bourgeoisie regulate their income and working environments. Bourgeoisie live in wealth and strive to live in a “classless society”. A classless society according to the Bourgeoisie was one with government controlled wages, benefits, and no private ownership. The relationship they share is a give and take type relationship. The proletariat’s gave while the Bourgeoisie’s took.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The new dominance of the bourgeoisie created a social class within the bourgeoisie, and thus the proletariat emerged (4-5). These “wage-laborers who, having no means of production of their own, are reduced to selling their labor power in order to live” (1). The creation of the proletariat was a necessary affect to bourgeoisie’s approaches of production- a superiority complex and divide for struggle naturally came about between the owners of the production and the working force (6). The bourgeois industries expanded and increased their own capital, leaving the lower class unable to compete; Now and then the workers are victorious, but only for a time” (6). This dissonance eventually caused corrosion within the structure of the proletariat, and this struggle created the revolutionary element which eventually destroyed the bourgeois oppressors: “What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, is its own grave-diggers.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carlyle Vs. Marx

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Workers in a capitalistic society are destined to ultimately be destroyed and no longer viewed as a human with equal rights under God’s law (Marx, p. 23-24, 1844). Then and now people are reduced to being seen only as a tool that goes to the repair shop (Cortes, 9 Sept., 2016). The idea that the rich owe nothing more to the poor but the agreed upon wages, no more and no less just like paying for a calculator (Carlyle, p.146-147, 1843). That even their impending death does not entitle them to some kind of help beyond a contract (Carlyle p. 150, 1843).…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx stated that proletariat was oppressed and under the exploitation of the bourgeoisie. The workers would create products that the capitalist would sell for more than it was actually worth. There was profit from this system, but the proletariat did not benefit from it. According to Marx, this system would lead the society to self destruct. He believed the the continuation of exploitation would cause the proletariat to hate the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Porter Income Inequality

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He also shows that the portion of national income owned by the bottom fifth of the population changes in both directions (although more heavily downward) over time. This reflects processes of ebbs and flows, which once again contrast Marx’s vision of a one-way street toward equality through the breakdown of class. Finally, Marx argued that the proletariat would gain a sense of “class consciousness” and rebel against the bourgeoisie, giving way to a more equal society. In this article, though, there is no mention of any revolutionary sentiments among the working class against the capitalists. This may add a level of complexity to Marx’s theory where there may be other factors that promote solidarity other than class.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will explain Karl Marx’s conception of the development of the bourgeoisie, the development of the proletariat and where Marx sees this struggle leads to. I will also explain the bourgeoisie's relationship to feudalism. I will then discuss how capitalism has limited human freedom and what Herbert Marcuse thinks capitalism has done to individual humans. At the end, I will analyze Marx and Marcuse’s criticisms and I will explain my opinion on their criticisms. Karl Marx is an economist and a philosopher that writes about the bourgeoisie and the proletariats.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It tends to explicitly explain social life in the most accurate way possible as it clarifies the inequalities of money, gender, class, and age while displaying how members of privileged groups maintain advantages while subordinate groups struggle. The ruling class known as the bourgeoisie is made up of those who own property and the means of production. The lower class, who Marx called the proletariat consists of those who don’t own property or mans of production. The proletariat are exploited by bourgeoisie to…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead, the new ruling class, the proletariat, when in control, will abolish the ownership of private property and the classes will disappear (Marx & Engels, 1848). Marx and Engels (1848) state the resulting conflict and revolution can be solved through the adoption of Communism, whereby there are no class distinctions in the society. In the second preamble; ‘Proletarians and Communists’, Marx and Engels explores the relationship between the communism and the working class. They state that the Communism would be organized in favor of the proletariat and focus on their interests rather than those of a specific class (Marx & Engels, 1848). They expound on the characteristics of the Communist…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx states that not just does the worker become alienated, but their self worth becomes degraded. “On the basis of political economy itself, in its own words, we have shown that the worker sinks to the level of a commodity and becomes indeed the most wretched of commodities; that the wretchedness of the worker is in inverse proportion to the power and magnitude of his production” (Marx, 1). Additionally, Marx states that the political economy favors capitalism over labor and the workers. He states that the direction the political economy has taken has been of greed (Marx, 1).…

    • 1064 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most fundamental and important of these conflicts is that between the Bourgeoisie (those who own and control the means of production in society) and the Proletariat (those who simply sell their labor power in the market place of Capitalism)”. (Theories, 2009) One of the reasons that the philosophy of Karl Marx and Marxism is so misunderstood is the connection that society makes to…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Their system of administration combined both their own as well as Roman elements. The new social order saw the dominance of the military commander, who became the monarch & a new nobility, drawn from warriors and an educated, Romanised elite. Peasants, who constituted their armies, became impoverished due to continual warfare. This led to their enserfment to feudal lords. There existed 2 kinds of groupings in feudal Europe- serfs and lords in villages and craftsmen & journeymen or apprenti who were part of the guild organization in towns.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays