Bourgeoisie And Capitalism In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

Amazing Essays
In this essay I will discuss what the economic theorist, political theorist and social scientist Karl Marx (and to a minor degree Friedrich Engels) outline and explain in the Communist Manifesto in regards to the Bourgeoisie being responsible for the creation of their own grave-diggers and the pattern of class struggle that Marx sees developing under the Capitalist system. I will do this by first looking at how Marx views history previous to Modern Bourgeois society and the development of the Bourgeoisie and the flaws in his viewpoint, secondly looking at how the Capitalist system only appeared exploitative and was actually in its early stages when the Communist Manifesto was written and thirdly discuss Marx's theory that the Bourgeoisie will …show more content…
And with the development of the Bourgeoisie and Capitalism came the Proletariat. According to Marx, Proletarians live only as long as they can find work. And they can only do this as long as their labor increases capital. Marx writes of how Proletarians are a commodity who are vulnerable to all the fluctuations of the market. Due to the development of machines and the division of labor the Proletarians are viewed only as an appendage to a machine. Age and sex become less important as all people are viewed simply as instruments of labor. They are exploited by the Bourgeoisie and the capitalist system. The wage which the proletarian gets is also exploited by other Bourgeoisie. Such as property owners like landlords seeking rent. Marx continues to argue that without sufficient capital, and the coming of new technology that makes specialized skills no longer useful, other classes of society, such as trade people, sink into the lower strata of society. Into the …show more content…
In order for a class to be able to be oppressed its slavish existence must be sustainable. In contrast, laborers in modern industrial society are continually suffering a deterioration of their status. And in this industrial society they become poorer and poorer. The bourgeoisie are become unfit to rule due to the fact that they cannot guarantee "an existence to its slave within its slavery." Marx also declares that the Proletariat are connected by improved communication, and by the existence they share in common in which they are exploited. They are also in the majority in society, and their numbers continually increase. The most significant trait of the Proletariat according to Marx is that they have nothing to lose. They have no power or privileges they must defend. Instead, in order to help themselves they must destroy the entire Bourgeoisie system. Due to this, when the revolution of the Proletariat occurs they will destroy the entire system of class exploitation. This stage of history that Marx is describing is the last stage. Thus, with the development of Modern Industry, the Bourgeoisie produces "its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable.". Another concept developed by Prof. Schumpeter argued that capitalism, by fostering change and innovation, was a self-destructive, self-replacing, system. This was due to the fact that the market economy

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Marx predicted that capitalism will undo itself by ‘sowing the seeds of its own destruction’ p90 (MSOST). Therefore, by this meaning Marx believes that capitalism is a “historical phenomenon” which means that capitalism has a beginning, middle and end. (25 CAMST) . His theory is more focused on the origin of capital and the mode of operation as looking to the future of capital can be quite complicated. He believed that to understand capitalism it must be shown actual developments and actions of the people at that time.…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Further, he argues that this consciousness which is situated in proletariat is due to historical circumstances. Referring to Marx’s historical dialects, he states that that, “consciousness is nothing but the expression of historical necessity” (Lukács 1923). This historical necessity of consciousness compels the proletariat to realize the contradictions and irrationality of a given capitalist society. As the proletariat becomes aware of this irrationality, it will seek to transform society as a communist state. Further, borrowing from the Master-Slave dialectic, Lukács argues that the proletariat has more power to end reification while the bourgeoise might even intensify it.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If the proletariat decides it wants to free itself from bourgeois oppression, then their goal must be to abolish capitalism. If they achieve this goal, the proletariat will destroy the bourgeois culture, which created their own misery. This includes the destruction of religion, family organization, morality, etc. Culture, according Marx, is the result of economic conditions within the society. The result of this struggle between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat is, according to Marx, is "an association in which the free development of each is the condition for the development of…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It has created power structures and the workers at the bottom have ideas imposed on them, which they are forced to accept. Human labor will soon become superfluous by the perfecting of future machinery (Engels, p. 707). This will create even more division between the people because of the existing competition. This “now puts these individuals in a position to raise themselves into the ruling class” (Marx, p. 174). The capitalistic society that we live in has enslaved workers.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This essay explores the three main themes of the communist manifesto. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels discuss class struggle, the modern bourgeoisie as a result of the revolutions and also the proletariat’s as the subject and object of history. Class struggle Marx and Engels explore the conflict which was present between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat societies. Society years ago to today’s modern society have always worked in the same way, those of a lower class work for those above them. Class struggle occurs when the proletariats are paid by the bourgeoisie to produce things for them to sell.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The division of labor has been a main way to organize society due to the the economic dependency that society has forced onto people in order to justify the status of the elite class. The foundation of economic structures functions to secure and maintain the structure of domination, because of it’s ability to subject a certain population, in this case poor people of color, in order to develop the country through forced cheap labor. Smith idolizes the breakup of labor, because it relates to the notion of people not having the potential to full power, and therefore become reliant on economic structures for their survival. Smith highlights the division of labor as a way to get workers to perfect their one task, in order to increase and expedite mechanisms of production in order to achieve “universal opulence” ( Smith 1776: 2012:59), which enforces the objectification of workers, whereas humans are no longer viewed as a necessity to the functions of society. Rather, workers are solely recognized for their labor as it is valued and exploited for the economic structures to thrive.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this world division of labor and capitalism is essential for capitalist, most people would also think is important for the workers as well. Which it is for a period of time, but after a while the benefit fades away. There are more negative consequences of division labor and capitalism than you think. This essay will analyze all the negative consequences of the division and labor and capitalism arguments by Smith, Marx, and Durkheim. In Adam Smith’s book “An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations” Smiths argue that the division labor destroys “intellectual social and martial virtues”.…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In The Communist Manifesto, the oppression of the Bourgeoisie upon the proletariats results in their dehumanization. Through the exploitation of labour the proletariats diminish into a way of life that does not allow them to mindfully explore their own humanity. Proletariats will initially crave their own humanity as a means to overcome the Bourgeoisie oppression. The primary drive of a proletariat revolt lies within their need for humanization within their own self-connection and connection to each other. Labourers are alienated from craftsmanship through factory work, and thus lack in pure self-sufficiency.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alienation also causes the division of labor into subgroups that work on tedious and redundant tasks in factories. This “deprives the work of any interest,” separating man from himself (Capital, 409). Having people do many small jobs increases the productivity, but it calls for a lot of people to work, and therefore makes, “overpopulation a necessity of modern industry” (Capital, 424). It would be rational to think since there are so many people that they would be able to work together, but even still workers are separated from one another: “Laborers are isolated persons who enter into relations with the capitalist but not with one another” (Capital, 386). This large quantity of workers originally hold some power in their ability to create, but that is taken away and alienated from them when he, “bargains for [his products] sale with the capitalist” (Capital, 386).…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It suggests that people feel alienated from their work for various reasons. Marx suggested that alienation is one of the effect on the working class by working under the capitalist society. The working class are the ones who create the product but under the capitalist society they don’t own the product despite them working to make it. The capitalists, who own the machines or owns the means of making the products, dictates everything. This gives rise to the feeling of alienation.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays