Kant's Rational Reasoning Essay

Improved Essays
What Kant means by this is one cannot do whatever they want without boundaries; there should be a set of rules that prevent one from doing such. Although this is what one desires, one has the inclination to be excluded from these laws and if one gives in to their urge to act a particular way, they wont be defined as a moral person. You have to make rational decisions, but sometimes that may not be the case. Kant believes that one requires a master, someone who will help break the urge to be excluded from the laws that help maintain order. Once one uses rational reasoning and has a master to help ease the inclination, one will not be interfering with other people’s freedom. Everyone has the need for supreme power in them, it just needs to be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion, profit is the number one concern for these drug companies as proved by using Kant’s second categorical imperative. The large pharmaceutical companies spend money to market their expensive drugs that they want consumers to purchase. They decide which medications will be marked directly to you. If direct-to-consumer advertising was illegal, the money saved on advertising costs might lower the costs for drugs. This current practice uses patients as a means to reach the company’s end, which is profit.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant Personal Response

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Name- MAYANK MANGAL ID No.- 2014A4PS459H Assignment: Personal Response Essay Immanuel Kant : An answer to the question: What is Enlightenment An answer to the question: What is Enlightenment is an essay which was written by Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) in the year of 1784, the greatest modern philosopher of all times is deeply inspired by Rousseau from where he adopts the novelties of freedom as autonomy or itself legislation. The essay addresses the causes of lack of enlightenment and the preconditions which are necessary to make it possible to enlighten the people. Kant thinks that the people should be given freedom to use their own intellect and he abolished all church and state paternalism.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Chapter 5 Sandel introduces us to the philosopher Immanuel Kant. This chapter talks focuses on Kant’s view on motive such as: What is the Supreme principle of morality and what is human freedom? Kant believes that morality is based on universal law. Kant calls this act categorical imperative. The idea is that you should treat everyone how everyone would want to be treated.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s impact on Western thought is undoubtedly profound. Being one of the most distinguished figures of the German Idealist movement of the late 18th and early 19th centuries, Kant’s work has set a precedent that, to this day, deeply influences our understanding of ethical discussion, political philosophy, and human cognition. Kant’s multiple contributions still are subject of debate; although, it is his Categorical Imperative that gathers the most attention, discourse, and controversy. Being a reaction to the subjectivity of his era, the Categorical Imperative provides an objective and infallible guideline for universal moral behavior, that stipulates one’s actions should not be dependent on ulterior motives and in consideration that the act itself will become universally accepted, ergo, if one were to steal then one should also be accepting of…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Immanuel Kant an 18th century German philosopher considered rather notable for his work in ethical philosophy. Kant was responsible for the book Groundwork of Metaphysics of Morality and his work remains relevant today as a crucial ‘part of Western Moral Philosophy’. Kant argues that reason is what predisposes what is right. Kant believed that religion should not be taken into consideration when determining what is morally right. Kant’s reasoning of this is explained that if one only gaged what is right based on religion this would not result in a ‘supreme principle of morality’ for all people.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant Prolegomena Argument

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kant Kant uses the Prolegomena his writings to educate teachers and learners on the potential of discovering the science of metaphysics. Kant in his writings questions the possibility of metaphysics claiming that it does not show a significant difference between truth and error. In fact, he maintains that metaphysics has not yet acquired universal access to knowledge that is capable of classifying it as a pure mathematics. Kant acts as the center of understanding the modern physics through the establishment of the understanding of pure knowledge of metaphysics. His critique of the impending theory of knowledge and Critique of Pure Reasoning relates the ancient studies with the upcoming philosophical studies.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What is the most significant thing I learned this week? In the reading of Contemplative Vision Chapter 2, the discussion of retreats truly helped open my eyes in the impact that spiritual retreats can have on our journey with God. Prior to reading this chapter I had the wrong idea of what a spiritual retreat was.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author explains an empirical perspective of moral thinking when carrying out certain obligations that are pegged in premises. He argues that it is upon one's moral and logical reason to do what they ought to do in an event of a command or a mere responsibility. The article basically entails critical ethical and utilitarian argumentum regarding principles of moral behavior. The author's elucidation on moral ethics is inspired by Kant and Plato bringing about a clear comparison of duties ought to be done and propositions inter twined with moral decisions.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will begin this paper by stating that I take on the viewpoint of a Kantian. The issue at hand is whether a physician should harvest the organs of a Mr. X who is a convicted criminal, divorced, and has abandoned his two kids. Mr. X is currently in a deteriorating state, with only a few months to leave, thus the question posed, is whether a surgeon should be allowed to transplant his organs to five career-oriented individual persons who are all treasured by their families? Although these five individuals may suffer the fate of death, I truly stand on the notion that Mr, X should not be killed in order to save the lives of these five individuals. First off, I will begin with an obvious noteworthy point opposing my stance, which I later subject…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout our lives we have always tried to come up with different solutions to solve several different problems. As a kid a common solution we always had but could never do is to blow things up. If we could just totally get rid of our problem, then that certain problem will never arise again. This dilemma is still a problem in today’s modern society and if we should just send a nuclear missile to deal with our enemies. Yes, this would be a quick and easy solution to the problem, but the real issue with that is the morality behind it.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Final Exam 1. In “A Critique of Utilitarianism”, Bernard Williams argues against the fundamental characteristics of utilitarianism and believes that the notion of ends justifying the means are a way of representing the doctrine of negative responsibility which can lead to consequences from the choices we make/do not make (663). As a result, we are all responsible for the consequences that we fail to prevent as well as the ones we brought upon ourselves. That is, in each case the choice on whether an action is right is determined by its consequences (661). Williams gives the example of killing one villager to save 19 others (664) in which he critiques the different principles of utilitarianism and integrity - the moral righteousness that is…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In other words, all individuals must uphold an unconditional good, to do this, one must be a rational person. A key factor relating to Kant’s theory, is that an individual may not interfere with another’s’ goals or objectives that a person may have. In addition, Kant discusses the moral rules that all autonomous and rational…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He strived to make morality and the same principles compliment all beings and make them view the world in only one way, his way. Immanuel Kant was a philosopher that believed morality is based on reason and not passion and it could be provable by reason as well. Kant’s ethics are all based off of the fundamental principle of morality, which comes with the freedom of your character and helping people, which was morally correct in his viewpoint. Kant speaks about the idea of freedom and the fundamental principle of morality. He explains that the reason that people are promoted to accomplish the correct action is because of freedom.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of morals, philosophers are usually separated into one of two categories, those who consider actions ethical or not ethical based on their motives, and those who consider an action ethical or not ethical based on the consequences of these actions. Immanuel Kant is a deontologist as opposed to consequentialists, making him an advocate for the former category. Kant is of the opinion that we are held responsible for our actions because we possess the ability to consider and explain the things we do, so any moral judgment should be based on our reasons for doing things. We should of course always contemplate the consequences of our actions, but they are not entirely at the mercy of our reason. Reason is only accountable for the…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays