Analyzing Kant's Elucidation On Moral Ethics

The author explains an empirical perspective of moral thinking when carrying out certain obligations that are pegged in premises. He argues that it is upon one's moral and logical reason to do what they ought to do in an event of a command or a mere responsibility. The article basically entails critical ethical and utilitarian argumentum regarding principles of moral behavior. The author's elucidation on moral ethics is inspired by Kant and Plato bringing about a clear comparison of duties ought to be done and propositions inter twined with moral decisions.
Hare gives an example of Kant's philosophical reason of ethical logics. He argues that we ought to do something based on proposition of a second premise that obligates us to partake a responsibility. For instance, all Christians are willed to do good by abiding to God's command only at a proposal of a second premise. Since God is perceived as good, it is the moral obligation of a Christian to heed to his command for the goodness of God is synonymous to moral perfection and sanctity. To think otherwise however, means that God is likened with darkness. It can therefore be denoted as pursuing acts of immorality when we ought to do a task on this negative analogue. …show more content…
An expert is to be informed of a required service which they have to do for us to see an outcome that is satisfactory failure to which people will never seek his or her services. A politician is entrusted to have philosophical traits that we only need to follow whatever they please having in mind that it is morally correct. This makes subjects to take orders without fear of moral decay. When an atrocity is committed then the blame back pedals to the high ranking superior other than the actual perpetrators of crime. It is important to note that one should view both premises, then command and the second proposition before taking up a