Kant Vs Aristotle

Kant and Aristotle both have differing stances when it comes to the entirety of philosophy. First, before I delve into the details that differentiate the two from each other, I will first expand upon Kantian ethics and the virtues of Aristotle. After doing so, I will follow by explaining the underlying problem that each philosopher has, as both Kant and Aristotle each have their own issues. Following this will be the major differences between the two, such as how they perceive life and duties. There is a major distinction amongst Aristotle and Kant, a distinction which rests upon the core of each individuals methods of insight. Aristotle’s consequentialist base persuades and lectures that a man may be moral by taking after the “brilliant signify” or by being prudent, in this manner inevitably accomplishing bliss. Kant on …show more content…
Kant, quickly, is attempting to answer a question more along the lines of: What sort of character is most meriting good regard. While we might be upbeat for the individuals who live well and effortlessly, Kantians will probably regard those for whom a decent life is not a simple one. Since Aristotle and Kant are not attempting to answer similar inquiries in giving their individual records of prudence, it is not clear that they are truly in struggle with each other, in any event in the way that was at first thought. Some knowledge can be picked up by asking (or attempting to solicit) them the other's question.
There remains a leftover, however extraordinary, contrast between them: Kant is a great deal more cynical than Aristotle is about the likelihood of people carrying on with an existence without variant slants. Kant, being a decent Protestant, conceives that human instinct makes this incomprehensible and abandons us with moderation as the most that we can seek