Mill's Greatest Happiness Principle Analysis

Improved Essays
In this final essay, I was debating over whether to write about the moral principle about Kant’s Categorical Imperative or Mill’s Greatest Happiness principle? I have chosen to go with writing about Mill’s Greatest Happiness principle. Throughout this easy I will be explain what exactly Mill’s greatest happiness principle is. I will also explaining Mill’s view against two objective. These objectives will be mentioned in the last part of this essay.
The first part I would like to explain about exactly what Mill’s greatest happiness principle is. Mill’s greatest happiness principle starts off with this quote, “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness
…show more content…
In this next objective that was brought up was “Is the Utilitarian principle sufficiently action-guiding?” There are two ways that utilitarianism may be determined not to be sufficiently action-guiding. The first is called the Super Saint objection. In this objection it is believed that utilitarian theory is way too demanding. (Unit 3/ Mill) The super saint theory believes we must all have care and concern for humanity. (Unit 3/ Mill) What is a concern with this statement is that this statement is not simple at all. It would be simply impossible for everyone in the world to care for everyone in a “saintly care” way. More utilitarian to ask everyone to be this way is kind of a big problem. Mill’s does have an answer for this so called problem. Mill say we “do not confound the rule of action with the motive.” (Unit 3/ Mill) Mills explains that there is way around this statement that seems to be hard for people to stick to. He explains that you do not have to love or care for all humanity. He explains all that we really need to do is consider if our actions or intentions has either a positive or a negative effect on others. (Unit 3/ Mill) For an example, suppose you see a child or someone is drowning or something in this nature. Some people feel it is their obligation to help that child or person out, while others see it as a way of earning an award for the heroic duty they have attempted. According to this action guiding it does not matter which person you are as long as the child is saved that is all that matters. (Unit 3/ Mill) This helps provide the maximum happens when the child is

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    To put this into other words in the hopes to further explain his point, consequences for ones actions must be thought of rather than the actual motif for doing so. This proves Stewarts idea of utilitarianism to be teleological as it is based on the results of actions, as well as it proves to not be egoistic as individuals happiness is not of concern but rather a collective happiness of…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill—a philosopher whom believed that another name for utility is the greatest form of happiness, a principal lead by the clause “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness are intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure”. With this, Mill presents the concept of utility as a stem from the presence of pleasure and the absence of pain within basic desires. According to Mill, the more valuable a pleasure becomes, the more of likelihood that an individual will employ higher faculties. Mill often juxtaposes human values of pleasure with that of pain.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Against this doctrine, however, arises another class of objectors, who say that happiness, in any form, cannot be the rational purpose of human life and action; because, in the first place, it is unattainable: and they contemptuously ask, What right hast thou to be happy?” (EEW p.234) Nevertheless, he was willing to prove them wrong and continued to defend utilitarianism. Mill replies that it is an exaggeration to claim that humans cannot experience happiness. He insists that happiness is possible in those who have experienced a few pains in their life and this could be an attainable life for almost everyone if academic and social reputations change for the better to cultivate the proper values.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will outline Mill’s argument of the Greatest-happiness Principle, and how he tries to dinguses himself from traditional Hedonism views, and raise the question if virtue for its own sake, produces…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Stewart Mill wrote a collection of essays that were compiled into one book entitled Utilitarianism. The book shares a title with the name of Mill’s ethical philosophy. The central theme of utilitarianism is to bring the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest number, that number including anyone or anything that can feel pleasure and pain. This theme has many facets, which Mill’s expresses in his book, and many applications. There are also those who criticize and have found weaknesses in this philosophy.…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction: John Stuart Mill, although accepts the Radicals legacy in the utilitarian domain, he adds to and supplements their points of views, especially in the areas of human motivation and the true nature of happiness. When we read through Mill’s approach on happiness, we see how a lot of Radicals’ assumptions are modified, this can be seen in the second chapter of his essay: Utilitarianism. The Proportionality Doctrine is one of the most prominent concepts that emerge from his writing which suggests that actions are “right” when doing them leads to the highest amount of happiness as a lack of pain, and the reverse of this constitutes a “wrong” action. Here, happiness means pleasure which comes with the absence of pain, and unhappiness…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believes the best action is the one that brings happiness to the most people. Kant believes that to perform an action it needs to be morally right and not just the most beneficial to the majority of people. Mill’s theory of utilitarianism is one that is strongly based upon the idea that the correct action is one that we deem to bring the most happiness to people. When talking about actions, Mill states, “It can only be determined…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness is pleasure and the absence of pain versus unhappiness which is pain and the absences of pleasure. Mill thinks pleasures and happiness are the same. If something brings you pleasure, then you are happy. Just as if you are happy something has brought you pleasure. Take for example food, it is only desired to stop and/or prevent hunger which brings happiness to the person starving.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In many different situations, an action must be decided on. Mill and Kant each present two major theories as to how this decision is reached and how it can be judged as morally right or wrong. In the given predicament of Rescue I and Rescue II, each philosopher would argue for a different ethical approach based on the fundamental principles of their individual theories components of their theories. John Stuart Mills is famous for his views on utilitarianism. His view is revised from his teacher Jeremy Bentham’s theory of crude utilitarianism which introduces the Greatest Happiness Principle().…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through Mill’s view on Utilitarianism there emerges a core moral theory called the greatest happiness principle. However, I believe that Mill’s Greatest Happiness Principle is false. I believe this because after examining his theory I noticed several flaws within his theory. Before I say what is wrong with Mill’s argument and theory I want to address the definition of the greatest happiness principle and what all it encompasses. Mill believes that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, [and] wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill,97).…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Proven above, we know this is very different than Kant. It is evident that Kant’s ideas solely focused on the intention, but opposite, Mill is more concerned about the outcome. Mill emphasizes the consequences of an action and how the consequence of an action is the justification of morality. If an outcome brings you happiness or the least amount of pain then we are achieving the goal of morality, for Mill. Although many argue that utility does not take play in justice, Mill disagrees.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Now, let’s look at what Mill would do in our situation. So not only are we wanting to make a choice that will produce the greatest good for the greatest number. The greatest number is for all that will be affected by the decision that is made. Mill's greatest happiness (principle utility) means that we should choose the option that will give them the most happiness. The problem is Mill believes that the best happiness is achieved when everyone is happy and there is an absence of pain and suffering.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Philosophers Mill and Kant provide divergent views on morals and ethics. Mill 's philosophy of Utilitarianism and Kant 's philosophy of Categorical impartial are two examples. Kant’s philosophy is a theory that People should do the right thing, even if that produces more harm than doing the wrong thing. Mills philosophy is a theory that the action that makes the most overall happiness is what is morally…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is the most correct ethical theory mainly because it emphasizes the significance of overall human happiness. Mill’s ethical theory, therefore, pays exceptional attention to the repercussions of actions as opposed to focusing on ethical sentiments. Just like the case with Aristotle and Kant’s ethical theories, Mill also conceives of morality as the pursuit for highest good. Mill’s definition of the highest good is happiness, which is solely understood as pleasure and absence of pain. It is worth appreciating the fact that for Kant and Aristotle, the emphasis does not necessarily rest on an action’s consequences.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thus, the ideal character 1 J. S. Mill, On Liberty 4 for Mill is the one who is able to establish a balance between the general ability to obey the social rules and the capability of thinking for oneself.2 It is now clear that, in Mill’s understanding, society is in the helpful position to improve individuals faculty. However, considering practical life, it is very controversial whether Mill’s theory is applicable. Many scholors seems to be considered Mill’s theory as an inconsistent in itself. The most obvious reason for this is that regarding Mill as a utilitarian, the happiness of the majority should be considered first, but the criteria which is given by Mill seems to be contradicted majoritiy’s priority.…

    • 2009 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics