Kant Vs Mill Research Paper

Improved Essays
Holden Gilbertson
Philosophy 101
Dr. Fletcher
RAP Assignment
Kant Vs. Mill
Mill believe that the consequences of actions determine its moral worth. While Both Philosophers have a good argument on the process of making decisions. Mill believes in utilitarianism and thinks that actions are based off of happiness. He believes the best action is the one that brings happiness to the most people. Kant believes that to perform an action it needs to be morally right and not just the most beneficial to the majority of people.
Mill’s theory of utilitarianism is one that is strongly based upon the idea that the correct action is one that we deem to bring the most happiness to people. When talking about actions, Mill states, “It can only be determined

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Both Kant and Mill created systems of philosophy that can guide the actions of an individual. Although neither system is perfect and they differ greatly, both have redeeming characteristics that attract believers. It can be seen that Mill’s utilitarianism attempts to remedy the problems brought up through practicing Kantian ethics. Although his propositions have strong merits, they can still be disputed by a Kantian. The example of lying can help one see the differences and problems with both systems.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism provides the reader with a meaning behind the value of utilitarianism as a moral theory. Mill defines the utilitarianism theory as one that state's “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (p. 90). Many utilitarians look at utility as pleasure, with the absence of pain. He presents utilitarianism as a view that utilitarians perceive to be the morally right action is the action that produces the most good. This is implied by the theory that the right action is accepted in terms of the consequences produced.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill’s theory talks about utilitarianism which talks about the action that people take should be in accord to promote overall human happiness. Happiness to Mill is pleasure and no amount of pain which is also considered the highest good. Which in turn defines good as the same thing as pleasures without pain. Utilitarian’s says we should consider everyone’s pleasure and not just our own. Although, there are different types of pleasure which he refers to as higher and lower pleasures.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant And Utilitarianism

    • 2082 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Mill's and Kant's theories disagree on a very fundamental level. Mill's theory, utilitarianism, regards the final result…

    • 2082 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the beginning of time philosophers have concerned themselves with the question of morality: what is morally right or wrong? How are these moral truths known to be so? A well-known proposal to answer this moral dilemma is the notion of Utilitarianism as presented by John Stuart Mill, in Exploring Ethics. Utilitarianism attempts to solve all questions of morality by presenting criteria that must be met in every situation at all times for a decision to be the morally right thing to do. Through utilitarianism, Mill hypothesizes a philosophy that is theoretically applicable to every universal moral issue.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill describes that a true utilitarian does what would maximize the totally utility for everyone. An elementary explanation of this is if you were on a run with some friends and you were the only one who brought a bottle of water. If you drank this bottle of water, you would get two utiles on happiness. If you took this water and shared it with your four other friends, giving them each a utile of happiness, then the five joined utiles would be greater than the two only you would get. This idea supports Mills beliefs in the way where he believes that maximizing the total amount of utility in right, because you are not being selfish and you are producing the most amount of happiness for everyone rather than yourself.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Mill does not dwell much on the question of “right”, since from his arguments in support of utilitarianism he apparently believes that every person derives the right to be happy from his/her mere existence. While most scholars might argue that people can live without happiness, Mill argues that a life without happiness is not worth living. The reason being the despair and misery such a life brings, hence, making it impossible for one to continue living. Therefore, under the utilitarian model of ethics, Mill happiness is not about self-gratification, but the attainment of a state of well-being for an individual and those around him/her. As such, his principle suggests that an action is morally right if it maximizes the happiness among most…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Proven above, we know this is very different than Kant. It is evident that Kant’s ideas solely focused on the intention, but opposite, Mill is more concerned about the outcome. Mill emphasizes the consequences of an action and how the consequence of an action is the justification of morality. If an outcome brings you happiness or the least amount of pain then we are achieving the goal of morality, for Mill. Although many argue that utility does not take play in justice, Mill disagrees.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    , 2016 John Stuart Mill thoughts upon utilitarianism was that happiness equals pleasure and the absence of pain and unhappiness equals pain and not happiness. The root word of utilitarianism is utility, which can be defined as the state of being profitable, useful, or beneficial. Utilitarianism, in other words, can be described as the moral beliefs that an action that is right can produce the greatest good for a great amount of people. That being said, it is seen as a mathematical theorem which is looking at a total number of units that makes someone happy when an action is given. It is based on the calculations of an outcome of a certain action.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The key features of the argument on Utilitarianism developed by John Mill focus on his support for valuing utilitarian as a moral theory. He first defines what he believes utilitarian means in which he states: “Actions are right in proportion, as they tend to promote happiness, wrong, as they tend to promote the reverse of happiness (Mills, 90).” John Mill believes that what is considered to be moral can neither be a right or wrong action. In order to determine whether an action is right or wrong it would depend on the overall non-moral good that was to be produced in the consequence of that action. Mills utilitarian moral theory focused on maximizing general happiness by analyzing the greatest good for the greatest number.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill takes a different stance on this because he believes that to achieve true freedom, the government should only intervene when one’s freedom poses harm to others. Mill thinks that laws should be minimal and do not act as an infraction of one’s freedom. Mill argues against positive liberty as he believed it was a potential threat to the pursuit of happiness. A clear contrast exists between Kant in Mill because Kant believes that rationalism was of great importance whereas Mill thought that happiness was the common goal of all people. The two differ on this matter because Kant thinks…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Philosophers Mill and Kant provide divergent views on morals and ethics. Mill 's philosophy of Utilitarianism and Kant 's philosophy of Categorical impartial are two examples. Kant’s philosophy is a theory that People should do the right thing, even if that produces more harm than doing the wrong thing. Mills philosophy is a theory that the action that makes the most overall happiness is what is morally…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Edmund burke Adam Smith, John Locke, John Stuart Mill and Karl Marx helped with the creation and improvement of the political system in the today’s world. Their revolutionary ideas gave birth to the most common political systems. Conservatism, Democracy, Socialism, and Liberalism are the most common political system in the world, and Burke, Adam Smith, John Locke, john Stuart and Karl Marx were some of the political thinkers that made those political theories arise. Edmund Burke was a British statesman, parliamentary and political thinker. Burke was born in Ireland, Dublin in 1729.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill uses the example of murder and theft, we know that typically these types of actions minimize happiness more than maximize it. We rely on familiar principles that were proven throughout history, therefore, extensive calculations are unnecessary in every situation (p.374). In Mill’s defense of utilitarianism, he creates a distinction between two moral rules. One is the subordinate rules of morality; this particular set of rules are classified under…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    PS 313 Modern Politics Essay Number Two Jessica Arteaga-Ramirez Instructor – Dr. Jackie Vieceli John Stuart Mill on “The Principle of Happiness” John Stuart Mill was a dedicated philosopher on his work on ethics; his definition of the utilitarian principle was very popular. So Mill in his essay on human ethics writes about ways to seek utilitarianism or more specifically, the Greatest Happiness Principle. Mill explains that all action is for the sake of some end, and rules of action. It seems natural to understand, must take their whole character and color from the end to which they are obedient.…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays