Justice Samuel Alito Case

Improved Essays
Justice Samuel Alito, Jr. currently holds a position on the Supreme Court of the United States as one of the court’s conservative justices. He is known for his right wing leanings that sometimes encompass libertarian ideals. His father was an immigrant, and Alito’s Italian identity would later inform the way Alito viewed discrimination. He attended Steinart High School, the local public school, where he immersed himself in extracurricular activities with a focus on student politics and debate. He graduated at the top of his class and continued his education at Princeton University. During his time at Princeton, Alito participated in the school’s ROTC program, afterwards receiving his officer’s commission to become a 2nd Lieutenant with the Army Reserve. He would go on to reach the rank of Captain. When …show more content…
For sixteen years, Alito served as a judge in the U.S. Court of Appeals. It was here that he proved to be difficult to predict in his rulings. “While he was a conservative judge, he approached rulings on a case-by-case basis, rather than perceiving and assigning a farther-reaching ideology to the case at hand with the hope of that ideology extending to cases beyond the present one.” (Chicago-Kent par. 3) Alito’s heritage as the child of an immigrant made him sensitive to the plights of those he viewed to be like him, as shown in his alignment with the majority in Fatin v. INS (12 F.3d 1233, 1993). The case, regarding an Iranian woman seeking asylum, was heard in 1993, and the court stated that she was eligible for asylum based on her membership in a feminist organization. This bleeding-heart style of conservatism ended when he did not identify with the litigant. In 1991, Alito dissented in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (505 U.S 882, 1992), a case where the majority struck down a law that forced women to alert their husbands before getting an

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Robert Franke CRJ 410 12/5/2015 Final Paper Justice Clarence Thomas was born in 1948 in Pin Point, Georgia, which was a mainly black area that was founded by freed slaves after the Civil War. He was the second ever black judge, in the Supreme Court and was at first not thrilled to working as a judge. As Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States his views are typically from a conservative stand point, and usually wants a solution that limits the power of the federal government and expands the power of state and the local governments, interestingly enough he has demonstrated a strong support from a stronger executive branch within the government. His father M.C. Thomas was a farm worker while his mother Leola Williams…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alito’s decision presented was short, concise not surprising. Yet, absent of the Rhode Island minor who had his child support delayed as this fascinating legal battle…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The supreme court justices Samuel Alito answered to this case that Mr. Salina didn't have the right to remain silent. Mr. Salina was free to leave, which didn't insert his Miranda rights and he had therefore no right to remain silent. Justices Samuel Alito stated that Mr. Salina´s should have affirmatively invoked his rights, because without Mr. Salina´s having a lawyer or being told the Miranda rights he should have been more affirmative about his invoking. (http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/06/salinas_v_texas_right_to_remain_silent_supreme_court_right_to_remain_silent.html) Salinas v. Texas is demonstrating the Miranda rules in a way where if the rules doesn´t apply the questioned from the beginning the Miranda rights doesn't apply either.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito was born in Trenton, New Jersey, on April 1st, 1950. His parents were Rose Fradusco and Samuel A. Alito, Sr.. His mother was a schoolteacher; his father was the Director of the NJ office of Legislative Services and an italian immigrant. He attended Steinert High School, the local public school, where he immersed himself in extracurricular activities with a focus on student politics and debate. He graduated at the top of his class and continued his education at Princeton University.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. Just as it has been more interesting to take this class during an election year, perhaps now is also one of the most interesting times to study a Supreme Court justice. I chose John Roberts for two reasons, first, because he was a conservative and it is very likely that Donald Trump will choose a conservative justice this year. Secondly, because I thought it was interesting that he became a Supreme Court Justice at a relatively young age. I wondered, “Did he come from a well-known family?” “Were they wealthy?” or “Did he just put himself in all the right places at all the right times?”…

    • 2192 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clarence Thomas Essay

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is stated that Thomas is “clearly on good terms with his colleagues, and is a beloved figure within the small world of Court personnel” (The Atlantic). However, he will continuously be known for his extremely conservative ideals, his unique path toward entering the Court, and his distinctive approach to the law. His legacy so far has been of surprises and his memoirs are detailed in his book titled My Grandfather’s Son. There has been question on whether Thomas is “evolving”, reducing his extreme conservative outlook; however, the morals of a conservative will likely remain intact. It has been said that “Thomas will probably leave the Court with the most conservative record in its history”…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although state laws are important, federal power was more essential for the Supreme Court decisions and the establishment of the primacy of the judiciary in determining the meaning of the Constitution. John Marshall was one of the most influential Supreme Court Chief of Justices in American history. He leaned towards Federalist views and favored a strong government, but most importantly, he established that the Judicial system held a final say whether an issue was constitutional and supported the sovereignty of federal power over state laws. In most of his cases, John Marshall asserted that Federal laws surpass state laws and claimed that the judiciary system of the Supreme Court had the power to state whether the acts of Congress were constitutional.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    13. I observed that even though women groups were concerned about Clarence Thomas ruling against legal abortion during the first few court hearings when Thomas was asked about abortion he didn't even have an opinion on it. 14.I observed that Anita Hill a professor a law professor from the University of Oklahoma accused Clarence Thomas of sexually harassing her when they worked together. 15. I observed after many hearings of the Clarence Thomas, and Anita Hill case in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee the Senate voted Clarence Thomas to be serve as an associate justice for the Supreme Court by a vote of 52-48.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Federalist 78 Hamilton defends the Constitution’s lifetime tenure of Justices on the Supreme Court. In doing so Hamilton argues that, because of the Court’s particular role and purpose, appointing Justices for life poses no threat to republican governance. To start, Hamilton identifies the duty of the Court as, “to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution void,” this is what becomes Hamilton’s definition of judicial review. Those who opposed the Constitution, Antifederalists, argued that the power of judicial review was far too great to be wielded by Justices appointed for life. In response to this Hamilton argued as to why lifetime tenure was, “an indispensable ingredient in,” the efficacy of the Judiciary.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chief Justice Earl Warren Many Supreme Court Justices have left behind some type of legacy. John Marshall for instance, through the Marbury v. Madison case he was able to confirm the establishment of judicial review- the ability of the Supreme Court to limit congressional power by declaring legislation unconstitutional. In his paper, I will be focusing on former Supreme Court Justice, Earl Warren. This paper explains his early life, law practices, and the legacy he left behind.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thurgood Marshall Case

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thurgood Marshall is in an elite group of lawyers, from 1940 until 1960, his time as lead counsel for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) placed him at the forefront of the Civil Rights Movement. During his tenure, he argued 32 cases before the Supreme Court of America and won 29 of those cases. This prolific use of the law to fight discrimination gave him the moniker “Mr. Civil Rights”. His skill as a lawyer helped to overturn or change laws that discriminated in voting, transportation, housing, and schooling. He specifically challenged laws in the areas of racial inequality in voting practices, racially restricting covenants in housing, segregation in public transportation and public education.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After watching the movie Muhammad Ali’s Greatest Fight, many of the events/situation that occurred between the Supreme Court Justices and law clerks surprised me. First, I was fascinated by Justice Harlan’s law clerk, Kevin Connolly’s tenacity and idealistic attitude during the process of rejecting and accepting the case, Clay v. the United States. For instance, Connolly’s bravery was demonstrated when he tried to dismiss his responsibility to write the brief directed by Justice Harlan due to his political ideology.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The information contained in Becoming Justice Blackmun demonstrates the forcible, yet changeable, as a matter of law, nature of precedent with regards to the penetration of the lives of the United States citizenry. Most prominently cited, the Roe v. Wade decision, altered the age-old belief of the criminalization of abortion. Blackmun wrote in his notes, “‘Here we go in the abortion field” (Greenhouse, 72), prior to the hearings of three cases involving abortion; thus, Blackmun, as well as the other Justices, understood the importance of the abortion cases with regards to the development of rights for women and their physicians. By the 1972, one year before the ruling in Roe v. Wade, a Gallup poll revealed that a significant number of Americans…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Law and Order Supreme Court justice could be called the most prestigious law job in America. Justices make some of the most important decisions for the United States, and once appointed they serve for life, or until they step down. Unfortunately, there is no definite time when a justice’s “life term” will come to an end, and Justice Antonin Scalia’s suddenly ended earlier this year. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia died suddenly this year during a hunting trip in Texas at age 79. Scalia was an influential conservative justice in the Supreme Court, and his death leaves the court with a 4-4 split of democratic to republican justices.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays