Judicial Branch Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
What if we lived in a world with laws that made it seem like there was no point to the Constitution? The Judicial Branch has powers just like the other two branches. The Judicial Branch is all about the courts. The First Congress established the Supreme Court. The Judicial Branch is the branch that acquires the Supreme Court. Within the Supreme Court there is the power of Judicial Review. Some people may think that the Supreme Court should not have the power of Judicial Review. The Supreme Court should keep the power of Judicial Review because, we need someone to enforce the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, and neither Congress or the Executive Branch should acquire this power.
The Judicial Branch is all about the Supreme Court
…show more content…
Madison. According to www.uscourts.gov and the U.S. Constitution, the Supreme Court can declare acts of the Legislative Branch and the Executive Branch unconstitutional. This is called Judicial Review. For example, if someone comes to court stating that the Legislative Branch or the Executive Branch has done something that violates the U.S. Constitution, then the Supreme Court can talk, argue, and vote on whether or not the Legislative Branch or the Executive Branch has indeed, done something unconstitutional. The US Courts Website states that Judicial Review started in the case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803. In this case, the court had to decide if an act of Congress or the Constitution was the Supreme Law of the Land. Since Article VI of the U.S. Constitution confirms the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, the court held that any act of Congress that goes against the Constitution cannot withstand. In later cases, the court also established its ability to take down laws by the states found to be unconstitutional. Although, some people think that the Supreme Court should not have the power of Judicial Review, I

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The first case that has established the power of the federal government by Supreme Court is McCulloch Vs Maryland. In 1816 Congress created a bank in the state of Maryland. Two years later Maryland Assembly passed a law to impose taxes on the bank. McCulloch was a cashier at the bank and refused to pay the tax. The Constitutional questions that were being asked Did Congress have the authority to establish the bank?…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Dbq Analysis

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although a majority of documents convey the impression, to be against the Supreme Court having the power to question the constitutionality of federal laws; but the amount of documents that agree, have more solid evidence in their argument. The Supreme Court should have the power to overturn unconstitutional federal laws. Federalist No. 78, the Marbury v. Madison decision, Article III of the Constitution and the Judiciary Act of 1789 are prime examples to prove that the judicial branch has the authority to do so. First of all, in Federalist No. 78, written by Alexander Hamilton in 1788; declares that, “[The] courts were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and the legislature...”(Doc D).…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The U. S. Constitution has an important feature and that is its provision for a system of checks and balances. In this system the branches are created and power is shared between them. The power of one branch can be challenged by another so that one branch cannot become too powerful. This is what a checks and balances system is all about. The U.S. Constitution created three branches as a part of our United States government.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It established the power of judicial review in Marbury v. Madison (1803)” (Lenz & Holman, 98). The significance of this case has since established a model of the Judicial Branch when reviewing or declaring unconstitutional actions by the Legislative and Executive Branches. This set the precedence that the Judicial Branch’s power equals its parallel branches, “an equal in power to the Congress and the president.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Court had the right to review acts of Congress and the actions of the President. If a law was found unconstitutional, the court could overrule it. Marshall wrote, “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” He argued the constitution is the Supreme law of the land and it has the final say over the meaning of the…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mcculloch V. Maryland

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Madison, the Marshall Court settled that the idea judicial review is the only the judicial branch that can review whether laws and actions were approved. The Marshall Court declared the power of the Supreme Court that has the capacity to understand the Constitution and could use it to determine the legality of the other two branches actions. The Marshall Court modified how the Supreme Court was seen. In doing so the Marshall Court had an intense result on the American government.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Marbury v Madison all began when President Adams in his last days as president. President Adams was in a frantic rush to send out appointments for justices of peace. He wanted to have as many federalist ally’s as possible so his opponent Jefferson would not be able to change the old ways. (Hess 62) In doing so he was down to the wire on his last day as president, his appointments were approved by the senate and just had to be delivered.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation prohibit the government from raising an army, having a national court system, the power to engage in wars, and much more. The Articles of Confederation keep the government from solving many problems like engaging in wars, sharing power among the three branches of government, and collecting taxes. The constitution is a superior document to the Articles of Confederation. To begin with, the constitution allows the United States to engage in wars, enter treaties and alliances, as well as raise an army. The Articles of Confederation political cartoon show that the government would not have the power to raise an army, or enforce treaties.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court should be able to overturn unconstitutional laws that Congress has passed. There are many reasons to give the Supreme Court this power, first we need someone to enforce the fact that no law should violate the Constitution. Next, it helps balance the three branches of government, and lastly the Constitution puts judicial power into the Supreme Court and inferior courts. This power will stop substandard laws from getting passed, and will protect the structure of our government that is extremely based on the Constitution.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States government 's history, one thing remains the same, the three branches of government are as important as each other in keeping the nation thriving. Each with their unique set of strengths and weaknesses, the Judicial Branch is one that comes to mind when thinking of having the most powerful strength, proving a system of checks and balances to the other government branches. The Judicial Branch is responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of the actions of the government, according to Fine & Levin-Waldman (2016). What this means is, when something is signed into law or actions are taken, the Supreme Court of the United States decides if it follows the rights and laws outlined in the US Constitution. According to…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Eleventh Amendment

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Judiciary Can’t Have Too Much Power The Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution, changed a portion of Article III, Section II of the U.S. Constitution. Even before ratification of the Constitution anti-federalists worried that Article III, Section II would interfere with the sovereignty of the individual states. The original Article stated that: the judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in law and equity, arising under this constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made under their authority; to cases between a State and Citizens of another State and between a State or the Citizens of it and foreign States. The anti-federalist believed this would allow the federal government to override the States right to not be subject to a suit without the States consent.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is one of the ways that the Judicial Branch checks the other branches. For instance if the congress and the president pass a law but it is believed to be unconstitutional it is sent to the Supreme Court for review where the Justices (9) will analyze the law and use interpretation of previous laws primarily the Constitution the Law of the land so to speak to decide whether the law is truly lawful under the United States…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They use judicial review to determine if a court case’s law or actions contradicted the constitutional. Through the review of all the facts and information in each case as well the decision of that they can tell if that case goes with the constitution or against the constitution. Some may think one case is with the constitution while another case of similar fashion is unconstitutional. That is because the justices have different minds and also have their own opinions of each case that they see. When they have decided that a case is unconstitutional then there will be steps and procedures that will get that case repealed and another decision be made about that case.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nicolas Winters Group #5 Paper 2 What powers do the Constitution give the Judicial Branch? A world without the Judicial Branch of government is a world without set rules. In 1787, the Constitution had created the Judicial Branch, under Article 2 Section 2, to deal with all of the new laws that could be set in place. The Judicial Branch also leads the Supreme Court, the highest court of law in the United States. The Judicial Branch of government receives powers backed up by the U.S. Constitution, has a very strict and complex system to become a supreme court judge, and the U.S. Supreme Court Justices should interpret the Constitution by how it was originally wrote.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial discretion refers to the powers conferred to a judge in the legal system of a given country to determine the direction of a matter presented to them without the interference of preceding or strict regulations that are established by statutes (Bushway et al. 2012). Judicial discretion is assigned by the legal apparatus within a given jurisdiction, meaning that court decisions may be subject to contest through the utilization of higher powers. Judges are supposed to practice the discretion allowances up to the limit specified by the law, failure to which decisions may be subjected to comprehensive vetting. For instance, the practice of discretion may be void judgement decisions in the event of bias, capricious practices, and the exercising…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays