Joining The JROTC Program

Improved Essays
Joining the JROTC program has shown me that life has more to offer than what it seems. With the help of the JROTC mission of “To Motivate Young People to Become Better Citizens," I am one step closer every day to being the person I have worked so hard to be. This mission has helped me learn the values of law, truthfulness and trustworthiness, and has deepened my moral courage. Reading and reviewing the text, I have come to realize the true meaning of the law. It is there to help and protect people who cannot do that for themselves. Growing up I have always known to follow the law and it was always “good,” but the law is actually extraordinary because there is no way we would have structure in our society without it. People break the law,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Frank Trippett, in his excerpt, claims that the increasing count of americans in today's day and age are consistently breaking the law. The author supports his assertion by first explaining the fact that, even though many people only break minor laws, they should still consider themselves as law breakers. He continues by listing minor laws that people break everyday and are careless to the fact that they what they are doing is illegal. The author’s purpose is to make people aware of their actions and make them realize that what they have been doing, though it may be minor, is wrong and they should make better choices. Society as a whole should follow all laws, no matter how silly they might seem, because they are put into action for a reason; Whether it be because it is to protect one from one’s self or to protect one from others.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lon Fuller, while discussing the legal system and the addition of laws, brought up ways that you can fail in making laws. 1) The failure to make laws at all 2) Failure to publicize laws 3) Abuse of Retroactive legislation 4) Unintelligible rules 5) Contradictory rules 6) Rules requiring more than what is humanly possible 7) Frequent changes in the law 8) Lack of congruence between state rules and administration. Fuller believes if any of these failures occurs, the system of rules are no longer considered a legal system. I personally disagree with the notion that you can discredit an entire legal system and I’m goin to explain why I oppose Fuller’s claims.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I think that Boycotts are the most effective. Boycotts can break the image of something and call attention to people everywhere. Usually when theres a boycott on something, theres always another way around it. For example the Montgomery Bus Boycott. Although they relied on the public transportation to get them to places, they carpooled with other people, and even walked.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Decency Act Of 1996

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What is the intent of the law as written? What are the arguments for and against? The intent of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 was an attempt by Congress to censor and regulate obscene material and pornographic on the Internet. This legislation addressed concerns Congress had was regarding juveniles’ being able to search pornography on the Internet.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil disobedience is defined as the refusal to comply to certain laws as a form of peaceful protest. It has long been debated whether civil disobedience is beneficial to society. Acts of civil disobedience, seen and unseen in the media, have occurred at various points in history as forms of protest to oppression, violence, and discrimination. Although it could be debated that civil disobedience has negative and positive impacts on society, the positive impacts far outweigh the negative even if the only thing accomplished in the act of disobedience is raising awareness. Morris Leibman argues that the law serves a specific purpose.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stunz's Argument Analysis

    • 1289 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Another site of legal violence is within mass incarceration. William Stunz addresses the violence of the system as focusing on the process over the outcome. He focuses on how the law was put into place to create the desired outcomes, rather than looking at the results to create the law. This focus on the process means there is no inquiry to whether material outcomes of the process are actually just and as such it appears that the system does not want to fix the problem, but rather just emphasize an existing problem. This is a systemic violence because the way the way the law is interpreted causes the focus on procedure rather than the outcomes (Gopnik 2012).…

    • 1289 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "That government is best which governs least" ~ Henry David Thoreau. As you get older many things change, your friend groups change, things you like etc. But one thing that changes a lot is the ways laws are looked at. As a child you have this impractical view that all laws are made because they make the world a better place. Of course as a teenager there is a phase of delinquent behavior which changes views of laws.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My Experience In JROTC

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    My experience in JROTC has been fun. I remember my first year it was fun to learn more about the program. I met great people through the program. Its help you to find yourself like if you are meant for the military or not. But also to be nice to the community and yourself.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unjust Law

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To respect the rule of law while law breaking is a delicate matter. It involves being fastidious in focusing action on the law that is unjust, and not acting indiscriminately outside the…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a democratic society, when a person is accused of a crime, they are judged by a group of their peers. Most juries hear testimony, and render a verdict of guilt or innocence, based on evidence and how that evidence violates the established law. Jurors, also possesses the ability nullify a case, if they deem the respective violated law to be unfair. When considering the magnitude of power the ability to nullify places in the hands of twelve randomly selected people, one must consider; whether or not juries should possess the ability to use power of jury nullification. This essay will discuss the notion that twelve randomly selected people should not possess the ability to superseded laws that were established by democratic societies, because…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every modern society, culture, race, and religion share one commonality. That commonality is laws. Laws are one of the most foundational pieces of a society. They serve to maintain the balance of order and security, and to prevent total disillusion and anarchy. Laws are made to establish what is acceptable and what is wrong.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tajae Hinds Of Crimes and Punishments Essay Cesare Beccaria’s critiques of criminology in Old Regime Europe were, as some may say, ahead of his time. The Old Regime was predominantly built on a tradition of absolutism in government and its legislature. That being so, Beccaria’s critiques of these institutionalized traditions spoke volumes about what needed to be fixed, and posed solutions to said problems. In his treatise Of Crimes and Punishments, the criminologist mentions the obscurity of laws, as well as the interpretation of laws. To this day, remnants of Beccaria’s philosophies and its principles are still relevant, echoing throughout the judicial and legislative models in nations around the world.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In todays society the debate that constantly comes up is the difference between right and wrong. What may be right to some may be wrong to others. A problem that society currently faces, is that the average person is breaking laws, that were never thought to be broken until now. There are laws for a reason, but when people begin to break minor laws with no consequences, the purpose of a law (which is to protect the average citizen) diminishes, leaving no restrictions; therefore, people who have never thought to break a law, not even the speed limit, begin to test the boundaries, resulting in more and more people breaking minor laws; for people don’t see why they matter. There is a fine line between what is said to be right by law and what is right to someone personally.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Law of the Land vs. Moral Convictions Laws are put in place by the people for the people. So, going against the laws of the land is seen as unethical and simply not right. But when a person’s moral convictions cloud their minds, it could only lead to destruction of the balance put in place by laws. Morals are important, but not when they put the public in danger and disregard the fact that their decisions impact other people, especially when the law is set to benefit the greater good.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Law and morality have been a debate for many people throughout centuries and finding how they interconnect and whether they should at all. Some theorists such as John Stuart Mill, believe that morality has nothing to do with law and that harm to others is the only valid reason to limit someone’s freedom. Others believe that morality is something that cannot be separate from law because protecting those just from harm is insufficient. There are other things that the law protects besides just harm such as speed limits, marriage, and more. Those such as Devlin and Dworkin both believe that morality is a part of law but have different judgments of the way morality for a society should be chosen.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays