"That government is best which governs least" ~ Henry David Thoreau. As you get older many things change, your friend groups change, things you like etc. But one thing that changes a lot is the ways laws are looked at. As a child you have this impractical view that all laws are made because they make the world a better place. Of course as a teenager there is a phase of delinquent behavior which changes views of laws. As a teenager all rules are meant to be broken and they're made to ruin fun. Of course both of these views are completely false. As a young adult and a realist I believe that both sides have some give and take in the laws made by the government. There is no question that many laws were made to keep civilians safe both mentally
…show more content…
A historical example of peacefully resisting laws would be Rosa Parks. When Rosa Parks did not get up from here seat on the bus she did not make a scene or use violence to get her way, she calmly denied the bus drivers request for her to move. The grey line between Resisting arrest and disobeying laws is very thin and could be taken either way depending on the perspective of the person you're asking. And the one downside to this is the bias view this question gives. For example, a cop can look at this "disobeying" of laws as an act of crime and he could legally act on that. By doing this it puts the safety of every human taking part."There can be no law in which obedience is optional"~ Morris Leibman. The government has so many laws and for every law there is a million different consequences that could take place for certain laws being broken. I do believe that the government needs to be more specific with their consequences on laws so people are not so confused between right from wrong. The argument between whether peacefully resisting laws has a negative or positive affect on our society is a very bias question, there is no doubt it has its positive aspects , but at the same time there is no question negative aspects are there.
A historical example of peacefully resisting laws would be Rosa Parks. When Rosa Parks did not get up from here seat on the bus she did not make a scene or use violence to get her way, she calmly denied the bus drivers request for her to move. The grey line between Resisting arrest and disobeying laws is very thin and could be taken either way depending on the perspective of the person you're asking. And the one downside to this is the bias view this question gives. For example, a cop can look at this "disobeying" of laws as an act of crime and he could legally act on that. By doing this it puts the safety of every human taking part."There can be no law in which obedience is optional"~ Morris Leibman. The government has so many laws and for every law there is a million different consequences that could take place for certain laws being broken. I do believe that the government needs to be more specific with their consequences on laws so people are not so confused between right from wrong. The argument between whether peacefully resisting laws has a negative or positive affect on our society is a very bias question, there is no doubt it has its positive aspects , but at the same time there is no question negative aspects are there.