John Mill Utilitarianism

Decent Essays
In this situation according to Mill’s, “When given a choice between two acts, utilitarianism states that the act that should be chosen is the one that creates the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people.” The five workers have a higher utility than the one worker on the other track. According to mortality it is better to act in a way that benefits the most quantity of people, even if it causes harm to kill one to save five.

Having to make a choice between who lives and who dies is very heartbreaking. I know in life sometimes, some situations are limited to certain results like this one. Either you pull the level and allow the train to switch tracks and save the one worker or let it continue on its pathway and kill

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This makes me think of a parent trying to help their kid study. I know whenever my dad would try to help me with homework it would just confuse me further and cause me to be upset. While my dad was tutoring me believing that it was good will, it didn’t have a good outcome. The utilitarian approach also applies to the Trolley problem. Choosing to let one man die over five because you think it’ll cause a happier outcome is technically moral according to Mill.…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Given the trolley problem, I would pull the lever to save the five people. However, I would also shout at the person on the other set of tracks and tell him to move out of the way as I am pulling the lever. Hoping that he somehow finds a way to get off the tracks rapidly. After, switching the lever I would run to the person and attempt to get him out of the way. Even though the problem states that the is no way that the person will be able to get out of the way of the train tracks if I pull the lever, I would like to give him a chance to try and save himself.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There is no correlation between the operator and workers. Now the utilitarian perspective would address this dilemma by suggesting the operator to take the second route and save the five people. The reason for this is because with utilitarianism believes that where they is not pain or less pain there is happiness.…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Mills’ theory if utilitarianism, his recommendation to Jim would have been to kill the one Indian or “minimize unhappiness” (Edwards 125), in order to ensure the safety of the nineteen remaining Indians or “maximize happiness” (Edwards 125). Jim would have concluded this decision by considering “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness”(Mill 2004). When considering who would all be happy if Jim had…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question #1: In order to effectively answer this problem I will first provide a brief definition of the positive thesis brought forth by the moral theory of Utilitarianism. As stated by Mill in his article “In Defense of Utilitarianism”, “an act is right if and only if it brings about the greatest total amount of happiness out of all the actions available to the agent, whereby happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain”. (Mill 1990, 172). Essentially, Mill stated in his article that Utilitarianism defines a morally correct action to be one that produces the maximum amount of utility or pleasure within an act.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Being a Utilitarian evaluates consequences and the choices that situations bring upon someone to determine whether they are right or wrong. While taking this into consideration the action on the overall happiness of society is important. John Stuart Mill believes in utilitarianism, for example he does not believe ones sole happiness is more important than all those who are concerned. As some may know Mill favors inductive reasoning for being systematic. Mill comes to the conclusion that no matter the circumstances there is no grey area it is either good or bad; extremely straight forward.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Argument of Utilitarianism In “Utilitarianism” John Stuart Mill presents the case of Utilitarianism as a moral theory. Moral theories are structured as a set of statements used to predict a set of factors or concept. Moral theories are thought to be universal and tell which action is the right one in any given situation. Utilitarianism is one the most influential and best known moral theories, often called “The Greatest Happiness Principles”.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He has to choose on whether he should pull a lever to redirect a train from hitting five co-workers to another tract which it would hit just one worker. In this situation Alex has to use very careful reasoning to answering his choice. James Rachels simply stated, “The morally right thing to do in any circumstance is whatever there are the best reasons for doing so”. In answering this question he has to bring into consideration that he has to see all of his co-workers as equal and that no one is more important than the other. There would be no good reason for Alex to pull the lever, because in this case both would equal in death, and for him to choose to pull the lever would have him choose who he thought was more important.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Mill Utilitarianism

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Problem o The problem at hand relates to the topic of CBD-only medical marijuana items being introduced to Georgia. o These products help patients with a wide variety of diseases and disorders such as ALS, seizures, cancer, and many more. o The problem at hand lies not in how the products affect people, but how the products get to the people who need them.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mill Utilitarianism

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In his book, Utilitarianism, specifically in chapter 3, philosopher John Stuart Mill discusses the sanctions and the motives that human beings have that lead them to act in a moral manner. In this paper, I will be exploring in what ways J.S. Mill supports his claims. I will also be delving into analyzing what exactly the motives are, according to Mill. Then I will decide whether or not those motives provide compelling grounds for people to consistently act in a moral manner, no matter the circumstances. I will also be inspecting whether this theory of motivation that is presented by Mill is supposed to apply to individuals acting according to any moral theory.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Sandel, Mill tried to extend utilitarianism a generation later than Bentham. Mills wanted to make it more humane. Mills responded to both of the objections in Bentham’s utilitarianism theory. His writings aimed at joining individual rights with the utilitarian theory of greatest happiness. His book, On Liberty, valued the importance of freedom as long it as causes no harm to others.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are considered founders of Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an ethical theory where moral rightness is measured by what brings the most happiness to the most people. Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism because it is based on whether an action is morally justified by its consequences. Bentham and Mill differ in that Bentham reasoned that pleasure was measurable using hedons, units of pleasure, where actions with the highest score were the best action.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In ethics there are hundreds of theories that try to define morality. Utilitarianism is one of these theories that seems to simply be that if one is being moral, their decisions will create the greatest amount of happiness for everyone (Clark & Poortenga, 2003). This theory has been defended by many, including Jeremey Bentham, who popularized quantitative utilitarianism, and John Stuart Mill, who believed that utilitarianism was actually qualitative (Wilkens, 2011). While utilitarianism as a whole can seem clear-cut, John Stuart Mill’s theory of qualitative utilitarianism has many ethical problems, and is too simple to accurately address every moral decision. Utilitarianism is a fairly popular viewpoint when it comes to morality because it…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays