John Locke Salvation Of The Soul

Improved Essays
Saving soul is left to everyone
First of all, John Locke claims that the salvation of the soul is an individual right. To understand exactly what he means by that, we shall refer back to his theory on the state of nature, as addressed in Second Treatise of Government. According to Locke, society derived from the state of nature, which is a perfect state of freedom and equality. What he means by that is every human being in that state are completely free to order their actions and dispose of their person as they think fit. There is no authority above, no one has more power than anyone else. In other words, Locke state of nature is peaceful. We live together according to reason without a superior watching over us. We are our own authority. Yet, the threat of instability as he
…show more content…
The role of the State is to secure those civil interests. With that in mind, Locke's first argument that the magistrate has no business in the salvation of the soul as it is reserved for individual rights is directly connected to his state of nature. By leaving this state, men agreed to give up legislative power into the hand of the state while conserving executive power. Lock argues that the power of legislative cannot extend further than the common good, as it is addressed: “which is the sole reason of men’s entering into society, and the only thing they seek and aim at in it. And it is also evident what liberty remains to men in reference to their eternal salvation, and that is that everyone should do what he in his conscience is persuaded to be acceptable to the Almighty, on whose good pleasure and acceptance depends their eternal happiness.” The fact that men agreed upon entering society to preserve their property means they are willing to separate the powers while retaining possession of their rights to decide how to make use of their own soul and body. We consent to secure ourselves through the State, not our soul, as “every man’s soul belongs unto

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    1776-1800 Dbq Essay

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The newly created United States government upholded the Revolutionary principles from 1776 to 1800 by creating the basic law and order of our government in current time. The United States government in the period 1776-1800 relied on Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, John Adams, and George Washington to produce the foundation of the new American government. Successfully, the five writers developed important reference documents that Americans still use today for freedoms and rights. In document one, John Locke, an enlightenment thinker, writes in his “Second Treatise on Government” that a man will allow himself give up his rights and subject himself to the dominion and control of an other power of government. This statement implies that man is only interested in his own self, his own liberty, and his own property.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    MaKenna Jueneman World History 31 Oct. 2017 What Was the Main Point of the Enlightenment Philosophers? The Enlightenment was known as a philosophical movement or the age of reason. It took place in the late 17th and 18th century.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rebellion Dbq

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He said that God gave every man natural rights. These rights could not be taken away for any reason by anyone, even if that someone was royalty or an institution the royalty had created. Locke believed that anyone who worked in the “commons” (essentially anywhere…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Enlightenment was the root of many of the ideas of the American Revolution. It was a movement that focused mostly on freedom of speech, equality, freedom of the press, and religious tolerance. There were many enlightenment thinkers, but only 3 of many stood out to contribute to the ideas that led to the American revolution and still have an impact today. Montesquieu , John Locke, Thomas Hobbes thought different influencing American colonies, their opinions on the role of government, and how their ideas still influence us to this day.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He places explicit limits on the power of government over its subjects. Raising ideas such as property rights and consent, Locke states that the primary role of a government is to preserve society, ie. a harmonious state in which men are guaranteed protection under the law, and property. (262) To him, if a government descends into tyrannical rule, a state in which those in power act in self interest or beyond the law, it is the populace’s…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus leading individuals to create social contracts again for peace and protection of property. Not giving up their free will or rights. Locke believes the law of nature of still bound here. That the state exists solely to do what nature couldn’t and that is to uphold and protect natural rights of men.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke believed that the government should be ran by the people and everything should be made in the people’s favor. In the situation where the old government fails he recommended the legislative and executive branches but this decision is should be made by people. John Locke once stated in the “Second treatise on the Civil Government” “All Men are naturally “a state of perfect freedom… within the bounds of the law of nature”(Document A). What he meant from this is that We are all free and no one can stop us.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this, while all men possess the right to punish a crime against them, they also are burdened with the responsibility of doing so in order to ensure it to not happen again. “To the offender, give him cause to repent, and terrify others from doing the like” (Locke 150). He next addresses rights and responsibilities of the individual regarding “the state of war”. “He who makes an attempt to enslave me, thereby puts himself into a state…

    • 1573 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Each chapter explains a different part of how a government should be formed, where its authority should come from, and when it should be overthrown. Locke begins his work by stating the origins of men in nature, or how mankind existed before entering into civil society. Locke outlines the extent of man’s freedoms in nature; according to Locke man may “dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature, without asking leave, or depending upon the will of any other man. [4]” He then explains that man in the state of nature has no right to take his or any other man’s life.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Examining John Locke’s, a “letter concerning toleration” on which he speaks about the creation of a “secular state” and separating church from state can be a plausible piece of text to further understand or explain the “nijab citizenship controversy”. Some of Locke’s key ideas for why the state and church should be separated, include his beliefs about the greater good of the commonwealth and how religious or personal beliefs men have, being that they do not negatively affect the government or others around them, should be acceptable in an established state (p1). Locke also speaks about man’s salvation and how one’s choices revolved around god and their happiness, along with their birth and what they know from the environment their born in,…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He wrote that if any foreign people, that force the property of other people have to be resisted with force, but there was no law that also magistrates, that do the same thing, have to be resisted too. He also criticized, that many people, that people that are advantaged in law, would be able to break the law or change it to their advantage. In his writings Locke showed, that no ruler should be put in a higher position of the moral, than any other person that could be a criminal. He brought up the equality of crime. Locke says, that every criminal action is not different because somebody has a higher position in politics, it is still a crime and hurts the unalienable right of every person to be secure.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Locke believed that the government had no right in forcing a religion on anyone. Instead he felt that doing so would be completely meaningless because no one can be forced to believe something they truly don’t…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke and Jean-Jacque Rousseau present themselves as very distinct philosophers. They both use similar terms, such as, the State of Nature, but conceptualize them differently. In my paper, I will argue that Locke’s argument on his proposed state of nature and civil society is more realistic in our working society than Rousseau’s theory. At the core of their theories, Locke and Rousseau both agree that we all begin in a State of Nature in that everyone should be “equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection,” in which we are free with no government or laws to guide one’s behavior.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Maxwell James 9/29/16 Mr. Puzzo World History (H) John Locke and the French Revolution John Locke was a French philosopher and was interested in how a citizen and a government interact together, in times of peace and in times of tension. John Locke studied government and came to many conclusions; the role of government is to protect citizen’s natural rights: Life, Liberty and property. If a government wasn’t adequately protecting citizen’s natural rights, the citizens had a responsibility to overthrow that government and establish a new government that does better to protect those rights.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The act of translation is an inherently derivative act, while simultaneously giving the author a new agency over the material. The translator becomes the new works author, in this case a translation of the Psalms of David translated by Anne Locke. The piece was distributed anonymously, so the credibility of the author’s work cannot lie with reputation, but with literary talent. An author can prove their intellect and the importance of their work to the audience through alluding to classical literary traditions, demonstrating their authority over the subject matter.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays