Free Will, Praise, And Blame Analysis

Superior Essays
The discussion of morals and moral responsibility is deep-seated in the classic philosophical repertoire. A closely related matter, and a frequent objection to moral responsibility, is determinism, the idea that given the initial state and laws of the universe, all future events and outcomes are completely determined. Over the course of this paper, I describe a particular theory for how moral responsibility can exist even in a deterministic universe.
One prominent view in the realm of moral responsibility is the libertarian stance. Libertarians believe that moral responsibility is incompatible with determinism because they see humans as necessarily free and morally responsible agents. In his essay “Free Will, Praise, and Blame,” J. J. C. Smart refutes the libertarian theory and puts forth his own framework for understanding the question of moral responsibility. Smart claims the libertarian perspective is unfounded because it is built on a contradiction. He contends that there are only two ways events may occur: through causal continuity or by pure chance. If all events are causally continuous, all outcomes can theoretically be predicted if the initial state of the universe is known. If some events occur rely on pure chance, it becomes impossible to accurately predict outcomes,
…show more content…
He specifically focuses on the kind of moral responsibility that would hold human agents ultimately accountable for their actions, the kind of moral responsibility that would make it justifiable to eternally reward or punish people for their actions through heaven and hell. In simple terms, the Basic Argument may be stated as

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Hard determinism arguing that life without free will is not bad, but, Accepting hard determinism is about inconceivable. It also argue that if people have freewill then, they do not have any moral responsibility and people were fully free to do anything. Nor is it clear that one could stop believing in free will (pg. 119-120). Whereas, libertarian is opposite to hard determinism and called indeterminism.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Libertarianism is the view that we are free, and believe in the idea of freewill suggests that there is an important relationship between freedom and moral responsibility. Freewill means that we should be held morally responsible for the actions that we freely preform. Libertarians hold the view that moral responsibility require freedom, they suggest we have a sense of self-determination and freedom in order to act. Libertarians are also described to be in-compatibilists, as they argue that freewill cannot be compatible with determinism. Libertarians hold the conscience a non-empirical concept of great importance; the conscience is the idea that we should only do things we are happy, acting in ways that fit our principles and beliefs.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is different with libertarianism as determinism believes that we were already determined by certain causes outside of the power of will, while libertarianism believes in the theory that we are truly free in our choices. They also disagree on the idea of responsibility; determinist does not believe we can be responsible when we have no free will, while libertarians think differently. Although determinism and libertarianism have little to none in common, compatibilism can bring them together. The way that free will is compatible with determinism is called compatibilism. Although compatibilism and libertarianism are similar, they can also be quite different.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All these ideas seem be based on loose speculation that don’t have much merit in terms of the bigger picture. Proponents of the Libertarian view on free will would argue that free will is independent of agents of causation therefore, actions are based only on whether the individual desires to complete the action. At its core, Libertarianism rejects determinism and focuses on ideas that concern themselves with liberal independence. I would respond by stating that, actions need foundations from which they are based on. Human nature checks free will by allowing for a reason for actions being chosen and executed.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Those who believe in this idea are called “hard” determinists, which they deem no one is responsible for their actions. However, the alternative to hard determinism is Libertarianism. Libertarianism is the act of believing humans are free from determinism and its forms. Libertarians believe that determinism and free will cannot be as one. Moreover, they believe freedom requires indeterminism.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free Will Vs Determinism

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Denial, there are two premises. Denial of the first premise in which Soft Determinist David Hume maintains that determinism is true and correlates with free will and moral responsibility (i.e. meaning that freedom of choice is only valid in moral responsibility by personal motive, regardless of casual determination). Denial of the second premise derives from Libertarian Richard Taylor, who disagrees with determinism because human actions are “uncaused” and intelligible. He uses “uncaused” as a term referring to actions not caused by factors external to the agent (i.e.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s interpretation of evil is defined by what an individual posits as a universal moral maxim. Kant believes that in order to be completely moral you must have your will and your willkur agree with each other and act accordingly to your will. He believes that you are committing an act of radical evil if your motives are in your own self-interest. To be moral a person must do his or her duty for duty’s sake. He takes out all prior feelings and emotions in order to not corrupt the integrity of morality.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also reckons we need freedom to create an enlightened society and achieve happiness. However, how difficult is it to uphold the moral law? To answer this question from a Kantian point of view, any action performed must be done from a duty to the highest moral law in order to have any moral worth. What determines whether an action has moral worth or not is the maxim. Freedom ends when your choices begin to affect other people and morality is universal.…

    • 1793 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    These are the actions in which someone is acting on antecedent factors and experience. In my worldview, humans seem to only ever act on experience. However, with Kant’s idea of the noumenal world and the rational decisions he attempts to save moral freedom. The idea that someone makes a decision not based on experience or prior factors is a hard pill to swallow. The noumenal world is a theoretical construct that Kant introduces to save us from a deterministic worldview in which everything is determined by causality.…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Either they accept determinism and see free will as an illusion, or they believe in free will, and find determinism to be untrue. Roderick M. Chisholm is one of these people, but we will not be discussing his work here. Other philosophers known as compatibilists, believe that the two ideas may accompany one another. This is the view we shall focus on. British philosopher, A. J. Ayer, defends the view that causal determinism is compatible with free will and moral responsibility.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays