My stance is that along as there are NO breaches of the Constitution or other important documents, then reporting to international agencies or committees should be permissible. It should be proper to report only health diagnostics or of any sort that will benefit the health of citizens. That being said required reporting to international agencies or comities should only be about health, security, etc.
Do you think it is necessary and/or ethical to be monitoring health in other countries? Give reasons for your answer.
It is not necessary for the U.S. to monitor other countries, as that would breach the fourteenth amendment “equal protection of the laws.” To elaborate there is the neutrality law that was implemented in 1789, that clearly restricts the U.S. from going to war, spying on other countries, etc., without the proper justification to do so. Thus, a breach of the fourteenth amendment would cause “moral friction.” Additionally, it would not be ethical for the U.S. to monitor health in other countries, as other countries are in charge of their own affairs, such as, health. It is up to those countries taking care of their citizens, not the U.S.; the U.S. should ONLY worry about their own citizen’s health. …show more content…
As mentioned above, there should be no monitoring of the U.S. on the health of other countries, thus this question is negligible to answer.
What should be done if institutions responsible for protecting national sovereignty want to deny access to
Do you think it is necessary and/or ethical to be monitoring health in other countries? Give reasons for your answer.
It is not necessary for the U.S. to monitor other countries, as that would breach the fourteenth amendment “equal protection of the laws.” To elaborate there is the neutrality law that was implemented in 1789, that clearly restricts the U.S. from going to war, spying on other countries, etc., without the proper justification to do so. Thus, a breach of the fourteenth amendment would cause “moral friction.” Additionally, it would not be ethical for the U.S. to monitor health in other countries, as other countries are in charge of their own affairs, such as, health. It is up to those countries taking care of their citizens, not the U.S.; the U.S. should ONLY worry about their own citizen’s health. …show more content…
As mentioned above, there should be no monitoring of the U.S. on the health of other countries, thus this question is negligible to answer.
What should be done if institutions responsible for protecting national sovereignty want to deny access to