Case 6i: Is it morally acceptable for children to be used in pornographic films? Does it make a difference if their parents approve?
I feel children being in pornographic films are not morally acceptable. The reason I feel like this is because it’s not the parent’s body. The child once grown will have to deal with the mental or physical issues that may occur. As parents we are to instill morals in our children. This is against the law to record a minor in pornographic settings and in my opinion for good reasons.
Case 6j: There are more than four hundred pet cemeteries in the United States. People often spend hundreds of dollars to bury their dogs, cats, birds, goldfish and hamsters. Is this practice morally acceptable?
I do feel this is an acceptable moral practice. Animal cruelty is punishable by law. I personally feel if the law can punish you for treating a pet wrong, then the only way to treat pets is like a family member. I feel like pets bond and love just like humans, and just as when our love ones dies we lay them to rest in a respectful manner. This should be no different when it comes to our pets. …show more content…
Finally, his accuser is overcome with remorse and admits having lied. When the man is released, he sues the state for wrongful imprisonment and seeks monetary compensation. The courts rule the state has no legal responsibility. But does it have a moral responsibility? Why or why not?
I do feel the state has a moral responsibility to correct what was wrong. The state took responsibility when the man was sentenced. Legally the state did was correct if the evidence should that the man was guilty, however since he was wrongfully accused then I think morally the correct thing to do is try to mend what was
I feel children being in pornographic films are not morally acceptable. The reason I feel like this is because it’s not the parent’s body. The child once grown will have to deal with the mental or physical issues that may occur. As parents we are to instill morals in our children. This is against the law to record a minor in pornographic settings and in my opinion for good reasons.
Case 6j: There are more than four hundred pet cemeteries in the United States. People often spend hundreds of dollars to bury their dogs, cats, birds, goldfish and hamsters. Is this practice morally acceptable?
I do feel this is an acceptable moral practice. Animal cruelty is punishable by law. I personally feel if the law can punish you for treating a pet wrong, then the only way to treat pets is like a family member. I feel like pets bond and love just like humans, and just as when our love ones dies we lay them to rest in a respectful manner. This should be no different when it comes to our pets. …show more content…
Finally, his accuser is overcome with remorse and admits having lied. When the man is released, he sues the state for wrongful imprisonment and seeks monetary compensation. The courts rule the state has no legal responsibility. But does it have a moral responsibility? Why or why not?
I do feel the state has a moral responsibility to correct what was wrong. The state took responsibility when the man was sentenced. Legally the state did was correct if the evidence should that the man was guilty, however since he was wrongfully accused then I think morally the correct thing to do is try to mend what was