Nicholas Carr Skepticism

Superior Essays
Skepticism have always been there when technologies were newly developed along with new approaches to other methodologies. In Nicholas Carr’s article “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, Carr conveys this idea by the examples of Socrates and his resist of adopting alphabet and Squarciafico and his resist of the printing press (Carr, p.564). Nonetheless, are Carr’s skeptical attitude based on the truth? Moreover, in such development of the communication system, is it able to supersede the negative effects with positive ones? Socrates, response to the adoption of the alphabet, was particularly worried about three things. His worries included: that the written knowledge would cause to cease human memory, that writing knowledge on a substance would break …show more content…
He argues that using technologies, which boost mental capacities, will undeniably make the brains to process information as those current technologies are doing. In other words, people will eventually become distracted while they take in new knowledge, as the internet is embedded features of distractions with overabundance of information such as links, pictures, and advertisements. These features are holding people back from concentrating on texts also preventing them from making a deep thoughts related to the text that they are reading. How people are supposed to deeply envisage the points of the text if they don’t read it thoroughly and connect the text to their thoughts? Carr portrays that it is, “in the quiet spaces… undistracted reading of a book… foster our own ideas. Deep reading... is indistinguishable from deep thinking” (Carr, p.564). In Carr’s article, he undoubtedly argues that he doesn’t believe that attaining wisdom cannot be achieved using the internet and, furthermore, using internet consistently will make people become not able to read text through other

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Nicholas Carr discusses the effects of the use of technology in his essay, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” First, he points out how constant technology use causes the mind to change. In discussing his mind, Carr states how it’s “changing. [He’s] not thinking the way [he] used to think” (315). In other words, Carr believes that the prolonged hours spent on the Internet correlates with his loss of concentration after reading a few pages of an article or a novel.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carr uses his own experiences with Google to inform his readers of the negative effects that it has had on our society so far and the damage it can cause in the future. His example includes how Google has allowed our society to adapt to bad habits such as skimming carelessly, as opposed to detailed analytical reading. He supports this theory by admitting that he notices himself skimming and finding short articles online because they tend to be more convenient. Due to the Internet’s convenience and access to abundant amounts of information, people tend to lean more towards skimming because reading everything the Internet provides us thoroughly, would take too much time. Carr's overall motive is to propagate to his readers that what he sees in the future is not acceptable and that we must do something to stop technology from controlling and negatively altering our cognitive functions.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the beginning, Carr tells us about how we have benefitted from the internets unlimited information. Shortly after, Carr switches sides on his opinion about the internet and how it has reformed our brains thinking capabilities. He talks about how the internet has affected our attention span, which has also started to affect our reading and writing abilities. He says that it is affecting us this way because of the way the internet provides us information.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After almost six pages of swimming through a “sea of words,” Carr finally stumbles upon the topic mentioned in the title of his article—Google (par. 4). He picks at our brains, challenging us to get to this point in the article, testing the mental capabilities of the modern day human. Carr notes that “the Internet… [is] becoming our map, and our, clock, our printing press and our typewriter, our calculator and our telephone, and our radio and tv;” (par. 18) he expresses how all these inventions have been, in a way, beneficial to mankind.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Google-Making USupid

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Furthermore, he discusses the new thought of considering the brain as a computer, feels terrible for the loss of profound concentration, and the scholarly incitement it accommodates our brains. Carr’s theory of technology making us dumber…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nicholas Carr Rhetoric

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this article, the writer Nicholas Carr attempts to explain how is the information offered on the internet has reformed our method of intelligent. He uses several altered techniques to play on the reader’s emotions by using stories, studies, and his own reflection to try to convince the audience that the internet has been unfavorable to our intelligent and knowledge ways. For the most part of his argument is unproductive because of his organization, his choice of sources, and his tone. Carr started his article with a quote from 2001 called A Space Odyssey. He clarifies the quote, speaking about in what way the human is modernizing the PC, but then the equivalents that with how PCs have renewed his brain.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetoric Analysis: Is Google Making Us Stupid? Indents? The article by Nicholas Carr Is Google Making Us Stupid, formatting? Carr’s main argument is as the Internet has become an integral part of our society is changing the way we process information an simple way of processing information. My interpretation of Carr’s main argument is that the Internet has made it harder to process complex information and now rendering the way information is processed in a simply manner. The reason he accomplished expressing his argument in a effective manor manner (a “manor” is a large home) was his use appeal to Karos, Ethos & Logos; also, with the aid of rhetorical devices.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While I do not disagree that the internet may have made it more difficult to pay attention to the multitude of paragraphs, I find his conclusion that the internet has completely rewired our brains a bit out there. Carr admits “...we still await the long-term neurological and psychological experiments that will provide a definitive picture of how Internet use affects cognition”, thus I find it impossible to take Carr’s insistence that the Internet causing people to take up “power browsing” more often to be a sign of anything bigger (Carr). Carr’s skepticism about the at the thought of the internet supplementing our intelligence seems unjustified, as people have been supplementing their knowledge with that of other humans, books, and many other sources of information outside of the internet for generations. The fear that Carr expresses of becoming technology reliant is rather obsolete, as the world is simply shifting from print books to the same information in PDFs online. If Carr sees no issue with reading books to gain intelligence or information, there is no reason for him to fear technology when it is improving ways to do this and many other aspects of…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Numerous scholars are finding it harder and harder to stay focused; Bruce Friedman a blogger of computers in medicine called his recent way of thinking “staccato” meaning he quickly scans information without taking it all in. Even though humans are reading now more than ever because of all the easy access to information, the current reading style that human brains have developed makes a human less capable of deep reading. Since the beginning of times humans have taught themselves to read, it is not a human instinct, it is taught through the years in order to communicate and inform each other. Carr mentions how much the world has changed once the clock came into the world and humans stopped using their senses to carry out basic needs such as walking, eating, working and sleeping. Do to the internet media, advertising exists everywhere, making our minds and thoughts scatter, rewiring human’s way of thinking.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Is Google Making Us Stupid, Carr and his friends have seen a shift in their cognitive experiences because of their time online with the expansive amount of information online. Carr mentions a blogger, Bruce Friedman, and he describes that the internet has altered with his brain, “I now have almost totally lost the ability to read and absorb a longish article on the web or in print,” and Friedman said that his thinking has taken this “staccato” sort of quality to it. Not only that, he cannot even read a “blog post of more than three or four paragraphs” without having to resort to skimming (Carr 93). This sort of behavior is something that the internet is teaching not just the young, but the average adult. According to Maryanne Wolf, reading is not a skill that we use as an “instinct,” unlike the natural urge to talk and communicate with others (Carr 94).…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Matrix Dystopia

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages

    His words during a particular interview evinced his concern for this issue. He claimed that the Internet seemed to be preventing us from being able to think deeply or show the ability to focus. Carr viewed the Internet as “...a system that kept us in a state of perpetual distraction and constant disruption” (Gregoire). He also mentioned that “...psychologists and brain scientists tell us about interruptions is that they have a fairly profound effect on the way we think… [in the case of access to the Internet,] the price we pay for being constantly inundated with information is a loss of our ability to be contemplative and to engage in the kind of deep thinking that requires you to concentrate on one thing” (Gregoire). When asked about the technological impact on memory, he mentioned that “One study out of…

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to Carr (2010), reasoning has been fundamentally altered by the Internet into superficial thought processes through skimming, diversions, and facile learning. The research confirms that the ‘mental calisthenics’ involved in surfing the Internet, consequently puts even more of a strain on the brain, which then results in the lack of comprehension (Carr 2010, p. 3). For example, navigating Wikipedia, where there are numerous links to other sub-topics, have been found to considerably increase distractibility and oversimplified thinking because of the countless information the brain is inundated with, such as advertisements, formats, and others. In essence, screen technology through the loss of focus and depth of thought has radically changed cognition, which is pernicious to an intellectual…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With his general blanket term of “Internet” he by default includes encyclopedias, academic journals, classic literature, world news, and a number of other tools that today’s internet users utilize to deepen their knowledge, inspire, or educate. Mr. Carr refers to a study that texts read on the internet that have links included in them are actually harmful to our ability to understand the texts, as opposed to texts read from a paper. “People who read text studded with links, the studies show, comprehends less than those who take in information in a more sedate and focused manner.”…

    • 1055 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carr explains his experiences with google and modern technology. For example, Carr says that because of google, he can no longer read in-depth pieces of writing. This is the same for others as well, talking about his friends, Carr says “The more they use the web, the more they have to fight to stay focused on long pieces of writing” (1). Avery Stroman, who wrote a paper regarding his thoughts on Nicholas Carr 's paper and how he feels about google says “I allowed the presence of Facebook, Twitter, and email to prevent me from reading his entire article without stopping. Without thinking, I switched from the article at hand to the internet” (79).…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We are all familiar with this term “Just Google It”, this is one of the most used term when we do not spend our time on research and rely on the internet and other people’s knowledge and expertise, to educate ourselves. Ultimately it transformed us from critical thinkers to lazy robots, that pretty much accepts anything available on the internet. Since we are too lazy to do our own researches. I was alarmed after reading the article and that it is not only me, but people around me. Carr could be right, that our modern society may turn out to be increasingly stupid and leave expended speculation in the past with pen and paper, text.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays