Illegal Insider Trading

Great Essays
Introduction to Insider Training:
Insider trading, usually referred with the negative connotative meaning, is the trading of non-public information among shareholders to gain a personal profit or prevent any possible losses. The violation of this practice can be denoted by stating that “Illegal insider trading refers generally to buying or selling a security, in breach of a fiduciary duty or other relationship of trust and confidence, while in possession of material, nonpublic information about the security” (“Insider Trading”, 2014), in which infractions include “revealing non-public company info to major shareholders who, in effect, withdraw large amounts of stock. Although there are a few benefits of insider trading such as creating stability,
…show more content…
I started off purchasing 3 companies’ stocks disturbing my buy evenly on McDonald’s, Verizon, and Texas Instruments which were chosen from a list of “trading cards” of some companies in the news that day. On day one, I’ve already noticed that Verizon stocks were decreasing in market value and I was incurred a loss of 10%. So I made the decision to gradually sell off the remaining shares and 40 shares of McDonalds over the next few days. After which, I invested in LinkedIn and Palo Alto Networks by holding 20 and 21 shares respectively . I’ve detected that this significantly increased my overall gains and Return percentage to 1.05% by November 10 which was halfway the stock trading game simulation period. By now, I’ve gained some knowledge towards choosing the right companies that allowed me to maximize my total equity and acquire positive overall return percentage gain by analyzing the each company’s growth in value per day time series graph and exec price on that particular day. However, since this is a game simulation, I found myself being ranked among six other players who joined my game being ranked by the overall return value and any gains/losses in market stock. So, initially, I thought …show more content…
The purpose of this act was to clarify the ambiguity of the legality of trading on the knowledge gained during the course of official duties for members of Congress ("A Primer on... The STOCK Act"). This law prohibits members and employees of Congress, and employees in the Executive and Judicial branches of the federal government from using "any nonpublic information derived from the individual 's position… or gained from performance of the individual 's duties, for personal benefit” ("What is the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act? - Insider Trading by Congress - ProCon.org", 2012). The Act makes it lucid that government officials and employees have a duty to be honest to United States consumers and not to siphon off nonpublic information to make a profit. Therefore, it is mandatory that members of Congress and government employees report certain investment transactions within 45 days after a trade and that the information in public financial disclosure reports be made available on agency websites and searchable databases ("FACT SHEET: The STOCK Act: Bans Members of Congress from Insider Trading", 2012). The Martha Stewart case is a hallmark case for demonstrating the illegal aspects of insider trading. Delving deeper into this incident shows that the CEO of a biopharmaceutical company named ImClone System had instructed his broker to inform

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Introduction to Insider Trading Insider trading is the act of gaining access to confidential trade information through the stock exchange and using it for a personal advantage. Inside traders essentially know before a company’s stock plummets, and they have the advantage to trade and sell those shares before the rest of the general public does. Insider trading is currently illegal, but there are numerous people who are trying to legalize it. There are two viewpoints of Insider trading: Those who are for it believe insider trading can increase the value of certain stocks and those who are against it believe insider trading disfigures the market system unfairly. In this field research study both views will be evaluated along with evidence of participation in a…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rule 10b-5 bars any person from making a misstatement or omission of material fact in relation to the purchase or sale of any security. The wrongful act was in association with the national securities exchange, which is one of the requirements of Rule 10b-5. A purchaser of a security is able to sue an auditor who has misstated or omitted a material fact without requiring privity. The defendant must have acted with scienter, intent to deceive, which isn’t the case in this situation therefore I wouldn’t be found liable under Rule 10b-5. (Mallor, 2010, p. 1202) IV.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Norton (2002), believed that WorldCom alone should not be blamed for the reactions of the market and the economy. He stated that the blame is on the accounting legislation and regulations, and that WorldCom was just a result. As for the effect on the economy, he considered that to be part of the business cycle. The Imclone scandal in 2002 included insider-trading charges against the former CEO. After the FDA rejected a new drug, the CEO sold his shares.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sarbanes Oxley Act In the effort to reduce corporate power, Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act “in 2002 to protect investors form the possibility of fraudulent accounting activities by corporations,” (Root 2015). In response to all the scandals reported involving major corporations like Enron, Tyco, and WorldCom, liability was made to corporate responsibility as investors and shareholders suffered major losses due to financial and accounting obstructions from those within the company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act “created an accounting oversight board that required corporations to establish codes of ethics for financial reporting and to develop greater transparency in financial reports to investors and other interest parties,” (Ferrell,…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The mechanism of noticing the fraud detection hotline is absent in the Kmart. Accounting issues and impacts The actual scandal of the Kmart can be classified as an issue of recognizing the allowances prematurely on the basis of false information provided by the company’s accounting department. The number of vendor representatives co-signed the false and the misleading accounting documents and provided the false or misleading third party confirmations to Kmart’s independent auditor. As a whole, the inflated revenues of the company increased the stock value of the company shares in the market falsely. The internal control mechanism of Kmart did not evaluate the possible scandal in the financial statement of the company neither did it flag the issue.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It’s ridiculous that representatives would claim that their ratings are merely “opinions” and that they had no responsibility. (Inside Job) Can you imagine your home inspector saying their inspection was merely opinion and not standing by their work? In 2015 Standard & Poor’s agreed to a settlement of $1.4 Billion dollars for their role in the crisis. (Fortune, 2015) The derivatives market absolutely should have had more regulation. Complex new investments were being developed that were not regulated and frankly regulators might not have understood.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the CommercEducation blog titles “Historical cost vs. market (fair) value” dated April 15, 2011 states “market value accounting reveals economic realities that are hidden by historical cost accounting.” Unlike historical cost, fair value limits a company’s ability to manipulate its reported net income. The gains or losses from assets and liabilities are reported in the period at which they occur. For instance, the Savings and Loan Crisis (S&L) scandal. This scandal was a big hit to make American realize that historical cost leads to a web of political corruption. The thrift managers of S&L commit fraud against depositors by using high interest rates and lent the money to their allies without a collateral.…

    • 2033 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nava Pros And Cons

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Precedent and politics could limit the President’s legal ability to engage in partisan activities. For example, President Clinton self-imposed the Hatch Act’s limitation on using federal funds for political activities and installed a campaign-only fax machine in the White House. The Hatch Act prohibits federal employees from using their authority to influence political activity. It does permits federal employees engagement in non-partisan voter registration. The Act states: “an employee may take an active part in political management or in political campaigns, except an employee may not—(1) use his official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, the term speaks to both legal and illegal actions. According to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (n.d.) (SEC), Insider trading as a legal action, addresses when corporate insiders-officers, directors, and employees-buy and sell stock in their own companies. In situations of legal insider trading, they are required to…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Insider Trading Law

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the case of insider trading, dealing in the financial products in a manner that constitutes acquiring, disposing them and entering into an agreement to either acquire or dispose, amounts to trading. Procuring another person to trade and the communication of insider information also amounts to a transaction prohibited within the act. The challenging question embedded in R v Evans was whether to treat the agreement as a normal contractual agreement for sale or purchase or it should be fashioned as conspiracy in the criminal perspective. The court was guided by the latter in this case since the entire act fulfilled the actus reus element of a crime. A person may be guilty of procuring if he encourages or induces an act to done even though it is not beneficial to him.…

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics