Robert Calloway Case Summary

Great Essays
9. Laura’s allegations
a. Fact: Laura found the shortfall and repayment, she reported to Robert Calloway, the Chair of the Audit Committee. Robert arranged a meeting with Tony and Doug to look in to Laura’s allegations. They lied and denied all the allegation and Robert believed them without investigation.
b. Issue: Did Robert violate fiduciary duty?
c. Answer: Yes
d. Rationale: Robert violated the fiduciary duty of care which requires directors and officers to use care and diligence when acting on behalf of the corporation, as a member of the board of directors, Robert didn’t make any reasonable investigation of this matter, he violated duty of care.

a. Fact: Tony and Doug lied in the meeting, and slandered that Laura was a disgruntled employee
…show more content…
Rationale:
1. Under Tort law, Tony and Doug lied to Robert, their behavior was a fraud and violated the fiduciary duty of care, what they said didn’t in good faith and was harmful to the company.
2, Tony and Doug violated section 10(b) and rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by making untrue statement of a material fact willfully.

a. Fact: Laura was fired by Doug after the meeting.
b. Issue: Can Doug fire Laura legally for her behavior?
c. Answer: No
d. Rationale: SOX 806 protect employees who provide evidence of fraud. Section 1107 of SOX makes it a crime to retaliate against a whistleblower for disclosing truthful information to a law enforcement officer. So Doug fired Laura violated SOX 806 and will be punishable by fine or imprisonment up to 10 years under SOX 1107.

10. Certifying the financial reports
a. Fact: Doug and Sam file statements certifying the accompanying financial reports and management report when filing the SEC Form 10K.
b. Issue: Did Doug and Sam violate Sarbanes-Oxley Act?
c. Answer: Yes
d. Rationale:
1. SOX 302 stated that the management has responsibility for financial reports. The CEO and CFO must prepare the financial statements fairly and make full disclosures. Doug and Sam didn’t present the financial statements fairly and willfully certified the reports which contained material
…show more content…
Fact: Vanderbilling Equity Fund buys shares totaling over 10 million and XYZ bank lends HOLO based on the financial reports. Six months later, when the embezzlement and cover-up are revealed, the stock prices of HOLO drop drastically, Vanderbilling Equity Fund and XYZ filed lawsuits.
b. Issue: Were Doug, Sam, Tony, PPW, and HOLO liable for this lawsuits?
c. Answer: Yes
d. Rationale:
1. Common law fraud. HOLO issued false financial reports and hided the embezzlement on purpose, Tony willfully expressed the unqualified opinion on financial statements and internal controls. This was a fraud.
2. Under the section 10(b) and rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, it is unlawful to employ any device, scheme or artifice to defraud and to make any untrue statement of a material fact. HOLO’s directors and officers willfully violated these rules.
3. Their conduct is a criminal offense, and violated SOX 1106 which also amends section 32(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by knowingly to make any false statement that required to be filed with the SEC, penalties for intentional violations from 1 million to 5 million and imprisonment from 10 years to no more than 20 years, for the companies, the fines from $2.5 to $25

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Stewart lied when she told the Securities and Exchange Commission, the FBI and federal prosecutors she had prearranged with Bacanovic to sell ImClone when it fell well below $60 per share. The second count against Martha Stewart is that of conspiracy. This was filed against Stewart and Bacanovic. The charge alleges that Stewart and Bacanovic willfully and knowingly worked together to obstruct justice and make false statements in the stock trading scandal (Leite, 2012). The third charge against Stewart is that of false statements.…

    • 1956 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Nixon was aware that he needed to remove the three men from office in a way that would seem natural and not be related to the scandal in any way to protect himself. Nixon by being involved in the scandal he acted through his agents in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens. Nixon knowingly misused the executive power by interfering with agencies of the executive branch during the investigation of his administration. By doing this, he betrayed the trust of the government further than before. Off the tapes he had recorded in secret, eighteen minutes were missing raising further suspicion against Nixon and the others involved in the scandal.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kozlowski, Swartz, and Belnick were all accused of selling their stock without informing shareholders, which under the Securities and Exchange Commission is a requirement. The Securities and Exchange Commission(SEC), the Manhattan D.A. and Tyco all pursued cases against Kozlowski, Swartz, and other former corporate officials on various charges which included: fraud, grand larceny, and falsifying regulatory filings. The SEC originally began an investigation on Tyco in 1999 after an analyst reported questionable accounting practices (SEC). The investigation revolved around the suspicious accounting principles of the company’s acquisitions, including a practice known as “spring-loading” (Forbes).…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Illegal Insider Trading

    • 2049 Words
    • 8 Pages

    I started off purchasing 3 companies’ stocks disturbing my buy evenly on McDonald’s, Verizon, and Texas Instruments which were chosen from a list of “trading cards” of some companies in the news that day. On day one, I’ve already noticed that Verizon stocks were decreasing in market value and I was incurred a loss of 10%. So I made the decision to gradually sell off the remaining shares and 40 shares of McDonalds over the next few days. After which, I invested in LinkedIn and Palo Alto Networks by holding 20 and 21 shares respectively . I’ve detected that this significantly increased my overall gains and Return percentage to 1.05% by November 10 which was halfway the stock trading game simulation period.…

    • 2049 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The lawsuit alleges that Arthur Andersen ignored a number of clear warning signs. One was lunch that one of its auditors had with an accountant who had recently resigned from BFA. She allegedly told the auditor that BFA regularly inflated the value of its assets and covered up financial losses. A second warning sign was that several midlevel employees of BFA left the foundation at around the same time. Finally, there was an anonymous phone call made in 1997 from a person who warned of the illegal practices BFA was engaging in.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The internal control mechanism of Kmart did not evaluate the possible scandal in the financial statement of the company neither did it flag the issue. However the business failed in short time and ultimately caused…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Auditors are therefore required to feature professional skepticism as it ensures due alertness to the processes at the company hence avoid cases of fraud. Red Flags of Fraud The auditor will follow given steps in order to establish whether or not there is a case of fraud in the operations. The auditor will look for the red flags, which are indications in the event that there is a case of fraud within any given organization. The red flags that the auditor will look for are Managements ' characteristics and influence • Financial actions that are noticeably aggressive by the management • Flaws in the characters and personality of the top management officials such as the CEO • Efforts by management to conceal given financial…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    manager; 3. She suffered from severe emotional distress from being fired as a result of Carl’s false statements; and 4. Carl’s false statements were the cause of her termination (but for Carl lying to the H.R. manager, she would still have her job, p. 145). Defamation – Slander (p. 514): 1.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He, too, deceived not only Hester and Pearl, but himself as well by going against his calling as a minister. While each main character betrayed another in a different way, their response to the consequences reveals the motivation behind their deceit. The first betrayal in the novel is committed by Hester Prynne. In The…

    • 1311 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Enron Scandals In Auditing

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There are several reasons behind such drastic change. Firstly, the culture was such that there was no encouragement of ‘whistle-blowing’, the management was filled with greed and fame and as a result did not advocate about the true position of the firm. In a study of the scandal of Enron, Li (2010) shows evidence of the corruption of the senior-level employees at Enron when during a conference call, an analyst questioned the balance sheet of Enron and the executive Mr Skilling swore at the analyst. Through a loss of confidence by the public, the departure of Jeffrey Skilling in early 2001 brought about more suspicion in regards to the firm’s truthfulness. Enron Vice President Sharron Watkins memorandum sent to Kenneth Lay set in movement the unrevealing and exposure of Enron’s corruption (Beenen & Pinto, 2009).…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays