What Is Qwest?

Decent Essays
WorldCom had recently been caught up in an accounting scandal, forcing the SEC to take a closer look into many large corporations’ accounting procedures. One of these corporations was Qwest Communications. While looking into Qwest, the SEC determined that Qwest had been improperly following the accounting guidelines and had inflated their revenue by billions.
In 2004, the SEC charged Qwest Communications International Inc. with securities fraud and other violations of the federal securities laws. Qwest agreed to a judgment without confirming of denying guilt. The judgment enjoins Qwest from violating the antifraud, reporting, books and records, internal control, proxy, and securities registration provisions of federal securities laws. The judgment requires Qwest to
…show more content…
Joseph Nacchio, former Chairman and CEO, was convicted of 19 counts of insider trading in Qwest stock in 2007. He was also ordered to pay a fine of $19 million and forfeit $52 million from illegal stock sales. Afshine Mohebbi, former President and COO, was later cleared of all charges in 2011. Robin Szeliga, former CFO, pled guilty to one count of insider trading.
Roger Hoaglund agreed to a settlement. He paid a civil penalty of $100,000 and disgorgement of $200,000 plus prejudgment interest.
William Evelth also agreed to a settlement. He paid a civil penalty of $75,000 and disgorgement of $35,575 plus prejudgment interest. He was also prohibited from acting as an officer or director in any public company for five years.
Robert Woodruff, former CFO, was found to be liable for disgorgement of $1,731,048, plus prejudgment interest of $640,427. He also is required to pay a civil penalty of $300,000, and is prohibited him from acting as an officer or director of a public company for a period of five

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Case citation Daniel Dickens v. Alliance Analytical Laboratories, LLC, 111 P. 3d 889; 2005 Wash.App.433 Factual background and procedural posture AAL is a L.L.C found by Ms. Anne Cote and Mr. Gary Lukehart in 2001. At the beginning, Ms. Anne Cote approached Mr. Gary Lukehart with a business plan to start a chemical company in Yakima, Washington and a disclaimed that she was very wealthy. AAL has two members, Ms. Cote and RSRT, L.L.C, which was found by Mr. Lukehart for the sole purpose as a member of AAL. Both Ms. Cote and Mr. Lukehart were named managers at AAL.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yoely Brach Case Summary

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Honorable Judge Schmidt: We are confused and baffled by Isaac Oberlander’s demands and ultimatums. Firstly, let us set the record straight: Yoely Brach (“Yoely”) is the defendant and should not dictate the terms of any arbitration proceedings. The fact remains that Mr. Jacob Guttman, the owner of Court Street Office Supplies, Inc. (“Company”), employed Yoely – right out of Kollel with no formal or general education – out of kindheartedness and compassion to his son-in-law. As Yoely mistook his father-in-law’s unselfishness for weakness, he engaged in erratic behavior, breached his fiduciary duties to the Company, and embezzled the Company by hundreds of thousands of dollars.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dalla L. Myers Summary

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On February 25, 2008, the United States District Court saw a case between Darla L. Meyers and LHR, INC. Plaintiff Darla L. Myers financed a vehicle sometime prior to February 9, 2001. The financing responsibility was then transferred to LHR, Inc. sometime before February 9, 2005 with S & P for collections. Myers is alleging there is a violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and for violations of California’s business and Professions Code § 17200.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Glendeniable Instruments

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit presented two similar cases in which both taxpayers did not report money received for punitive damages and treble damages as gross income. 1.- In Commisioner of Internal Revenue vs Glenshaw Glass Company, Glenshaw, a manufacturer of glass bottles and containers legally disputed against Hartford Empire Company which manufactured machinery used by Glenshaw. Among the claims set by Glenshaw were demands for exemplary damages for fraud and treble damages for injuring its business due to violations of antitrust law by Hartford Empire. Eventually, Hartford paid Glenshaw $800,000 out of which $324,529.94 were presented as punitive damages and as consequence were not reported as income for the tax year involved.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Soon after, auditors determined that HealthSouth falsified over $2.7 billion in profits. The fraud was so extensive and widespread that it included fifteen executives of HealthSouth, including five of its CFOs since the 1980s. All fifteen of them plead guilty to purposefully misleading investors or auditors through use of fraudulent accounting. Richard Scrushy was repeatedly identified as the leader of the fraud although he denied all accusations. In 2003 he was indicted by the Department of Justice on 85 counts of conspiracy, money laundering, mail fraud, and securities fraud.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sec's Complaint

    • 73 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The SEC’s allegations in the complaint revolved around seven different accounting practices. But in the end, the main purpose and effect of these manipulative actions was to accelerate Xerox's revenue recognition at the cost of future periods. According to SEC’s complaint, “Xerox fraudulently disguised these actions so that investors remained unaware that the company was meeting earnings expectations only by using accounting maneuvers that could compromise future results” (“Xerox Settles SEC Enforcement,”…

    • 73 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ge Accounting Violations

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On August 4, 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) fined General Electric Company (GE), $50M for reporting false and misleading financial statements. The transactions occur were not in compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Furthermore, the four accounting violations occur in 2002 and continued through 2003. The SEC identified risks that uncovered four separate accounting violations, and GE corrected the last of the violations in 2008. The violations are as follows:  Beginning in January 2003, an improper application of the accounting standards to GE's commercial paper funding program to avoid unfavorable disclosures and an estimated approximately $200 million pre-tax charge to earnings.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Should Sealand Securities Co., Ltd. be responsible for these entrust holding agreements with 20 more financial institutions that two rogue employees involved with a forged seal? The answer is yes, but Sealand Securities Co., Ltd should not take the whole responsibilities for this case because it is also a victim of its former employees’ unethical actions. According to the statement from department of human resource of Sealand Securities Co., Ltd., Yang Zhang resigned his position on August 1st and Liang Guo’s working contract expired in August. Technically to say, both of them are no longer the company’s employees and their actions were irrelevant with Sealand Securities Co., Ltd.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Barclays Scandal

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Question 1: Who is hurt and who benefits from the manipulation of LIBOR? I would say that the banks are because of the shortage of regulation from the government in partnership with the banks, shoppers and economies globally square measure hurt by the LIBOR scandal. Attributable to the speed manipulation, banks in numerous countries borrowed capital from lenders at rates higher or not up to a number of their competitors. The result was passed on to shoppers in those countries United Nations agency hold accounts or potential accounts with those banks. The shoppers were ready or unable to borrow a lot of or less funding from the banks, which might possible are accustomed open businesses, purchases homes and cars.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Identify accounting rules of revenue recognition and describe the inadequacies in accounting context of using bill-and-hold to recognize revenue at Halliburton. According to the accounting principle revenue recognition, it is the function when revenue is reported and recognized when a function has occurred. Under GAAP, revenue recognition should recognize a measurable amount of revenue once a certain transaction has been fully made.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ernst & Young LLP was founded in 1894 and its located in New York, New York with additional offices in the United States, Middle East, Australia, Europe, and Asia. It specializes in providing auditing, assurance, technology and security risk, enterprise risk management, transaction support, merger, and acquisition, actuarial and real estate advisory services as well as many other services. The company the company in the scandal was Weatherford International is one of the biggest multinational oil and natural gas service companies. It provides varies services and products such as for drilling, evaluation, completion, production and intervention of oil and natural gas wells.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He had weighed the consequences and decided to further his company even though he was committing all kinds of…

    • 2208 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Erik Peterson Case

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He was a transaction and task manager who mired himself in the day-to-day tasks which should be handled by his appropriate staff. He circumvented procuring reports from Andrews and went directly to his direct reports to obtain decision on prime suppliers, scheduling companywide meetings. Inability to manage up or across organizationally with Hardy and CEO, His direct reports, internal and external customers. The promotion and salary offering to his secretary was not HR approved. He worked the zoning issues and relinquished that task to the Corporate staff…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Worldcom Fraud Essay

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The fraud was perpetrated in two ways. First, reserve accounts were drawn down to boost earnings. However, when the reserve accounts eventually ran out of money, Scott Sullivan ordered the accounting staff to treat line costs, which should have been treated as expenses, as capital assets. This accounting treatment was against the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which should have been used by WorldCom’s accounting department. By classifying the line costs as capital expenditures instead of expenditures, WorldCom was able to write off the line costs over a longer period of time giving the company an instant boost to current profits while showing an increase to assets in the balance sheet.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    De Guzman and the two directors done a fraudulent or bad faith on their duty as directors of Cheap Pharma Inc. for buying the share of Green Med without filling a new resolution with the approval of Board Directors, because every votes should count in every decision of a corporation. Moreover, the three directors divested the shareholdings of Green Med in their personal interest. In the Corporation Code provides that a directors is liable for damage for certain acts that constitute a violation of its fiduciary duties, such as voting for or assenting to patently unlawful acts of the corporation or for gross negligence or bad faith in directing the affairs of the corporation or acquiring any personal or pecuniary interest in conflict with their duty as such directors. Any act or omission or a director that constitutes a violation of his fiduciary duties can be ground for removal of cause, and cause of action for damages.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays