The Insanity Defense

Superior Essays
The Insanity Defense
A serious American contemporary issue is the use of the insanity defense. The insanity defense is when a person being accused of a crime are legally sane but were not in the right state of mind when the crime had taken place. The insanity defense is a chance to help the person who was not in the normal state of mind. This defense is a compromise of society and law because not all mental ailments can be proven or disproven. The benefits of the insanity defense include rehabilitation, preservation of life and finding out if the person is a real criminal or not.
A common misconception that citizen’s think about the insanity defense is that it is being overused. Citizens think the insanity defense is used for criminals to
…show more content…
The Durham rule was made to be a simple rule or test to remove the M’Naughten Rule. The Durham rule states a person cannot be convicted of a crime if the act was in correlation to a mental disorder. Does not require a medical diagnosis. However, this now requires to have expert testimony. West 's Encyclopedia of American Law, explains the Durham rule, “an accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease." It required a jury 's determination that the accused was suffering from a mental disease and that there was a causal relationship between the disease and the act.”
The "Irresistible Impulse" Test came after the M’Naughten rule. This does not only test cognitive, but how well one can resist impulse. To prove the impulse test is to first identify if there is mental illness, then to see if the mental illness caused the lack to control or actions to conform to law and society. This test can help the court consider who needs help or if it just an ordinary criminal. If a person is legally sane, that person should be able to maintain control unless there is an underlying issue. To test the impulse is just to get a feel and to know how that person
…show more content…
IDRA replaced the ALI test, so that it will make it harder for a person to obtain a verdict of not guilty on by reason of insanity (NGRI). “Congress passed and the president signed into law the Insanity Defense Reform Act (IDRA) of 1984. Legally, this new insanity defense test replaces the American Law Institute 's test (ALI, 1962), in federal jurisdictions. Substantively, Congress chose to lop off the volitional prong of ALI, leaving only the cognitive prong, which is itself a semantic restatement of the M 'Naghten rule” (Finkel 1). Although the Insanity defense is questioned and has negative views, it is a very helpful defense for those who are sane, but commited a crime.The insanity defense helps preserve life and gives second chances. Citizens need to understand that there are many laws in place to help this denfense only to be used when necessary. The insanity defense is a plea that helps figure out the real criminal versus humans who need help and rehabilitation. Delusion is irrelevant and so is any form of intoxication and most citizens do not realize that. Statistics have proven the use and effectiveness of this

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    After the guilty verdict, but before sentencing, the State abandoned its request for the death penalty in light of false testimony by one of its expert psychiatric witnesses. In2002 she went to trial and she was sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole after 40 years. The verdict was overturned on appeal. Her case placed the M'Naghten Rules with the Irresistible Impulse Test, a legal test for sanity, under close public scrutiny in the United States. In order to rules a case under the M'naghten rules there;s have to be clean proved that, at the time of the committing of the act, the party accused was labouring under such a defect of reason , from the disease of the mind , as not to know the nature and quality of the act, the party accused was doing or if he did know it , that he did not know what was wrong ..…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To the contrary, the legal definition shows that it is a very serious mental illness and cannot just be thrown around. This change in definition helps the reader to better understand the verdicts and helps them to see the legal system in a logical way. In this particular case, the lawyers that Dr. Lunde was testifying against were trying to use the insanity plea in order to protect their client when in reality it was just hurting them and making them appear desperate. Dr. Lunde’s words on the topic unveil some of the cheats used in the legal…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Serial Killers Essay

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited

    According to law, a person is “not guilty by reason of insanity” if they do not have the capacity to know right from wrong, therefore;…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So the mental disorder or defect causes impairment in the person’s ability to appreciate or control their behavior, which then results in the criminal offense. It is important to recognize that the mere coexistence of a mental disorder and a criminal offense does not prove insanity; you have to be able to show the direct connection of how the disorder or defect influenced or caused the criminal…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mrs. Andrea Yates past life showed that she has had a history of mental illness. Mrs. Andrea Yates had been brought to the hospital many times for strings of mental cases that she had received treatment for because she had harsh depression and the depression came due to psychosis. One time when Yates was in the hospital, she was described as an intensely psychotic woman. Yates has tried many times to commit suicide; for instance one time she tried to overdose by using antidepressants and even after that did not work she attempted to murder herself by stabbing herself. Yates has been through unfavorable paranoia.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tests for insanity include M’Naghten Rule and the American Law Institute Model Penal Code. The M’Naghten Rule focuses on whether defendant knew nature of the crime or understood right from wrong at the time the crime was committed. Under the American Law Institute (ALI) a defendant may be found not guilty by reason of insanity if lacking either cognitive or volitional (irresistible impulse) capacity. The ALI test provides “A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity either to the appreciate the criminality (wrongfulness) of his conduct or to conform this conduct to the requirements of the law” (Goldstein. Morse, & Packer, 2013, p.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That’s not important in the jury room (Grishman 107)”. The insanity plea is used for a wide variety of cases. Part of the outcome is that the accused convicts of the cases believed that they were legally insane while committing the crime. Furthermore, a majority of the insanity pleas is rejected which makes it extremely rare to follow through. Through such cases, the insanity plea is commonly used as an excuse to prevent themselves from going to prison.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This verdict can often be mistaken for the defence of diminished responsibility / capacity despite there being many major differences between the two. Although both are there to be used by mentally ill defendants, reason of insanity is a full defense to a crime and diminished responsibility / capacity is not. Pleading not guilty by reason of insanity is essentially equivalent to pleading not guilty, diminished responsibility / capacity is however just the defendant pleading to a lesser crime, the fact they are mentally ill is used as a mitigating factor. The law presumes that every person has free will, is responsible for their actions and should therefore be punished in accordance with the seriousness of their crime.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The insanity plea is a necessary modality for the legal system to possess; however there are many holes in the current defense that have caused criminals to find an escape, and because of this, there should be stricter stipulations in place on the…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Insanity Defense is also agreed with because people believe that those with a mental disease may not be able to think straight and therefore cannot be held accountable for their criminal…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Insanity Defense Papers

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to Morse and Richard, “some form of an insanity defense is a matter of fundamental fairness in a just society. It gives doctrinal expression to fundamental moral and legal principles that have been recognized by the common law for centuries and that the supreme court has repeatedly acknowledged (Morse, Richard, 488). Also, the insanity defense has been in the law since the 14th century and almost all state and federal law makers still agree on its importance today (Morse, Richard,…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These myths, when sustained, or affirmed, have the potential to produce consequences that undermine the intent of our criminal justice system. It is the intent of this essay to address some of the myths that are related to verdicts of not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder [NCRMD]. In doing so, this paper will focus on the following myths: those found NCRMD are…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jrank also point out that most of the cases that go very public have to deal with murders. This leads the public to think the defense is mostly used to get out of murders when in fact; sixty to seventy percent of cases deal with other crimes ranging from assault to shoplifting. As of today 46 of our 50 states have some form of insanity defense, of these 46 there are 45 that base insanity on either the M’Naghten Rule or the MPC Test (Cevallos 1). Cevallos also says that the absence of some form of the insanity defense is unconstitutional. This concept has caused many states that were torn between keeping and getting rid of the insanity plea to keep…

    • 2325 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Case Of Andrea Yates

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Texas uses a combination of the McNaughton and Irresistible Impulse Test. On the McNaughton test the defendant must be suffering from a defect or disease of the mind, not be aware of what they did it or whether it was right or wrong to be found insane. However, on the Irresistible Impulse Test if a defendant is cognitively aware of what they did was right and wrong , but cannot stop themselves from acting a certain way they can be found insane. Some psychiatrists and legal scholars have criticized both tests for failing to allow for degrees of incapacity. The presence of postpartum psychosis may significantly impair a woman 's mental stability but still not satisfy the cognitive test or even the irresistible-impulse test (Nau, McNiel, & Binder, 2012) .…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Bartol and Bartol (2011, p. 244) if an individual pleads not guilty by the circumstance of insanity, then the psychiatric evaluation should be focused on the individual 's mental state at the time of the crime. This basis is very much in line with the recommendation of Dr. Siegel in his letter to the…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays