Protecting One's Intellectual Property

Good Essays
Introduction
Intellectual property refers to establishment of one’s mind. Examples such as different creations; classical and aesthetic works; designs; and symbols, names and images used in commerce. What covers a range or personal property rights attaching to various products of the human mind is intellectual property, or also known as (IP).
The area of law, for intellectual property, deals with, for case, patents, registered designs and trademarks, which lets companies to gain recognition or benefits in financial from what they conceive or design.
Intellectual property rights can be sold or accredited, providing an important revenue stream, set your business apart from competitors, offer customers something new and different and form an essential part of your marketing or branding.
…show more content…
Protecting one’s intellectual property can be used to prevent competitions or anyone else from using the names of your products or bands, your inventions, the design or look of your products, the things you write, make and or produce for their own profit without your consent.
Keep an intellectual property a secret until it’s registered if it’s not protected by an automatic right. Once it’s available publicly, a non-disclosure agreement can’t protect an IP as it only prevents and stops another from telling anyone else about it or using it for themselves.
Understanding your rights and how the law can help you is vital and essential in securing and protecting your business’ future success. The creator’s right on the intellectual property prevents others form copying or otherwise exploiting the work actually produced by the creator. For multiple companies, IP protection is important as even from the other side of the world, they are at risk of having their concept, brands or business infringed

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Likewise, if CleverTech does not win the lawsuit, OpenTech’s decision to use the trade secrets and make them OpenSource and available to all could put CleverTech out of the race to market. Ethically, the obligation lies with the current company you work for - not a potential competitor or inflictor. Even if it seems that no harm could be done by creating an unrelated product using CleverTech’s design, the OpenSource aspect may be detrimental to the company the decision maker pays obligations too. It should also be noted that the decision maker could also be potentially sued in the dismissal of trust established by CleverTech (Martin,…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Saloomon Case Study

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The courts will not allow the Solomon principal to be used as a mechanism of deception. In Gilford Motor Co v Horne the courts described the company as a “ a stratagem…a mere cloak or sham” to avoid liability for breach of contract. The Court of Appeal referred to it as a “mere sham to cloak his wrongdoings”. Secondly Jones v Lipman, Russell J described the company as “a mask which hold before his face in an attempt to avoid recognition by the eye of equity”. This approach is an attempt to discourage wrongdoings.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Paradigm Toys must maintain and protect the confidentiality information about our competitors’ position, business strategies, contract terms and payment or any kind of reimbursement. This mean the employees can’t share any information with our competitors or even the public. Employees must be educated on the impact of sharing information and how unethical it can affect the business. The last topic is conflict of interest. This occur when personal interest tend to influence one’s ability to act in the best interest of Paradigm Toys.…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mike Lynn: Whistleblower

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cisco and ISS also had a responsibility to protect their own data and also the data of their clients to whom they provided cyber security. In future maybe the company would’ve changed its way without being exposed to lawsuits and hackers. Mike Lynn left them in a really bad situation as they had to change or modify their systems to avoid problems that were created by the leakage of company information. Mike Lynn may have done the right thing but it was still illegal and harmful to the company. It’s extremely illogical for a company to reveal its own secrets and flaws at a conference where they know it can hurt them very badly.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Employees can cause substantial damage to the network and can reduce the control that organizations have over network security. While BYOD or no BYOD won 't put off an employee who is determined to try to steal data from a company, BYOD does make it a little easier because it 's a device that they own and that 's primarily under their control (Kingsley-Hughes, 2013). Kingsley-Hughes suggest that endpoint security software can help prevent data leakage, but it can 't control data that employees have legitimate access to. Tight controls, access control, logging, and encryption are a…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Such involvement is a necessity in preventing another Enron scandal. An added necessity is independence and segregation of duties. Auditors and boards of directors must be independent to ensure such fraud cannot go undetected. If these safe guards are in place, it’s my belief that a scandal the size of Enron will not have the ability to…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Copyrights cover books, music and software, which can be a work product of your new company. It 's important to have a copyright to cover original works so they cannot be duplicated. Trademarks protect a word, name or symbol associated with the business so other companies can 't copy or infringe on the rights of the company. 5. NDA and other contracts From employee contracts to client contracts, it 's vital that you have a contract in place to protect the rights of your company.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    someone may prefer litigation because in some cases, the arbitration may not provide adequate enough settlement or solution to the dispute, not one that is necessary to truly solve the dispute. In addition, if the plaintiff were trying to sue a company for a wrong, they wouldn’t be able to do that through arbitration and be able to receive the compensation they desire. One other area where litigation is more effective is its use to expose or change harmful or illegal business practices. By taking the issue to court, the business practice is made public, so by doing so the company will be forced to change its business practices in order to still remain in business, should the case succeed, or risk losing business. In arbitration, the business is allowed to keep its affairs private, so any unlawful or harmful business practices would not be brought to public light if taken through arbitration, and the business would not be forced to alter anything.…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The application of the principle in both the above cases precludes the piercing of the corporate veil in favour of plaintiffs. The Ord decision reflects the principle, whilst Creasey takes a broader approach, which was subsequently criticised in Ord. The limited nature of the veil-piercing doctrine may cause unfairness in individual cases, as can be seen in Ord scenario; however, it is necessary to promote commercial certainty. Contingent liabilities do not appear on a balance sheet, and are difficult to quantify. Transactions such as acquisitions and restructures cannot be properly valued if the acquirer of a company’s assets is at risk of being held liable for that company’s contingent liabilities.…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They may also establish ties with other companies to block competitor's websites. This is a form of discrimination and should be prevented for the freedom and rights of people. People should not be shunned for expressing their beliefs. Websites, as well as people, can be discriminated. Websites are building blocks for communication.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays