Immanuel Kant's Philosophies

Superior Essays
This essay will analyze the similarities and differences of an ancient greek philosopher, Plato and the modern influence of Immanuel Kant. Plato’s writings are actually Socrates thoughts, Socrates was the main philosopher behind Plato’s philosophies. The philosophies were structured around, thinking your own mind/obtaining knowledge, living the good life, and the immortal soul. Kant’s philosophies can be looked at as branches from Plato’s knowledge and thought because of the gap in their lifetimes though they are independent and unrelated. Kant’s philosophies are centred around our reality of what ‘reality’ is, the categorial imperative, a utilitarian type of thought process, and synthetic judgement. Specifically being analyzed is, Plato and Kant’s difference in decision making process, similarities in the concept of a reincarnated soul, and an option of a similar combined …show more content…
The greater good is at concern for the human population for a smoother living environment. Though they may seem similar in structure they are very different in the context of the process themselves. Where Plato’s approach is a personalized, it focusses on building a character and an inner soul that can naturally react to situation and make the ‘right’ choice. Kant’s is more of a utilitarianism approach that applies to everyone on the basis of a moral law that the population respects and considers in every moral situation. The differences may seem small in hindsight but the perspectives of a personalized law with every member compared to a mutual law that is naturally agreed is a lot bigger than you may think. Where Plato’s creation of character could be different to everyone, what kind of character can be created from the beginning stage? Good or bad? Or Kant’s universal law that might not meet the individuals personal

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s Position on Justice in Comparison to Dante and Machiavelli Plato asserts his position on justice throughout “The Republic.” His views constitute a model for how society should behave based on the values presented by Socrates in the dialogue. From Plato’s teachings we can infer that to establish justice, we must establish several principles in our lives including proper education, moderation, and courage. Although Plato describes how to live a just life through the metaphorical creation of a city, as opposed to focusing on the individual or going about the concept in a more abstract manner, he also asserts that justice is the quality of the soul, and a soul can only be pure if temptations are ignored. Socrates concludes that education and obedience are parallels.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Republic, Plato initially sets out to define justice, and in this quest, illustrates the ideal society. His entire philosophy is based on the idea of parts coming together towards the whole. This applies to both the just person as well as the model state. In…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abstract Plato and Aristotle helped shape the foundations of western philosophy. Their very thoughts echo through the corridors of time and they have been immortalized in the annals of academia for ever. While both philosophers agree on a number of topics, they fundamentally represent two different schools of philosophy. Plato and Aristotle have a variety of opinions of common good, social peace, and individual happiness. This paper will compare and explain the position of the philosophers on these three topics.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant has left a large footprint in the philosophical communities. This 17th century philosopher is most famous for the concept of the “Categorical Imperative”. This theory has greatly changed the ways an individual may think about a given situation. To understand the development of this subject, it is important to inspect certain aspects of Kant’s life and to fully understand where it began to unfold. The Path, a novel written by Michael Puett and Christine Gross-Loh, brought to light some situations and implications where Kant’s logic could be tested.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant would advise Martin Luther King. Jr. to reject paternalism and address the causes of a lack of enlightenment and the preconditions necessary to make it possible for individuals to enlighten themselves. Immanuel Kant’s interpretation of enlightenment would be a general starting point for Martin Luther King to respond to Birmingham’s Racial Segregation Ordinance. Immanuel Kant’s literature on What is Enlightenment argues that the motto of enlightenment is to use your own understanding and reason, however the majority of people are content to follow the guiding institutions of society, such as the Church and the Monarchy. This fallacy is the main proponent of why individuals lack the courage to use their own reason, intellect,…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The last ethical perspective that will be reviewed is Kantianism. Kantianism is a branch of ethical philosophy that was originated by Immanuel Kant. Immanuel Kant believes a good action is only base on a good will, and when duty and will are aligned with one another. The main formulation of Kantian ethics is base on the categorical imperative. The categorical imperative is a principle of universalisability and questions if everyone in the world were to be doing the same action at the same time would the action be morally right.…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I argue that living a just life is better than living an unjust life. I am arguing it by presenting the nature of these challenges and Plato’s response to these challenges. Plato is fair in his judgement regarding living a just life is better than an unjust life given the period of his time as some of his sayings are still valid in this modern era. In the end of this essay, I am hoping to prove that he has convinced his readers that living a just life is the go to route in life. Life of Thrasymachus as a sophist challenges the idea that it is good to be just, as his view on justice is established by the weak serving the interest of the strong.…

    • 1764 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plato’s work attempts to answer questions about reality and the world we live in. Moreover his writing has received both scrutiny and praise. This writing will act as an evaluation on Plato’s theory so that we have a better view of where his theory…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Metaphysics

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Throughout history the discipline of metaphysics is not able to answer the rebuttal of nihilism, but through the lens of Heidegger, the field undertakes a metamorphose into a phoenix by going back to its core. Metaphysics is arguably a failure of a philosophy because it is never answers the question of how does it(existence) stand with being. However, that is not the only goal of metaphysics just pure speculation and observation of it will continue to advance the field. Consequently, metaphysics must be brought back to the beginning, to show the fruits of metaphysics and its success, through Desein, the historical implications of how Desein impacts Western thought, the bridge Heidegger forms with Aristotle through Desein. These observations…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was one of the most influential philosophers in the history of Western philosophy. However, Kant also had a reputation for developing difficult, not to say obscure, philosophical views. His concept of transcendental idealism was, and still is, considered to be one of the more philosophically perplexing positions. In 1769, the idea of transcendental idealism came to him and he then defined it the following year in his inaugural dissertation, On the Forms and Principles of the Sensible and Intelligible Worlds. In the next decade, he published his full argument in the first edition of the Critique of Pure Reason.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another reason I agree with Kant and not Plato is because Plato says that if you do bad, than you feel guilty. I personally do not believe that everyone is born with a good conscience, and therefore, people will not feel guilt for their actions, even if their actions are unethical. In conclusion, I strongly agree with Kant’s ethical philosophy, and even though a Kantian and egoist would arrive at the same conclusion, I believe that the way in which a Kantian would get to the conclusion is…

    • 1294 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant and Aristotle have similarities and differences when it comes to their ethical theories. Both men believed in logically understanding what was right and moral, but just in different ways. Kant mainly focused on Humans being ends rather than the means to achieving the happiest life possible. Aristotle focused on the “Golden Mean” between emotion and action. Using Sandal’s “Jumping the Queue” and “Markets in Life and Death”, Kant and Aristotle ‘s similarities and differences will become more evident.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Immanuel Kant philosophy of ethical formalism the only thing that is good is a "good will". Even if the end of an individual 's action is bad, it still would be considered a moral action along as the individual enter the action with good will. Secondly Kant strongly believed that doing "one 's duty" will be bestow with moral worth. Hypothetical imperatives regard to if one wants to completed a certain task then one needs to do a certain action or steps to complete it. Also categorical imperative is to act for the sake of duty only, can be broken down in to three separate principles.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this belief, Plato wanted the people to know that the status of good is more honorable than even truth and knowledge. He expressed this belief when he said, “Both knowledge and truth are beautiful things. But if you are to think correctly, you must think of the good as other and more beautiful than they,” (Republic, Book VI 508e). In…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays