How Does Hobbes Act Against The Law Of Nature

Improved Essays
Furthermore, one must recall that the Sovereign has an in foro interno obligation to comply with the laws of nature. This leads Hobbes to claim that, “for whatsoever is not against the law of nature, may be made law in the name of them that have the Soveraign power” (Hobbes, Leviathan, II.xxvi, 333; Van Mill 2002, 35). Thus, by not permitting the Sovereign to act against these self-evident dictates, Hobbes invalidates many forms of behavior that are indicative of a traditional tyrant. For example, the laws of nature prohibit 1) injustice (i.e., the neglect of one’s covenant or duty), 2) ingratitude, 3) non-“compleasance” (i.e., “striving to retain those things which to himselfe are superfluous, and to others necessary”), 4) refusal to grant

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, strongly supporting a sovereign government to control political and social order, debates the evils of man’s free…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes states that “in order to live a more contented life… men must give up their freedom to the State” (Document 2). He believed that people were naturally cruel and needed protection from themselves. Hobbes wanted rule by absolute monarchs. He thought it was the only way to keep people in check. His beliefs closely supported how many people thought back then.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ‘For Hobbes, the purpose of politics is to escape war. As such, he insists that in order to establish a democratic political order, all individuals need to hand over their will to a single point of ultimate authority’ (Field, 2015). Due to their beliefs on human nature, Hobbes and Machiavelli shared comparable principles with regards to the need of a sovereign ruler, and the requirement for a functioning supreme power in order to control the people. In the enlightenment period in which Hobbes wrote in his book the Leviathan about the human nature of people, he, similarly to Machiavelli, described that they were selfish and war-prone. Hobbes believed that people are not born with the understanding of what was right…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the citation from Leviathan, Hobbes is describing the law of nature which in essence is a general rule that is discovered through reason. Furthermore, such a law asserts human self-preservation and censures acts destructive to human life. As opposed to, a civil law, which must be written down and issued in order to be known. A law of nature is inherently known by all because it can be deduced by innate mental capabilities (such as reason and philosophy). Hobbes illustrated the terrors within the state of nature, in which fear reigns dominant.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke both agree that subjects shall summit to a sovereign their right and obligations such as, judgment and consequences. It can be due to both having the notion that their ideal ruler(s) should have some sort of authority towards their men. In order to guide them to peace. Also by doing this their sovereign(s) can be portrayed as superior and subject’s inferior by having more rights and entitlement than them. In other words, it creates some hierarchical system where both Hobbes and Locke ideal ruler(s) authorize all that occurs within society and subjects shall be obedient with minimal input.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    PS4217F Major Political Thinkers: Hobbes Assignment 1: What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Hobbes’ theory of civil order? Name: Denise Cher Yan Wen Matriculation Number: A0127001A Word Count: 1887 Introduction Hobbes’ theory of civil order is based on the fundamental law of nature, which is to seek peace (Hobbes 2012, 200). According to Hobbes, to seek peace is necessarily to seek peace in the condition of war, and justice is therefore a legal compliance with the terms of the social contract (Hobbes 2012, 220).…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes’ overarching argument is that the presence of a sovereign is in the people’s best interest, and thereby going against it is to go against oneself. Essentially, by implementing a sovereign, we are drawing away from the state of nature. Hobbes describes the life of man in the state of…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction At first glance, Hobbes’s theory of rule within his artificial commonwealth appears deceptively simple: an omnipotent, totalitarian sovereign who compels absolute obedience through the use of terror, fear, and the constant threat of violence. At the core of this conventional view is the common-held notion of the sovereign as a dispenser of cruel and malevolent punishment. However, a more nuanced examination of Hobbes’s treatment of the purpose and character of punishment reveals significant challenges to this one-dimensional understanding of sovereign rule. By demonstrating the rights-based (semi-liberal) nature of Hobbes’s punishment theory, this paper will present a reconceptualization of the sovereign and his relationship to…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In societies, freedoms are not always guaranteed therefore someone or something is needed to secure them. Leaders, constitutions, and military are some of the ways freedoms can be enforced and protected in society. Thomas Hobbes believes that the sovereign will and should be given absolute power because human beings need him to supply them with the security needed for their freedoms. He is a theorist of freedom, so he understands that out of human’s nature and their freedom absolutism will be the consequences. Naturally, human beings are interested in the betterment of themselves in society; whether it be in power, money, or status; human beings are naturally selfish individuals.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Right of Nature and the Law of Nature are both similar concepts described in Thomas Hobbes’ work Leviathan. These are both theories that explain what people are or are not allowed to do. The Right of Nature allows people to use their own power no matter what, so long as they deem the reason necessary. This is similar to the concept of the Law of Nature, except that in the Law of Nature they are allowed to do anything so long as it preserves the lives of themselves and others. The Right and Law of Nature, though they may seem to be old concepts, are still very much alive in today’s society (Hobbes, n.d.).…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, on the other hand, thinks that people only care about power and appetite. We want certain things and we want to get power to get those things. Hobbes’ view is that there is no such thing as responsibility. Moreover, we look at the state of nature. Locke stated that the state of nature is the state of no government; law that obliges everyone and reason.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Second Law Analysis

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The second law Hobbes derives from the first, which states that when peace and self-preservation demand it, one must be content with as much liberty as he or she would afford others against them. Hobbes discusses the elements in the first two laws and the transformations they have undertaken throughout human history under the influence of religious authority. The first criticism of political rhetoric is the confusion between ‘rights’ and ‘laws’; “confound ius and lex, right and law, yet they ought to be distinguished, because right consisteth in liberty to do or forbear, whereas Law determineth and bindeth to one of them; so that law and right differ as much as obligation and liberty, which in one and the same matter are inconsistent” (Leviathan,…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    2107 Course Short Essay: Why and What Law Introduction With reference to the state of war suggested by Thomas Hobbes, the existence of law is to restrict people and function as a routine for the people inside a state. However, there are hundreds of thousands of question about law, for instance, why there is the law, why should people follow the law, what kinds of law people should follow and so on. These questions are very difficult to answer but Summa Theologica by Thomas Aquinas answered the above well-asked question with the explanation of his philosophy. Summary of Aquinas’ Ideas Thomas Aquinas defines law as “a certain rule and measure of acts whereby man is induced to act or is restrained from acting”.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes wants the society to work together meaning giving some rights up in exchange for protection. “This equality of ability produces equality of hope for the attaining of our goals” (Thomas Hobbes). For example, if two people want something they both can’t enjoy or use then they quickly become enemies. Hobbes view, “A law of nature is a command or general rule, discovered by reason, which forbids a man to do anything that is destructive of his life or takes away his means for preserving his life, and forbids him to omit anything by which he thinks his life can best be preserved” (Leviathan, Chapter 14). Those who debate this subject often mistake right and law to be the same yet they ought to be distinguished.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believes that in order for man to be protected by other men, an ultimate supreme leader must be placed. He named this absolute ruler the “Leviathan,” a sea monster depicted in the Bible, which later became the name of his treatise (Fiero, 2011). Nevertheless, Hobbes believes that if there is no leader, then there is no justification for good or bad, no man will know if what he is doing is even wrong. He states that there is no law until a person creates it, because there is no justice or injustice in nature, but only in society (“Hobbes Leviathan,” 2012). Hobbes also includes in his treatise the Leviathan that there are two things that allow people to break free from the state of nature: Fear and reason.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays