How Did Napoleon Bonaparte Win The French Revolution

Improved Essays
Napoleon Bonaparte was a young general for the French Army during the years 1775 through 1819. When Napoleon fought in battles and wars, he believed that he could conquer land while using his devious attacking skills and tactics on other countries but a war in particular is the French Revolution. His skills and tactics involved guerrilla warfare, sneak attacking, and using new technological weapons. Napoleon used the size of his army to his advantage to defeat the countries he did. While Napoleon was the general of his magnificent army, his army was so large, the nickname for it was the “Grande Armée.” He had over 600,000 men at his disposal to use whenever he wanted. For Napoleon to keep his army in tip top shape, he had them march to …show more content…
This revolution is between Napoleon and the French versus Great Britain and King George III. Napoleon plays a major part in this war because he needs to win this to show the people his ability and to gain the needed territory. While the war goes on, King George III is trying to get the colonies in North America set up so he is fighting two battles at once. During this war, Napoleon takes total control of the government and hows its layed out. As a effect of Napoleon taking total control of the government, the French Revolution comes to an end. While Napoleon wasn't focused on either wars in progress or his own government, he was always planning ahead for the next battle or war. While Napoleon was building up his army to the highest point possible, English Reinforcements came in and lowered his army to just above 10,000 men. Since his army was so low, they ended up capturing him and taking him to an abandoned island for a brief period of time. He soon returned to power and to rule …show more content…
When Napoleon came in contact with the opponent, one of the frontal guards would take the best position possible. While these guards were distracting, new fresh troops all stocked on ammo and fresh lungs came in and were ready. These new troops try to flank the opponents. Behind the new bodies were large artillery items like mortars and cannons. They did the work that took out the other team by the group. While all was happening, men were running in trying to do one job; take out as many men as possible. Flanking was one of Napoleon’s favorite tactics because as he once said “By attacking in the flank, an army of 30,000 men might defeat an army of 100,000 men.” Rather than thinking quality over quantity, he thought differ. Napoleon would feel better and be better if he more men rather than men with a very high intelligence for tactics. This is one of Napoleon’s tactics that helped him win numerous wars and that will be inherited by other countries.

During the Revolution, Napoleon tried to live off the land he knew best. That why guerilla warfare works the best. Guerilla Warfare is the best type because you know the best high points and which valleys are easy to corner. Plus you know where the most resources and other materials are to use. In this case, Napoleon used guerilla warfare against the people from Russia know that they didn't know the land that well. It was best used for this occasion

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The last great bluff mentioned in part one of this article—that of tricking a superior force into surrendering—has been used many times. In 1812, the British force aligned with Shawnee warrior Tecumseh took Fort Detroit using about the same tactic. In fact, military history is full of tales of bluff and trickery. Here’s a few more tasty tidbits of military lore. Taking a Bridge by Charm Alone…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mongols Dbq Analysis

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Mongols sophisticated military tactics, organized ethical and religious codes, their economic contributions, and road systems are tributes to the fact that they are not barbarians. The Mongols had displayed organized military strategies to aid their conquests that can only be achieved by intelligent and well thought out planning. Planning such as surrounding their enemy and attacking their fortresses from all sides; this cornered their enemies and allowed for easy attack. The Mongolians also had tactics like placing dummies on horses to give the impression that a great crowd of ready to fight men were assembled at the battle ground. ( Doc 3)…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the article “What Candidates Need”, David Brooks discusses the foundations of the “Lincoln Standard” by dissecting one of the most influential presidents America has ever seen, Abraham Lincoln. According to David Brooks, “Lincoln had in fullness: a fundamental vision, a golden temperament, and a shrewd strategy” (Brooks, “What Candidates Need”) that aided him in political matters and are the qualities that make up the “Lincoln Standard”. The qualities observed in Abraham Lincoln and his “Lincoln Standard” are applicable to any figures recognized as an influential leader. Alexander the Great, a leader and the king of Macedonia was a profound leader, proportionate with Abraham Lincoln and his “Lincoln Standard”. Alexander in his time sought…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There were several different attacks that they would use. These included hit-and-run, wave attacks, and ambushes. The attack that was the most effective was the feigned retreat. His army would fake like the were going to retreat, or leave the battle, and then turn back around and fight the enemies. This technique caught the enemies off guard, making them think that they were leaving.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a feature of his military system, he framed an officer corps from Mongols who were prepared in military strategies. These men were then positioned with different tribes as a preparation power. The Mongol tribes represented considerable authority in the craft of attack. They utilized raging steps and sandbags to fill in canals. Besiegers drew closer stronghold dividers under the insurance of immense shields.…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Napoleon: A Political Life by Steven Englund crafts for the reader a detailed and comprehensive timeline of Napoleon Bonaparte’s origins and the events that led to rise to power through military success, political knowledge, and personal ambition. In order to accurately present this subject, Englund utilized a large amount of primary sources ranging from letters from Napoleon and others that are mentioned throughout the reading, publications from newspapers during the time, as well as many other reliable sources. Englund himself is an American Historian from California who currently lives in Paris and teaches History at the American University in Paris. It is fairly possible that this move to Paris and his occupation there served as inspiration for Napoleon: A Political Life.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Ancient Greeks invented many different types of weapons such as the ballista, body armor, and innovation of war strategy and tactics. Many of those weapons have evolved into more technologically advanced weapons that we still use today. The Ancient Greeks invented many advanced weapons for their time. Their innovations developed into our modern day weapons and military tactics. These inventions helped pave the way for the contemporary military weapons that are still being utilized today.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They’d assemble their fighting forces, but they would also set princes, women, and children on horses a distance away facing the enemy. Sometimes, they would even create figures, and set them on horses to give an appearance of a great fighting force. Then, they would send prisoners from other nationalities ahead to face the enemy head-on. Other columns of stronger men dispatch far off to the left, and to the right, so they are not seen by the enemy. Then they close in and surround the enemy, fighting them from all sides.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The main reason that Napoleon felt the need to continue engaging in military conquest was that he was power hungry. His power-hungry actions can be seen from a young age and are even evident when he was not actively fighting a battle. For instance, Napoleon declared himself emperor in 1804. As part of becoming emperor, he was to be crowned by the Pope in the Cathedral of Notre Dame.…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Napoleon’s army marched into Russia, aiming to capture just another country, and make it their own. Little did they expect horrible weather, and usage of a Russian strategy that used the weather to its benefit to put Napoleon, and the French at a disadvantage. The Russian army, under Tsar Alexander had a decisive strategy that would lead to the defeat of Napoleon and his armies. Napoleon lost, because of Tsar Alexander and the strategy, the Napoleonic era was changed, and this victory for the Russians, is the reason it was changed. Strategist have commented on Tsar Alexander, and his ability to defeat Napoleon in many ways.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander was truly great and changed the course of history because he was the one of the most successful military commanders of all time, united and area of over 2 million square miles, and saw what was possible and set out to achieve it. this is for commenting purposes Alexander changed the course of history because he was one of the most successful military commanders of all time. He used and unbeatable military formation, called a phalanx, which is a row of soldiers standing shoulder to shoulder. He trained and used persians in his army, even though the Persians were enemies of the Greeks at the time. He was only 18 when he won his first battle.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The battle for La Haye Sainte Napoleon was increasingly stretched – his men were fighting on both the west and east sides…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Later in 1796, he became the commander of the French military. After returning home from Egypt, Bonaparte was welcomed as a hero, he also was given command of an army that was to attack Great Britain. Another reason he was a very successful military leader was because Napoleon had conquered all of Europe with the exception of England and Portugal. In 1799, during a battle Napoleon noticed that…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Babur displayed his strengths by utilizing the sources his men had on the battlefield, which disregarded the fact they had a very small army. He did not have the strongest or largest military to control, but he used his advanced technology. During numerous battles, Babur flourished because of his military tactics. Due to the advanced technology such as guns and cannons that Babur possessed, he was able to defeat other commanding leaders.…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    With so much chaos, politicians turned to Napoleon Bonaparte, a brilliant and ambitious captain and emperor, for help and to try advance their own goals. Napoleon was a popular military hero, had very much military success, who won a series of brilliant victories against the Austrians in Italy. Napoleon decided to outwit them all and become the ruler of France. He controlled prices, encouraged new industry, and built roads and canals. He set up a system of public schools under strict government control to ensure well trained officials and military officers.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics