How Did Napoleon Bonaparte Corrupt By Power

Superior Essays
Does Power Corrupt: Napoleon Bonaparte

John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were two different people who had completely different views on humanity. John Locke believed in the good of humanity. He believed that humanity is good and can be trusted to rule themselves using democracy. This is nothing like what Thomas Hobbes believed. He believed that humans are evil and can not be trusted to rule themselves, so he believed in monarchies and social hierarchies. Hobbes thinks that man is not strong enough to be ruled by themselves but need a more powerful person. Napoleon Bonaparte was an example of a man more powerful than the rest he got into power throughout people of France likening him a lot. After that he slowly took control and keep giving himself
…show more content…
On May 18, 1804, Napoleon proclaimed himself emperor, and made Josephine empress. His coronation ceremony took place on December 2, 1804, in the Cathedral of Notre-Dame in Paris. Napoleon even paid for Pope Pius VII, who had signed the Concordat of Rome, to travel to France for the occasion, believing that his presence would imbue the event with a solemn, religious feeling. Pius agreed to come, hoping to win Napoleon's goodwill towards Rome and the Papal States. Napoleon surprised everyone by not allowing the Pope to crown him. Instead, he placed the crown on his own head, and then crowned Josephine empress. A few months later, on May 26, 1805, Napoleon crowned himself again– this time with the iron circlet that symbolizes the rule over all of Italy. This is a proof of corruption by power because he had enough power as first consul. As first consul he could make almost any decision towards the better or worse of France but decided to make himself emperor. Also during his coronation he invited Pope Pius VII to coronate him but he ended up doing it himself which is pretty rude to someone you invited to do that job but then he did it …show more content…
On April 20, 1814, Napoleon left France for the isle of Elba where he was exiled under the terms of the Treaty of Fontainebleau. Napoleon was allowed to rule Elba. It seemed as though Napoleon was content to a life of relative retirement. All the while, however, he was plotting his return to Europe. On Elba, Napoleon was under the constant watch of Austrian and French guards. Nonetheless, he was not isolated: he received thousands of letters from all over Europe and read major newspapers that kept him abreast of events throughout the world. It was probably via these sources that he learned of Josephine's death on May 29, 1814. On February 26, 1815, Napoleon managed to sneak past his guards and somehow escape from Elba, slip past interception by a British ship, and return to France. Immediately, people and troops began to rally to the returned Emperor. French police forces were sent to arrest him, but upon arriving in his presence, they kneeled before him. Triumphantly, Napoleon returned to Paris on March 20, 1815. Paris welcomed him with celebration, and Louis XVIII, the new king, fled to Belgium. Using the army that Napoleon decided next to attack the English, then at Waterloo, a village near Brussels. On June 18 1815, the British, aided by the Prussians, defeated Napoleon for the last time. Napoleon abdicated on June 22, 1815. On October 15, 1815, the British sent him to the remote

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Thomas Hobbes established his own ideas about people and politics. For example, Hobbes believed that humans were selfish and did anything to better their position. Also, he believed that nations were selfishly motivated and only battled for power and wealth…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In January 1793, King Louis was executed, but the war was still going bad for France. The period following Louis’ death was known as ‘The Terror’ in France. It spread all over the country. This was a cruel period when France was killing its people by hundreds in a frightening way of rage and decadence. The people were arrested and executed without trial if they were accused of being enemies of the revolution.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Napoleon Case Study

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited

    In 1804, he implemented Code Napoleon, officially know as the civil code of 1804. This code provided for a single legal system for France, equality before the law and careers open to talent. It also granted freedom of religion, abolished serfdom and secularized the state. However, on the less liberal side of the spectrum, workers were denied collective bargaining (Negotiation between workers and their employers to determine wages, hours, rules, and working conditions.), trade unions were outlawed and a system of labor passports was instituted. His incentive for this side of the code was probably to limit political freedom.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Enlightenment was an intellectual and philosophical movement which dominated the world of ideas. This put stress on reason and logic. This was a time where people no longer would need a king to order. This was a start for people to gain individuality. Thomas Hobbes was one of the enlightenment thinkers.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte is a perfect example of a man corrupted by power, Napoleon is so corrupted by his greed for power that he turns into an evil man, a villain. Napoleon may have been a villain but he was also incredibly smart, manipulative and conniving, he managed to convince a whole nation of his absolute patriarchy towards their country. He portrayed himself as the ultimate French men, the ultimate War General, the ultimate Ruler and the ultimate being. Napoleon did help to better France by promoting education and continuing to remove the effects of the feudal system. Napoleon was a smart man hut he allowed his ego and hunger for more power become his demise.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte was a power hungry tyrant because of the two unnecessary wars in which he ignited that ultimately led to his demise, his participation in the concordat, and because of the unreasonable Napoleonic code that was in place, to ensure Napoleon’s…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Napoleon's Paranoia

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages

    One of the many terrible events I have witness was when the hens decide not to follow Napoleon’s order and rebelled. This event was similar to the Kronstadt rebellion of 1921, which was unsuccessful. The rebellion proves Napoleon's inability to listen to his subject. Under his leadership the farm experienced a famine,like the Ukraine famine of 1933. The famine proves Napoleon's inability to care for his people and the well being of the farm.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Later in 1796, he became the commander of the French military. After returning home from Egypt, Bonaparte was welcomed as a hero, he also was given command of an army that was to attack Great Britain. Another reason he was a very successful military leader was because Napoleon had conquered all of Europe with the exception of England and Portugal. In 1799, during a battle Napoleon noticed that…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Louis Xvi Research Paper

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Napoleon also led the French to victory against the Egyptian military rulers. This helped him gain more power and fame, which made France rise again. At the age of 35, Napoleon crowned himself the emperor of France in 1804. He helped France expand. At France’ greatest extent in 1811, It controlled much of Europe: from Spain to the border of Russia (Excluding Britain).…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout Chapter 1 of Keeping the Republic, Barbour and Wright discuss the ideologies of three influential members of Politics: James Madison, John Locke, and Thomas Hobbes. Beginning with Madison, he believed strongly in having a republic. As the text describes it, a republic differs from a traditional sense of a democracy, as representation is required. (p.16-17). Madison believed that in a “True Democracy”, everyone would only be acting with their own self-interest in mind.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Locke are both social contract theorists who have influenced many citizens of this country. To begin, they both start out talking about human nature. Locke and Hobbes had very different views regarding human nature. Locke claimed human nature as reason and Hobbes claimed it as power and appetite. Locke believes that reason is the primary attribute of human nature.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Views On Rebellion

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages

    We are asked what type of situations would have to occur or under which conditions would it be deemed acceptable or ok if ever to take action into our own hands, to rebel and go against our government. What would have to happen in order to make it acceptable for us to inflict fear and the risk of civil war on our own citizens. This particular topic is still seen as very relevant even at present in the world. There have been many rebellions all around the world that are hugely important in history and in the running of those countries even today. Still to this day are rebellions occurring all over the world many for different reasons.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes believes humans are born evil, their natural instinct is to be envious, violent, and narcissistic, however, by fear and reason, they are capable of preserving peace. On the other hand, John Locke believes humans are mostly peaceful, good, and pleasant, but circumstances can cause people to be violent and war-like. Locke and Hobbes also differed in social contract theories, whereby John Locke believed that all people have rights that need to be protected by a government, yet the people should remain in power; Thomas Hobbes supported the idea that people are all bad, and because of that, an ultimate ruler needs to establish laws that man should abide by. Although these views seem very apples and oranges, there is a huge discrepancy. John Locke promoted the preservation of all human rights, and on several occasions disapproved of slavery, however, it turns out that he actually endorsed it and proposed that people should have absolute power over them.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke (1632-1704) is another modern political philosopher who also had strong views on political nature, but differed from Hobbes. One of Locke’s main hopes through his writing is to destroy the idea of monarchial theory: “it is impossible that the rulers now on earth should make any benefit, or derive any the least shadow of authority from that, which is held to be the fountain of all power, Adam 's private dominion and paternal jurisdiction; so that he that will not give just occasion to think that all government in the world is the product only of force and violence, and that men live together by no other rules but that of beasts, where the strongest carries it, and so lay a foundation for perpetual disorder and mischief, tumult, sedition and rebellion, (things that the followers of that hypothesis so loudly cry out against) must of necessity find out another rise of government, another original of political power, and another way of designing and knowing the persons that have it,…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays