Time and time again, the irrational and unprecedented conquest of nationalism has yet to serve its purpose in relinquishing and retorting its supremacist feelings over other countries. However such purposes or ideologies have not yet to be relinquished due to man’s subjectivist fallacy or relativism, man’s hypocrisy. Even though conceptions such as that of nationalism convey connotations of security, loyalty, social communications, and furthermore human interactions, they also convey and “justify conflicts and disguise injustice under the banner of patriotism” .When one or furthermore a country, over exalts one’s self or even begins actions to cause quarrel, it is typically due to one of three reasons: competition, diffidence, or glory.
…show more content…
to renounce its diffidence or insecurity. “During the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe (over exaltation of one’s self), they are in that condition which is called war…” Thomas Hobbes, an English philosopher, suggests that part of human nature is not only to act with arrogancy but to act in ways of supremacy, egotism and self-importance. Thus, when these things are challenged or attacked we resort to the low the desires of waging war, however, it may be. This could include resorting to conflicts in a physical, political, or interactional way. Furthermore, the idea of establishing one’s self in a certain environment will also lead to this form of response. Hobbes makes a legitimate point in establishing that these quarrels exist, because of “gain…safety….reputation” . Thus, nationalism is correlated with many aspects of human life, “more to human passion than …show more content…
This creates certain political demands that not only allow powerful individuals to furthermore insinuate the use of violence or intolerance, but it allows the advocacy of defense, protection, and justification of one’s nation against adversaries both internally and externally. The evolution of the vast integration of culture and its reality of existence may sometimes “threaten individual identity” , and “promote war of aggression” due to embellished nationalism and sometimes patriotism. Moreover, the belief of thwarting adversity and difference is quite correlated with nationalism in order to establish and omit any doubt when it comes to a nation’s superiority. Therefore, there are certain natural and hereditary contradictory features of being human. These features enable us to demean and degrade one group of individuals or even ideologies and theologies, and then celebrate, exalt or even dismiss another. This poor form of inductive reasoning is a comparison to that of Francis Bacon’s criticism of poor and illegitimate commute to truthful investigation. Although we live in a time in which laws and regulations are placed to curb foolish, contradictory and unfounded thoughts, that doesn’t imply that these laws render or inhibit the actions of such thoughts in any way shape or form. Thus, nationalism at times may entangle in theologies such as
to renounce its diffidence or insecurity. “During the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe (over exaltation of one’s self), they are in that condition which is called war…” Thomas Hobbes, an English philosopher, suggests that part of human nature is not only to act with arrogancy but to act in ways of supremacy, egotism and self-importance. Thus, when these things are challenged or attacked we resort to the low the desires of waging war, however, it may be. This could include resorting to conflicts in a physical, political, or interactional way. Furthermore, the idea of establishing one’s self in a certain environment will also lead to this form of response. Hobbes makes a legitimate point in establishing that these quarrels exist, because of “gain…safety….reputation” . Thus, nationalism is correlated with many aspects of human life, “more to human passion than …show more content…
This creates certain political demands that not only allow powerful individuals to furthermore insinuate the use of violence or intolerance, but it allows the advocacy of defense, protection, and justification of one’s nation against adversaries both internally and externally. The evolution of the vast integration of culture and its reality of existence may sometimes “threaten individual identity” , and “promote war of aggression” due to embellished nationalism and sometimes patriotism. Moreover, the belief of thwarting adversity and difference is quite correlated with nationalism in order to establish and omit any doubt when it comes to a nation’s superiority. Therefore, there are certain natural and hereditary contradictory features of being human. These features enable us to demean and degrade one group of individuals or even ideologies and theologies, and then celebrate, exalt or even dismiss another. This poor form of inductive reasoning is a comparison to that of Francis Bacon’s criticism of poor and illegitimate commute to truthful investigation. Although we live in a time in which laws and regulations are placed to curb foolish, contradictory and unfounded thoughts, that doesn’t imply that these laws render or inhibit the actions of such thoughts in any way shape or form. Thus, nationalism at times may entangle in theologies such as