Analysis Of Friedrich Nietzsche's Beyond Good And Evil

946 Words 4 Pages
After comprehensively examining one of the writings of well-known German philosopher, Friedrich Nietzsche, titled, “Beyond Good and Evil,” I was able to perceive several elements that characterize his work to be knowledgeable, thought-provoking, and obscure. Although difficult to decipher because of his abundance of knowledge, it became evident through his reading that he detested ideas of nationalism; relatively alike, the indication of commonwealth principles, too. Despite the fact that nationalist activities were flourishing in this era, and commonwealth doctrines were supplicating to be practiced, Nietzsche unequivocally expresses his views in a way that shines light and institutes the viewpoints of nation-states and commonwealths to be frowned upon. …show more content…
Nationalism is comprised of a strong movement to cultivate one’s country to be more independent and, while doing so, it exhibits similar features to that of a nation-state. Since a nation-state is comprised of people who share many similarities and is commanded by those we resemble and with which we share customs, it unilaterally positions new individuals into their society with little chance to express their distinctiveness. While this may seem typical to some, Nietzsche severely disagrees. One of his main assertions is that a nation-state hinders one from conveying their true identity. To Nietzsche, this concept is not well-liked by him and, in turn, it is not fair to the individual who has to abide by these orders. For that reason, Nietzsche argues for individuality as opposed to any other

Related Documents