High Stakes Testing Research Paper

Improved Essays
Eva Du
Period 1

A Brief History of High Stakes Testing and the No Child Left Behind Act

In 1965 As a part of President Lyndon B. Johnson's Great Society, a domestic program that called for the federal government’s creation of new social welfare programs, Johnson implemented the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). The main purpose of the ESEA was for the federal government to “supply aid for underprivileged children in schools in order to improve the performance of these students and elevate them to the same level that the more privileged students were achieving at the time” (Holmes 2009). The ESEA ordered the establishment of programs for schools with a high density of students from poverty-stricken families, and it also established several bilingual programs and Head Start, a preschool program for children of
…show more content…
The IASA increased efforts to analyze the scores of students in disadvantaged communities; however, it provided no real consequences for schools that were underperforming. To further enforce increased education efforts and to provide the enforcing repercussions that the IASA lacked, President George W. Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) in 2001. The act combines the goals of the ESEA and the IASA while also dealing consequences to schools that failed to meet the proposed goals. The act entails that school funding for low income districts increase in exchange for higher academic progress as recorded by annual test scores. States are to be in charge of enforcing these ideals, and for schools who fail to meet requirements, federal NCLB funds are not given. Schools who continually fail to meet standards may face drastic restructuring that includes the firing of teachers, privatization, and state takeover. NCLB also provides extra funding for specific programs to schools who meet standards consistently and aids in the creation of a plan of action for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For decades Diane Ravitch was a tremendous supporter and proponent of school reform, advocating for government and privatized educational reforms such as America 2000, No Child Left Behind (NCLB), accountability, and charter schools. The ideas of reconstructing and reorganizing the public school system seemed like it was too good to be true; and Ravitch realized that this vision was in fact just that. Through Ravitch’s experiences, she has been exposed to the truth of the reforms that took place from the 1960’s to present day and just how damaging these attempts at improving the system can really be. As a result of these findings, Diane Ravitch raises the subject of just how the American education system is progressively failing its students…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On January 8th, 2002, George W. Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) into law. This act was created out of concern that the United States’ education system was no longer globally competitive. Under NCLB, schools were required to test all students in reading and math during grades 3 through 8, and once in high school. Schools must have all students at a proficient level, or they face state intervention. This could include taking the school over, turning it into a charter school, or even shutting it down.…

    • 2174 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Reauthorization Of ESEA

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As stated on the main funding page, only 9% of public school funding comes from the federal government. This may seem low, but it actually used to be much less. As part of President Lyndon B. Johnson's "War on Poverty", the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 was passed. The goal of ESEA was to shorten the ever increasing achievement gap between students by providing equal opportunities. The main target of ESEA were students coming form lower-income areas which usual did not receive adequate funding from the local and state legislatures.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jay Mctighe Critique

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the article, Do we need an assessment overhaul? Jay McTighe discusses how assessment in the United States is deeply flawed and needs to be changed. In 2011 when McTighe wrote the article, No Child Left Behind (NCLB) was in its tenth year. NCLB is a federal statute that has required annual state testing in order to determine the success of local schools. The scores for each school are then published which was supposed to lead to heightened accountability between schools and districts and show which schools were lacking or failing to meet “adequate yearly progress”.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Handicapped Act 1986

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Under NCLB, all children will need to perform at or above grade level in math and reading. It is the schools responsibility to meet these standards and provided after school programs or tutoring if need to the children who are not meeting the requirements. Every year schools will be evaluated, if schools are not making progress after 5 years of low test scores, schools will be forced to undergo drastic changes including state takeover, changing school into a charter school, or closing the school…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ESSA Failure

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The testing requirements were cumbersome, the annual progress benchmarks were unrealistic, and the ensuing sanctions threatened school budgets across the country. Eventually, the Department of Education attempted to alleviate the situation by granting waivers to states that exempted them from certain requirements of NCLB in exchange for compliance with a set of administration goals (McGuinn 2016). However, the waiver program proved to be similarly unpopular and was widely criticized as an overreach of the federal government (Black…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    ESEA Act Of 1965

    • 3532 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Under the Johnson administration in 1965, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) was implemented in schools throughout the United States. The ESEA act was established to provide equal access to quality education to all students. “ESEA is an extensive statue that funds primary and secondary education, emphasizing high standards and accountability. As mandated in the act, funds are authorized for professional development, instructional materials, resources to support educational programs, and the promotion of parental involvement.” (www.socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu)…

    • 3532 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nclb Failure

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Through standardized testing, NCLB holds states responsible for their quality of education by requiring each state to set academic targets in public schools. Math and reading are tested every year and those scores are compared to an independent national standard, known as the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) (The New Rules). In addition, schools must also meet statewide objectives called the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), which they set themselves and need full proficiency within twelve years.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Standardized Testing Dbq

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Was the no “child left behind act” of 2002 a lawful decision of congress? Namely this act required that schools administer yearly math and language test to students in grades one through twelve (NewYorkTimes). These tests are used to observe students intelligence. Furthermore they can help the government establish the correct amount of funding a school receives. Standardized tests have a negative impact on society.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a result, some schools had to take drastic measures, such as firing the principal and the majority of the school staff, closing down the school, or lengthening the school year or day. An article, “Every Student Act fails too many students,” by the Los Angeles Times, mentions that the Every Student Succeeds Act has disadvantages as well. Although it has given state governments more power over their educational policies, it has also made it more difficult to pinpoint the schools that need improvements. The article further states that if the country wants to improve schools, the states need to get personally involved and provide an organized improvement plan (The Times Editorial Board, 2). All of the sources listed above, helped to form my opinion that the Every Student Succeeds Act needs to improve, or be replaced with a new policy entirely, so that every student is eligible for high-quality…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nclb Argument

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For a multitude of years educational reform has been a large focus of much debate. Many believe that it is time for a change in the school system because if there is not one, then it will corrupt today’s youth and leave this nation in the wrong hands. At the heart of controversy is the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) and its effects on the school system. Many have come to the conclusion that No Child Left Behind needs to be eliminated, but some disagree on whether or not the NCLB’s implication of standardized testing is an accurate form of interpreting a student's learning. Many people believe that the No Child Left Behind act is damaging to the school systems.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 required each state to develop it’s own testing program in Math and English. There federal fundings are affected by the students performance on these exams and are expected to demonstrate grade level or higher performance. The NCLB was not only created to demonstrate grade level or higher performance by students but also to help out students who are in poverty. When Rose began to talk about this at he states “ One undeniable value of NCLB is that it casts a bright light on those underserved populations of students who get lost in average measures of performance”(47). In which he meant that poverty and NCLB are linked together because many students before the act were not reaching the sufficient amount of help.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also few disagree with a parent’s choice in selecting the school which they deem best to meet their child’s educational needs. Lastly few would argue with the need to focus on reading and math in the academic arena. However when implementing these procedures the NCLB left t devastating repercussions felt in the state, school districts, local schools, and ultimately in the students themselves. For example in the area of accountability in accordance with NCLB the student population was except nothing shorter than hundred percent student proficiency by 2014 otherwise they will be deemed “quote in need of improvement” which was interpreted as a failing school with falling student in the eyes of the federal government ( Beoher, 2014). This had trickle-down effect on schools which were deemed failing which was reflected upon teachers and students themselves.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The goal of the No Child Left Behind Act was to improve the education system. Studies show that actually the complete opposite happened. The Act didn’t meet its goal at all. According to standardizedtests.procon.org, “US students slipped from being ranked 18th in the world in math in 2000 to 27th in 2012, with a similar decline in science and no change in reading.”…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With educators focusing their teaching skill mainly to the test; it can negatively affect children who attending low income schools. The author states, “Critics argue that poor and minority children attending low-resource schools have had a more narrow learning experience under NCLB, with their teachers spending more time on test preparation, math and reading compared to children attending more affluent schools” (Roach). The No Child Left Behind program obliges for all public schools earning federal finance to conduct standardized test yearly to all students. For this reason low income schools focuses on preparation for the annually standardize test because of financial commitments; which causes teachers to lose focus and constricted the education…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays