Short Long Hair Wears Earring Analysis

Improved Essays
Annie: Heathcliff, short, long hair, wears earring
Bernard: Sherlock, tall, long hair, wears earring
Carolyn: Romeo, medium, short hair, wears earring
Daniel: Harry, short, long hair, doesn’t wear earring
Since we know each person can be right about only 1 thing, we need to cross out similarities. Starting with Daniel, we know he has to be right about the character not wearing earrings, because he is the only student that had a different answer for that category, and the other 3 students can’t all be right about the same thing. This means we also know the character isn’t named Harry, isn’t short, and does not have long hair. Annie said he was short and has long hair and wears an earring, and we know from Daniel’s answers that those 3 things are incorrect. So, that means Annie is correct about the name, Heathcliff. Since we now know the character isn’t short, isn’t tall, does not wear an earring, and also is named Heathcliff, we cross out those answers that are similar to other student’s responses. Bernard is incorrect about the name, the hair length, and the earring. Since he has to be right about
…show more content…
Knights always tell the truth. Al says he is innocent, so if he was the criminal he would be lying. Knights can’t lie so we know he isn’t the criminal. So since we know Al isn’t a Knight, and he isn’t lying so he can’t be a Knave, that means he is a Normal. Bob says that is true, and we know he is not a normal so he could either be lying (a Knave) or tell the truth (a Knight). Bob is saying that Al is innocent, so if he lied that means Al would be guilty, and we know Al is not guilty. So that means Bob cannot be a Knave. Clark says Bob is not a normal, which could be true, but someone has to be a Knight. If Bob was a normal, Clark would be lying which means he couldn’t be a Knight or a Knave. Since we know someone has to be a Knight, this means that Clark is a Normal, and Bob is a Knight. Bob is a guilty Knight, the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Melville’s “Paradise of Bachelors and Tartarus of Maids” Responses 2. Word choice in the first two pages that suggest corruption are those like “luxury”(1), “immortal fame”(1), “fuller cells”(2) of wine, and “glorious dinners”(2). The knights started to only care about wealth, wine and happening a good time, dismissing the needs of the poor people. Their instruments turned into “a one-handed quill”(2) to attack in court using law and the motivation of charging high fees to their clients. The knights mission has become to defend people in court as lawyers and live comfortably as a bachelor with the money they charge their clients.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The grandma, Mrs. Turpin, and Parker are all similar in the fact that they question their own faith and come to a revelation. Sara Ruth, Mary Grace, and the Misfit all share a common way in pushing the other characters to question…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Insecurity Growing up on a farm with two older brothers, I was a bit of a tomboy. From birth until age seven, my favorite toys were Tonka trucks and wooden guns. I wrestled in the mud, ate like a teenage boy, and at the age of five took scissors to my hair, chopping it into a pixie cut, so I could “be like my older brothers”. Innocently, I wore my barn clothes to school and my kindergarten picture displays my hair in a rats nest, with a large crooked smile, and bright eyes. However, that yearbook picture changed as my innocence faded away.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Stevens also clarified to Brenton Butler’s lawyer that he does not recall talking to an officer about the description of the individual who murdered his wife. The eyewitness in this case was confident on his statement but lack on being reasonable throughout the process of testifying it. This shows how Steven’s eyewitness evidence was not precise despite of how confident. In the article “Descriptive Eyewitness Testimony: The Influence of Emotionality, Racial…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Allyson Krohn Professor Scott Eng 333 02/04/2018 The Knight Vs the Pardoner The General Prologue in the Canterbury tales by Geoffrey Chaucer, there is a general introduction of the characters who are going to be competing to tell the best tale of the group. There are two characters that I would like to focus on, because they are quite the opposites; The knight and the Pardoner.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Tim O’Brien always seemed to base his stories off his own experiences in one way or another. More specifically for this essay, we will be talking about “How to Tell a True War Story” in his book “The Things They Carried”. What I am getting at here is that his work never seems to be what we originally think it is. In his story “How to Tell a True War Story”, the point of the story is not about war, it is not a war story. It is a love story; it is a ghost story.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A fundamental aspect of the American justice system is the right of every person accused of a crime, to a trial by jury. The defendant, presumed ‘innocent until proven guilty’, has the right to be judged by a group of his or her peers based on the evidence presented, the assumption being that the defendant will be judged in a fair and impartial manner. However, human beings are fallible and can be subject to faulty reasoning, alongside irrational and biased thinking. The play Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose is set in a mid twentieth century American jury room. Twelve strangers, all male, are brought together to deliberate the facts of a seemingly straightforward case, a young man accused of murdering his father; their decision, which must be unanimous, will either take, or save a young mans life.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men is a compelling and profound film produced in 1957 directed by Sidney Lumet. This film set in a single room with just twelve cast member, these twelve play a jury called together to judge a murder case involving a young boy who is accused of murdering his father. The jury is charged with coming to a unanimous decision because the punishment is death penalty. Throughout the movie the cast is never referred to by name, rather by their jury numbers offering the viewer an air of mystery and intrigue. The film further shows its artistic talent by offering not only a story to challenge the mind but also the audience’s ethical beliefs.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his play Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose brings us back in time to 1957, to a jury room of a New York Court of Law where one man, Juror #8, confronts the rest of the jury to look at a homicide case without prejudice, and ultimately convinces Juror #2, a very soft-spoken man who at first had little say in the deliberation. Throughout the play, several jurors give convincing arguments that make one think about whether the boy is “guilty” or “not guilty.” Ultimately, one is convinced by ethos, logos, and pathos. We can see ethos, logos, and pathos having an effect on Juror #2 as he begins as a humble man and changes into someone brave at the end. Although all three modes play a part in convincing Juror #2, pathos is the most influential because…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sir Gawain and the Green Knight along with The Wife of Bath’s Tale represent the acts of courtly love and chivalry through the actions of the female characters which can be compared throughout the text. In both stories the main male character fate is determined by the female characters which shows that both stories heavily rely on the power of the woman. This is showed in The Wife of Bath’s Tale when the knight commits the crime of rape and is being trailed in front of King Arthur’s Court and the queen and her ladies are allowed to interfere and judge the knight. Allowing him to live on the condition that he comes back in one year with the answer to the question “what do all women want most in the world”?…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The jury was attacking him because they believed that it was impossible for the knife (murder weapon used to kill the boys’ father) to fall out of the boys’ pocket; and the same knife shows up and is used to kill his father. Juror eight proved that the boy could be telling the truth. For instance, the jurors told juror eight that the knife was very unusual and that they have never seen one like it. Juror eight then uses proof to back his argument by pulling out the same knife; he then says, “I went walking for a couple of hours last night. I walked through the boys’ neighborhood.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guilty or not guilty is a life threatening question for an eighteen-year-old boy in the film 12 Angry Men who has been tried for a first-degree murder. The eighteen-year-old boy has been accused of stabbing his own father and the case has been left in the hands of a twelve-man jury in which a guilty verdict mean the automatic death of the boy. Throughout the film, we are able to recognize various communication skills that the twelve individuals display. Leadership There are two types of leaders shown in this film. Since the beginning of the film juror number eight demonstrated to be an emergent leader by not being a follower even though he was the only one who pleaded not guilty and was willing to stand alone against the rest of the jury who pleaded guilty.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Peer Pressure: Peer pressure effects on individual decision making. Therefore, it influenced the jurors to think for themselves. For example, juror number two was easily swayed by opinions of others. He had no confidence in himself and his own beliefs.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Catherine and Claire’s Rights The play Proof by David Auburn tells a story about a woman named Catherine, whose father is a brilliant mathematician plagued by a mental illness. Due to her father having this mental illness, she struggles to deal with her suspicion that she has inherited the same disease. Catherine’s sister Claire does not think she is capable of living on her own and wants to commit her to a mental hospital.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Week 2 Application Assignment: Group Dynamics and Group Stages In 1965, Bruce Tuckman developed one of the most influential models of “the developmental stages in a small group” (Bonebright, 2010, p. 111). It is a four stage model in which each stage needed to be completed in order to reach optimum group functioning. These stages were dubbed “forming”, “storming”, “norming”, “performing”. Later in 1977, he and Mary Ann Conover Jensen added “adjourning” as a fifth stage in his model (Bonebright, 2010).…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays