Globalization has been the major dimension of change in American education. American education has reflected public concern about the nation 's role in the world.
Back-to-Basics was represented by the conservative ethos in Reagan’s election. It called for an end to liberal policies associated with the 1960s.
New signs of human capital’s importance appeared in the 1980s when economic returns to education began to increase. It was grounded in the postwar period’s changing occupational structure and the rising of educational requirements for many jobs.
A Nation at risk was a statement that noted problems of declining achievement in American schools. It called for substantial reform while focusing on higher standards of performance. …show more content…
He demanded that assessments focus on achievement differences between various groups of students, such as those who were excluded from schools or treated unfairly. The universal assessment in combination with identifying learning gaps made NCLB the most ambitious educational reform measure in American history.
Through the 1960s, there was a change in the basic occupational structure of American labor force, which gradual shifted greater numbers to the service sector. Years after, factory jobs began to plummet. By 1990, the labor force’s share in manufacturing fell 18%. Economist say the drop was from technological change and the loss of jobs to other countries. This left the number of jobs requiring little education to decrease while making education gain more importance.
At the end of the 20th century few observers bothered to discuss the high school as a place to bring students from different backgrounds together. The common school ideal by Horace Mann was rarely invoked in the era of higher standards and economic predominance.
The standards movement was attempts by state governments to structure curricula more comprehensively and evaluate academic performance. The basic idea was that school subjects have to be aligned with systems of assessment to see how well schools were fulfilling their instructional …show more content…
Soon, schools and teachers were judged based on their students’ performance on the exams. In some cases the emphasis on testing was taken to extremes. For example, students in Chicago were expected to achieve a certain score on the ITBS before going to the next grade level. The ITBS was not designed to assess how much children had learned from a certain curriculum. Instead, it compared their overall achievement with a national sample of students in the same grade. Today, standardized tests do not delay students from going to the next grade level. Instead, students are required to take an extra class in the subject that they received a low score in.
Assessments policies like those in Chicago became known as high stakes testing, which was a controversial feature of American schooling.
The use of digital technology brought hopes in improving achievement and closing the gap between affluent and poor students. Billions were spent in requiring schools and updating computers. The advanced technology developed new ways for teachers to help their students succeed in the classroom.
Many politicians have raised the call for greater local control in educational policy decisions due to opposition to propose curricular reforms, especially for the Common Core movement, which creates national standards in certain