Global Climate Change Misunderstood

Decent Essays
Why do you think global climate change has become such a misunderstood concept in the U.S., and so politically charged (as compared to other countries)?
I believe climate change is so misunderstood because of how the message and facts are spread in our country. You will hear from two different sides that either global warming is something we need to be extremely concerned about or that it is a myth and quite frankly doesn’t exist. We have the media to blame for this. The media, like for most stories, will skew it in order for them to sell stories. Because od this we as Americans really don’t know what to believe. And on top of that we have scientists who are fabricating scientific evidence for money. Corruption and lies make it impossible to know what the truth is. As far as politics goes, it is basically the same reason. Politicians in different parties will say what they feel their supporters feel in order to gain and maintain votes. Poltiticans will involve themselves in any area of life if it means more support.
Explain parallels between the global climate change "debate" and at least 1 other complicated science concept/issue in the past, and how scientists have been perceived to "change their minds" on an issue
…show more content…
From the time I was born till about middle school everyone was taught the planets including pluto. But over time scientists discovered that pluto doesn’t clear its neighborhood in orbit it will no longer be considered a planet. This is a little different from global warming because scientists from both sides are still going back and forth while pluto being a planet was eventually decided by all parties because it was decided by scientific fact it wasn’t. However global warming has many signs of occuring but many argue that it doesn’t have full scientific

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    After reading and discussing “Learning to Die in the Anthropocene” I was left class thinking about it a lot. I really enjoyed the reading, but sort of left with the feeling that it was useless. While it clearly did not offer any practical solutions for climate change, I believe it offered an insight that can be incredibly powerful. Science can tell us climate change is a problem and that x, y, and z will happen if we do not stop doing what we are doing. For the most part, we know this.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    If we want it to be true, it can be true. The collateral damage of the information explosion is the unrelenting attack on expertise and scientific fact. Science is not above reproach or immutable. But its limits are well established enough. We perpetuate science-denialism by giving it uncritical and often equal coverage in the false guise of fairness.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even with this happening, many still refuse to accept climate change. Both sides offer facts and attempt to persuade others, but all dispute aside, climate change is a pressing problem in the world. Climate change can be easily seen if one simply looks at the environmental changes happening around them. There are multiple things happening in the world that have not in…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Oreskes and Conway take us back through the history and the science in order to understand the underlying issue. The authors also provide evidence of scientist like Ben Santer being attacked to fully comprehend the implications biased public debate has. The media is supposed to impose reliability on the government and balance decisions. Yet, when propaganda and diversion tactics are used, public decision becomes a hinderance rather than a tool. It is vital to recognize what is going on in our government and the media to change the outcome for the…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis of “Making Climate Change Understandable” Often times climate change is dismissed, however, climate change is happening and needs to be addressed. In the article “Making Climate Change Understandable” the authors DiMento and Doughman argue that climate change is a major issue in our world that needs to be made understandable for the public. They argue by showing how some people see the lack of understanding between scientists themselves, as well as, not only do scientists present us complex data but word it in a way that may make it difficult to understand for many.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An analysis of “Introduction: Making Climate Change Understandable” Joseph F. C. DiMento and Pamela Doughman discuss several points about global climate change issue in this book introduction titled Making Climate Change Understandable. In this article, the authors claim that people have been inadvertently causing global climate change, which has become a major controversial topic influencing people in different aspects. Although some people start to take actions, many citizens still do not comprehend the significance of this issue. The writers don't explore each aspect of his main claim thoroughly but choose to break down the whole big picture into several parts and emphasize one of the aspects, which is the lack of citizen’s proper knowledge to the global climate change problem. To support this subclaim, the writers provide four reasons based on several evidences and also warrants to the reasons.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Americans voted Donald Trump into office, they expected change however in terms of his environmental policy, the only thing that’s going to be changing is the climate. Trump has made it clear that he denies the existence climate change stating on twitter that, “The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.” This claim has received criticism from scientists across the globe who are stating that climate change is not a belief but an observation. American astrophysicist, author, and science communicator Neil DeGrasse Tyson is known for his outspokenness on such issues in which he often says that science is not political. “When politicians start analyzing the science,…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Imagine a barren wasteland, incapable of supporting the growth of any form of life and overpopulated with more people than it could sustain: this is the future of the earth. But, this is not just another scene from a sci-fi film of a population that has expedited their vital resources, but the reality for the “over 7 billion people” who populate the home we call earth (Hardaway 4). A considerable amount of blame is placed on global warming which is an “increase in the temperature of the lower atmosphere“; however, global warming has not garnered enough acceptance from some political officials and skeptics due to the term’s ambiguity (“global warming”). Global warming is often confused with climate change and although these terms sound alike…

    • 1270 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the March 2015 issue of National Geographic, an article by Joel Achenbach entitled “The Age of Disbelief”, discusses the rise of climate change skepticism, explore the increasing polarization between cynics and advocates, and examines the what is causing reasonable people to distrust reasons. Achenbach, who is a staff writer for left leaning Washington Post and a monthly contributor for National Geographic, points out that the concept of climate change is born out of scientific methods which bear truths that are less than self-evident and can be hard to swallow. These are the same methods that Galileo use to proclaim that earth orbits around the sun and where Darwin proposed that we all evolved from a single celled organism, both of which vehemently opposed…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to other scientists, it isn’t. So who do we believe? As reported by NASA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, there is extremely substantial evidence that points to and proves that global warming is a very prominent and real issue. The most notable evidences are rising sea levels, overall increase in the average global temperature, extreme weather events, and ocean acidification, just to name a few.…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Whether we like it or not, much of the information if not all of the information that we possess and access in our everyday lives comes from the media. We use it to fill our brains with knowledge and use common sense to figure out whether the information presented is valid and contemporary. Among information that we are exposed to, a large chunk of it happens to be scientific. An example that many are familiar with is global climate change. After reading these two pieces of writing, Climate Change as News: Challenges in Communicating Environmental Science, by Andrew C. Revkin, and The Missing Climate Change Narrative, by Michael Segal I’ve observed how they each explain the role of the media and how it plays a part in the general public's comprehension…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, some politicians, government officials, and scientists have argued against this theory. Some argue that there is no consensus, however 97% of climate experts agree humans are causing global warming. (Cook, 2016) They have gone on to say that global warming is not a real thing and that it is just a way for governments to influence people to agree with policies so that they can have an excuse for raising taxes. Other scientists who oppose this theory have said that global warming is natural and has happened since the Ice Age.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Global Warming Myth

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Global Warming, a Reality or a Myth There is a growing concern on the conditions of the Arctic when factoring Global Warming. Most scientists believe the last 50 years of constant temperature changes in the world is due to human activity and the burning of fossil fuels. Many also take in the natural factors, for example, variations in the solar radiation, where major volcanic interactions and eruptions between the ocean and the atmosphere. Many people on earth do not understand the importance of the Arctic and what major roles it plays in our very existence (Global Warming).…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Consequences of Global Warming: Are They Really Dangerous? When the subject of global warming approaches up in discussion many publics both groan and evade dialog, or put on their fighting belts and arrange for an intense argument. Some people experience embarrassed and apprehensive; some only do not pay attention. Different points of view allow different opinions on the topic. Coming from expert and environmental points of view, scientists discusses the severity of global warming, some of the threads of assumed that be in conflict with his own, and some of the consequences of constant neglect of the environment.…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One reason for denial, Keith B. Miller says, is that the scientific concession on climate change “is often rejected because of a perception that the majority is driven by social, political, or religious motives” (220). Because the social world is driven by these factors many believe that the scientific world is as well. While scientists are human and are not immune to ulterior motives, the intense verification process that studies go through insure accurate unbiased…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays