George Santayana And Critical Realism

Improved Essays
George Santayana (1863-1952) [Madrid, Harvard, Rome]. A poet and essayist as well as a philosopher, George is an outstanding representative of Critical Realism, a form of naturalism. The objects of knowledge occupy either of two statuses; they may be existing substances or subsisting essences, though it is impossible to prove the independent existence of either type of object. Santayana stated that we believe in the objectivity of substance on the basis of animal faith. The ultimate substance of the real world is matter in motion. He also asserted that the operation of the universe is mechanical and is unaffected by mind, the function of which is purely contemplative. The fundamental character of the universe is neither moral nor rational. Santayana continued that mind itself is a product …show more content…
He acquired an early reputation with three volumes on The Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages (1895). His Theory of Good and Evil (1907) embodied the substance of his lectures at Oxford University. His theory was a form of “ideal utalitarianism,” combining the thought that ethics must be teleological with the rejection of the assumption that pleasure is the end. It was his conviction that good actions must tend to produce for all mankind an ideal good which includes pleasure and something more than pleasure. Rashdall emphasised also the necessity of applying ethical theory to practical life. He participated in the development of the philosophy of personal idealism. In addition, he published a volume of university sermons and wrote in defence of Anglican clergymen who did not assent to literal interpretation of every article in the creed. His Idea of Atonement in Christian Theology (Bampton Lectures, 1919) gave him a place in theology as well as in history and philosophy. The justification of man Rashdall interpreted as the end-kindling in him of the love of god, which expresses itself in regeneration of

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Spinoza was a post-Cartesian philosopher whose major work, “Ethics,” has been very highly regarded. He has been viewed as one of the most significant Rationalists alongside Descartes and Leibniz. In “Ethics,” Spinoza unfolds a monistic view of ethics, talking about God and Nature. His main argument is that a personified infinite being is not the transcendent creator of the universe, but it is Nature that determines and governs the system of our existence, hence, nature necessarily means God. Owing to the fact that Spinoza stands against the traditional conception of God, he is regarded as an atheist.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are different approaches between Bonhoeffer and Weil's interpretation of Christianity, suffering and evil. Based on Bonhoeffer approach the only way to understand evil is through the fall of mankind light. He also notes that man cannot be the respective final arbitrator of the evil and the good with only God capable to arbitrating. In reference to Christianity, Bonhoeffer noted that there are different Christian Ethics that define the mankind ways of praising God. To Bonhoeffer, a Christian is concerned about the will of God than establishing set of given rules that they should instead follow.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Euthanasia, Free Will, and Compassion Tenzin Gyatso, the fourteenth Dalai Lama and the leader of the Central Tibetan Administration, in his book The Universe is a Single Atom (2005), tried to reconcile religion with science. He claims that religion and science are parts of the same path to ultimate truth. According to him, we must make an attempt to build a bridge and fill the gap between our different ways of thinking. Dalai Lama emphasizes that there are various potential benefits in the field of science, but its potential costs involves a greater sense of moral responsibility when there is higher level knowledge and power (Dalai Lama 132). The prominent neoconservative thinker, Francis Fukuyama, presupposes that the demand for equality…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Ferguson riots of 2014 were a seminal moment in modern America life not only as a social phenomenon but with regards to its impact on American culture. The images that it already conjures up in the popular imagination are already vividly iconic and indicative of the times, serving as a cultural milestone in the national history. The name of this small suburb of St Louis, “Ferguson”, serves as shorthand for the civil unrest that embodied the current social struggles of the entire nation, touching upon a series of festering issues that had been previously masked under the veil of imperial prosperity, the arrogant assumption of a post-racial society. The culmination of the deep rooted flaws in social architecture that could allow public challenges to the rule of law cannot be boiled down to a singular incident.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    George Santayana

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages

    George Santayana, said “those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This statement has great meaning for those who are seeking to live a life of Christ. Knowing our history and what previous generations with through, should motivate us to not fall into the same sinful traps. It is reflecting on the three backgrounds, the Jewish, the Greek, and the Roman that reminds us of the disobedience of the children of God, but it also show us the mercy of God. Galatians 4:3-5 (KJV) says “Even so we, when we were children, were in bondage under the elements of the world:…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to Nietzsche, The first essay in his book “Genealogy of Morality’’ that there are two kinds of morals that is master morality and the slave morality. For master morality, good is the powerful beautiful, and glorious while bad is the weak and the ugly. Slave morality on the other hand call the masters evil for having no reservations on how they use their power over the weak. This therefore makes the compassionate and the respectful weak good. What Nietzsche seeks to establish is that the difference between the good and bad and the good and evil is a querry of where the assessment originates.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Therefore, Berkeley refutes Descartes’ and Locke’s dualism. Berkeley aims to defeat the issues of skepticism and Atheism, for he believes that neither Locke nor Descartes properly captured the essence of God. Consequently,…

    • 2059 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    text Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals and Mill’s Utilitarianism we see both differences and similarities in Mill’s enlarged sense of justice and Kant’s kingdom of ends. To begin with, Kant’s approach to determining what is moral and what is not and some background on his philosophy is…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Descartes the natural world is based on the existence of a benevolent God; Descartes’ argument discusses the natural world by using doubt, which then hones into the works of mind and body dualism. In comparison to Descartes view of the natural world, Spinoza’s work is solely based upon one ‘Universal Substance’ which is otherwise known as ‘Nature’ or ‘God’. This substance is also regarded to hold all attributes and essences in the whole world, thus making it infinite. I argue that both philosophers share certain similarities in which their arguments on the natural world corresponds to their accounted beliefs in God having all “perfections”. Although, through viewing both Descartes and Spinoza’s philosophy I feel Locke would debate in responding that both philosophers lack ’experiences’ to prove their works on the natural world and God; especially Spinoza’s debate.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction The argument whether or not the mind and the body are distinct substances raises a still on-going debate. In this essay, I proceed to give evidence as to why the Cartesian dualism theory is flawed. First, I am going to introduce a few of Descartes’ arguments and his position on the matter. Then, I will try to pick his most appealing argument and put it up against logical reasoning and other philosophers’ viewpoints. Finally, I am going to conclude how Rene Descartes proposes fallacious arguments which object his mind-body problem.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    George Berkeley argues that an objective reality does not exist. He argues for idealism, the belief that the external world does not exist and only the mind and ideas do, by arguing against materialism, that an objective reality does exist. Berkeley believes that an objective reality does not exist because of issues that come with materialism. However, his points do not make much sense as he relies on faulty ideas. He presents his argument by mentioning how materialism is unverifiable; that we cannot verify there is an objective reality, pointless; there is no need to posit an external world, and incoherent; our senses cannot be external objects.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In their writings, Descartes and Berkeley argue the nature of sensible objects. Sensible objects are what are perceivable to the mind. The nature of how these objects are perceived and if, what the mind perceives exists is the foundation of both Descartes and Berkeley’s arguments. Are sensible objects distinctly external matter that are perceived by the mind, or are they created within the distinct mind and perceived directly. The arguments are related to Descartes and Berkeley’s different stances on rationalism and empiricism, or if our minds identify knowledge of sensible objects through experience or innate knowledge.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers John Locke and George Berkeley agreed that knowledge is derived from experience. However, while Locke argued that knowledge is also acquired through our senses, such as, primary qualities, the perception, and secondary qualities, the object perceived, Berkeley argued that our minds and ideas are the sole essence of most knowledge, except knowledge of self and knowledge of God. As a subjective idealist, he believed that physical objects only exist as they are perceived. More specifically, there are no primary or secondary properties of objects in themselves, and also, matter cannot be discovered through sensory perception. Both philosophers claimed that knowledge comes through experience, but Berkeley argues that material objects cannot exist if not experienced.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There is no Spoon The debate between idealism and materialism is an interesting aspect of philosophy and this debate has been visualised in many movies such as The Wachowski Brothers’ The Matrix (1999). The movie questions reality and an argument that can be identified from the movie is that the mind is the only thing that exists; the body and all things material, are illusions of the mind and therefore their existence can be questioned.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bertrand Russell had posed the question whether or not physical matter actually exist. He elaborated this point through argumentations and questions seen in his ‘Problems of Philosophy’ specified in the ‘Appearance and Reality’ and the ‘Existence of Matter’ – where he (Russell) claimed that the notion of existence lies in the essence of our sense data (sense-datum), with matter seen as non-existent. Throughout this essay, focus will be laid on Russell’s doubt and scepticism regarding real objects, where he described it as an irrational conception. With this in mind, attention must be put forth on the explanatory reasons used by Russell in the justification of his claim, and the account of whether or not he effectively answers the problem of scepticism in the external world.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays