Bertrand Russell And The Existence Of Matter

Improved Essays
Bertrand Russell had posed the question whether or not physical matter actually exist. He elaborated this point through argumentations and questions seen in his ‘Problems of Philosophy’ specified in the ‘Appearance and Reality’ and the ‘Existence of Matter’ – where he (Russell) claimed that the notion of existence lies in the essence of our sense data (sense-datum), with matter seen as non-existent. Throughout this essay, focus will be laid on Russell’s doubt and scepticism regarding real objects, where he described it as an irrational conception. With this in mind, attention must be put forth on the explanatory reasons used by Russell in the justification of his claim, and the account of whether or not he effectively answers the problem of scepticism in the external world. …show more content…
Russell’s objective is to distinguish whether the physical exists in reality or is just an essence of our imagination when dreaming. This is where the example of the table comes into the picture. According to Russell, it explains that we have beliefs that an observed table has some sort of nature where its existence is permanent and independant to our perception, where if we look away from it, its existence will still be there in the external world or simply just as an object in a dream (non-existent), which forwards the same notion to reality and other beings where the “whole outer world is a dream” (Russell, 1912, p. 6) Here Russell begins to doubt the existence of real-objects (the desk) but not the values of our sense data which primarily brings about the thought of the table. Real-objects are seen from within the sense data which is caused by the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Epiphenomenalism Analysis

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Critical Analysis ‘Epihenomenalism and Eliminativism’ Trenton Merricks In this paper, I will be presenting a critical analysis of Trenton Merricks’s ‘Epiphenomenalism and Eliminativism’ (2001). Merricks delivers a strong argument for the elimination of non-living macro-physical objects, and the denial of causal powers that these types of objects may be said to have: he labels this argument the ‘overdetermination argument’, which he illustrates with an example of a baseball shattering a window. I wish to object to the elimination of non-living macro-physical objects by accounting for the plausibility of macro-causation. I intend to provide objections and responses to premises 1-3 of Merricks’s argument.…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Reality? We are all unique. We all have our own way of thinking, seeing things and interpreting them. Not one person sees things the same way you do.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clifford and James are two philosophers who have contradicting opinions on whether having sufficient evidence is always necessary to believe in something. Where Clifford believes you cannot believe in anything without sufficient evidence, James believes that if the evidence doesn’t point in one way or another, it is justified to believe something based on our will. I will be arguing that James’ side is indeed correct. In James’ paper, he provides concrete evidence as to why his opinion is correct.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fatima Lundy PHI 62 The Problem of Philosophy I think it’s interesting the fact that he pose the question, how do we know if the table is real? He shoots down any key observations that anyone would make right off the back. The different colors of the table were also very interesting.…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cosmological Argument

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the middle of the 17th century, thinkers in the enlightenment began to question how belief in the existence of a monotheistic God could be rationally supported. A number of arguments for and against the existence of God emerged at this time, and while the philosophical debate on the existence of God is still in session, the initial dust has settled. At this point in time, it is abundantly clear that a the cosmological argument is untenable at both a metaphysical and empirical level, and that the various versions of the cosmological argument fail to support the existence of God. There is good reason for critically examining the cosmological argument. Theists have made a claim that God exists.…

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Universe Next Door” by James Sire provides insight into the various opposing worldviews society faces today. Beginning with the Pre-Modern thoughts that believe in God’s existence, spanning to the Modern view placing matter in the center of reality, and concluding with the Postmodern thoughts which deny the existence of reality. Throughout the semester we have discussed several of these viewings of the world, noting some views appear to be more practical than others. With the use of Sire’s eight fundamental questions I would like to compare and contrast the Pre-Modern thoughts of the Christian Theistic worldview to the Modern thoughts of the Naturalistic worldview. Beginning with Sire’s first question “what is prime reality-the really…

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dualism vs Materialism The mind/body problem, the question of what is the relationship between the mind and the body, is commonly seen as a key issue in the philosophy of the mind (Sober, 2013, p. 204). The two categories of views discussed in Sober’s ‘Core Questions in Philosophy’ that attempt to resolve the mind/body problem are dualism and materialism. Dualism is the theory that the mind and the brain are two fundamentally different substances (Sober, 2013, p. 204). Conversely, materialism says that matter is the one and only fundamental substance in nature, and the notion that mental phenomena are a result of physical interactions follows (Sober, 2013, p. 204).…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ontological argument is different than the cosmological or teleological arguments as it relies on A Priori knowledge rather than A Posteriori. A Priori knowledge is knowledge that you can know prior to any experience; it is known through reason alone. This essay will explore how reliable the ontological argument is. The ontological argument is an argument for the existence of god by St Anselm (1033-1109). Anselm defined god as “that than which nothing greater can be conceived.”…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    By marking an epistemic shift from the noumenal to the phenomenal realm, Kant places knowledge solely within the realm of appearances. By doing this, Kant shares with modern phenomenologists the overarching goal of "saving the phenomena".13 Kant roots the knowledge of phenomena into a thinking about being itself.14 He marks a major shift from the previous and predominant school of transcendental realism, and opens up the phenomenological method of simply beginning to analyze what makes our experience possible. Phenomenology is drawn out of this difficult distinction between appearances and the mind-independent real and Kant takes an important step in clarifying this distinction.15 By emphasizing the epistemic value of the phenomenal realm, Kant can be seen as opening up phenomenological…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of God, a topic discussed in both William Rowe’s and Robin Collins’ papers, but for two very different reasons. The argument of good vs. evil and the existence of an omnipresent, benevolent being such as God is a topic that many find very difficult to find answers for, and will continue to plague mankind for the rest of our existence. After reading the published works of Mr. Collins and Mr. Rowe, one may find it easier to formulate their own opinion. In the publication by Mr. Collins, he addresses the topic of atheism and theism in respect to physics.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some would say that philosophy and the critical thinking that comes with it is as important to the mind and soul as food is to the body. This influence philosophy has on an individual has been argued as having various degrees by innumerable scholars. One such that makes the case for its relevance is Bertrand Russell, in his The Problems of Philosophy, most notably in “Chapter XV: The Value of Philosophy.” In his writings, Russell strongly illustrates the value philosophy holds and the importance in the study of it.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The demarcation problem between science and pseudoscience is one of the Gordian knot problems in the field of philosophy of science. Several proposals have been made in this regard. Karl Popper proposes a ‘falsification principle’ that aims to test the scientific status of a theory. Kuhn has brought forward a claim against this principle that it is only applicable to occasional revolutionary parts rather than the most part of science. However, another attempt has been made by Lakatos in which a progressive research program draws the distinction between science and pseudoscience.…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I can see a large tree, other people can also see the same large tree and we can all agree on what it looks and feels like to a similar degree. If the tree only existed in our minds, then it becomes unlikely that we would all sense the tree in very similar ways. Nevertheless, if the tree is objectively real in reality, then that would be the best explanation as to why we can perceive it in ways that are alike. Berkeley argues that there is no point to adding on more explanations than needed but it can also be argued that Berkeley is oversimplifying our perception of the world. Saying there is no need to posit an objective reality can be likened to saying that inventions such as a watch, need no maker and simply exist independently from any…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In their writings, Descartes and Berkeley argue the nature of sensible objects. Sensible objects are what are perceivable to the mind. The nature of how these objects are perceived and if, what the mind perceives exists is the foundation of both Descartes and Berkeley’s arguments. Are sensible objects distinctly external matter that are perceived by the mind, or are they created within the distinct mind and perceived directly. The arguments are related to Descartes and Berkeley’s different stances on rationalism and empiricism, or if our minds identify knowledge of sensible objects through experience or innate knowledge.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Part I: Ontological Dualism Implies Embodied Perception Merleau-Ponty is a French philosopher whom was greatly influenced by the earlier phenomenologists Martin Heidegger and Edmund Husserl (Moran & Mooney 2007). In his phenomenology Merleau-Ponty attempts to answer various questions surrounding human existence including questions concerning the constitution of a subject and inter-subjectivity. His inquiry begins by exploring the ideas of embodiment and perception. For Merleau-Ponty finding a new method of inquiry to investigate the mind/body problem would avoid the previous downfalls and shortcomings of classical philosophical approaches.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays