Analysis Of Genealogy Of Morality By Nietzsche

Superior Essays
According to Nietzsche, The first essay in his book “Genealogy of Morality’’ that there are two kinds of morals that is master morality and the slave morality. For master morality, good is the powerful beautiful, and glorious while bad is the weak and the ugly. Slave morality on the other hand call the masters evil for having no reservations on how they use their power over the weak. This therefore makes the compassionate and the respectful weak good. What Nietzsche seeks to establish is that the difference between the good and bad and the good and evil is a querry of where the assessment originates.
Nietzsche begins the session by explaining his dissatisfaction with the English psychologists who have attempted to explain the meaning of morality. The English psychologists claimed that “good” referred to unegoistic useful actions by the people who benefited from such actions. He says that to get the true meaning of good, one should look at the etymology of some of the words and phrases used to describe this concept. His approach to finding the meaning of good is that it was associated with nobility and badness with simpleness and the common man. This inspired his idea of good and bad and good and evil.
Good was initially used by the noble class to approve
…show more content…
The nobble men are rich, powerful, healthy and happy and these are the good attributes. Whatever or whoever does not possess these attributes is seen as bad. On the other hand, the lower class developed a strong resentment towards the rich and called their deeds evil and their good. The difference thus lies in the assessment begins. The noble man develops the concept of “bad” as an after though just as the slave develops the concept of “good” as an

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    1) In Nietzsche’s first treatise, he elaborates on the notions of slave and master morality. He opens his argument for these concepts by observing that his take on morality will be passed on the history of morality to provide a better insight unlike the English psychologists. (I:1) Nietzsche mentions a very powerful thought that permeates history that the strong and the winners are who writes history. In this sense, he states that it was the nobles; the ones in charge were the ones to associate themselves with the word “good”. Through linguistic analysis, Nietzsche shows how “good” was initially associated with “master” and thus “bad” was the absence of “good”.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He says that in master morality the ‘good’ arises from the noble and powerful because they are the ones who define the term and consider themselves as ‘good’. They call themselves ‘good’ because if they compare themselves with the poor and the weak they are ‘good’ and the poor are ‘bad’. They get to make such decision because they have power over the common. He points out that the word ‘good’ comes from the same root as the words powerful, masters, rich which makes them happy. The common people are associated with lying and cowardice which makes them unhappy.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his collection of essays On the Genealogy of Morality, Nietzsche distinguishes between the moral systems of good/bad and good/evil and describes their origins, as well as problems that arise with the origins of good/evil in order to analyze two different moral systems and their implications. Nietzsche first distinguishes between the two moral systems of good/bad and good/evil in order to draw a contrast. Good/bad is defined as those with power and those without power: the good, like the warrior caste, have the power while the bad, like the poor, do not have the power. This is a binary way of viewing morality where good is the exact opposite of bad. The binary of good/bad does not implicate anyone for their status but is instead based in…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Comparison of Medina and Nietzsche’s Philosophy The philosophies of Jose Medina and Friedrich Nietzsche differ in the sense that Medina focuses on the epistemic injustice while Nietzsche focuses on deconstructing morality. Medina explores injustice in society with the goal of finding factors that contribute to its existence. In essence, the philosopher believes morality to be a noble human virtue, and a factor that can be used to eliminate social injustices. However, due to social beliefs that alter the perspectives of oppressors and the oppressed, it becomes difficult to champion for morality. In the case of Friedrich Nietzsche, he argues that morality is a questionable human virtue that has no objective place in reality.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They live completely actualized lives with a sense of fullness. Nietzsche wrote that this type of “noble man, too, helps the unfortunate, but not from compassion, or almost not, but more from an urge produced by the abundance of power” (Nietzsche, p.155). Those who are weak, enslaved and unhealthy are seen as ‘bad’, because their weakness is undesirable (not useful). While the ‘weak’ referred to the ‘masters’ as ‘evil’ and called themselves by contrast…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes Vs Kant On Morality

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hobbes believed, “that whatsoever a man does against his conscience, is sin; and it dependeth on the presumption of making himself judge of good and evil.” (Hobbes, 2008, pg198) If one goes against their conscience and desires something or believes that it is the right way, it becomes solely dependent on the individual’s judgement of what they presume to be good or evil. In Hobbes view, he is considered to purse what is most desirable to be in balance with the physical matter in motion, therefore what we think is good is actually formed motions within us. Hobbes believes that anything in relation to good or evil can either be caused by the sovereign state, which everyone is abided too, or by individuals. For example, the use of drugs can bring delight but at the same it is risky making the action impossible. Ones goal is to satisfy the needs of their last desire or aversion.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nietzsche identifies two types of morality, which include master and slave morality. Master morality is the morality of the superior people while slave morality is the morality of the inferior people. According to him, Modern systems such as Christianity and utilitarianism are examples of slave or herd morality, (Stanford 2016). Master morality isn’t really morality in any traditional sense. The superior person makes his/her own rules; superior people are beyond good and evil (SS, 70).…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1886, Friedrich Nietzsche published his book Beyond Good and Evil in Germany, a work in which he implies his criticism of dogmatism while simultaneously emphasizing the need for one to adopt his own moral code. I believe he published his book not only for past philosophers, but for the middle class as well. He states, “the gregarious European man nowadays assumes an air as if he were the only kind of man allowable” (Nietzsche, 121). With this statement, I believe Nietzsche targets past philosophers and criticizes their personal psychological approaches as ones used to support their own moral biases. He does not believe that science should have a bearing on a person’s morality, but these philosophers developed their scientific methods as a way to support the basis of their personal morality, thus allowing them to classify those who opposed them as evil and immoral.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The priests claim that the nobles are free to pick their actions and are, thus, held responsible for the suffering and violence they cause. “It is within the discretion of the strong to be weak.” (Nietzsche, 179). This new claim, of the priests’, not only makes the spontaneous and instinctual actions of the nobles as evil doings, but also portrays the priests’ weakness as a willed and worthy act. The weak also claim that they “prefer their suffering which they propose as an unassailable index of their goodness. The slaves could retaliate if they so desired… but they choose instead the righteous path of suffering and self-deprivation.” (Conway, 46).…

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While many philosophical teachings argue that we must view concepts with indifference and objectivity, Nietzsche says that philosophers still tend to fall under the influence of their own prejudice and instincts. Therefore, the argument that truths are far more valuable compared to falsehood is invalid. Falsehoods (prejudice and instincts) determine what people believe to be truths. Nietzsche bring up past philosophers such as Kant and Spinoza as examples of philosophers that have guised their prejudice as definite truths. This reflects Nietzsche belief that all philosophies are based upon the individual philosophers own life, in his own words, he believes that philosophies are the “confessions of its…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays