George Marshall's Article: Understanding Faulty Thinking Tackle Climate Change

Improved Essays
In the article “Understanding Faulty thinking tackle climate change” author George Marshall explains the psychological reasons why we ignore climate change. The article presents many biases we employ which affect how important we deem an issue and prejudices on why we choose to ignore it. After throughly analyzing the article based on its content and use off logos, ethos, and pathos I have concluded that every UTA alumni would be able to make their own connection with any of the statements provide in the article. Thus I would happily recommend the article be published in UTA’s newspaper The Shorthorn. George selectively includes some logos in an effort to persuade and appeal to his readers. He mentions that the latest report from the intergovernmental panel on climate change uses the word “uncertain” more than once per page. Thus indicating that even our governments are iffy on acknowledging climate change …show more content…
Kahneman’s loss aversion bias states that people are more sensitive to looses than to gains however it seems to not apply to climate change since it seems as a distant problem. Kahneman’s assimilation bias which states that we bend information to fit our existing values is also used by George to explain that people don’t see climate change as an important issue because they value other issues. George also cites information from Stanley Cohen a sociologist at the London School of economics and Janis Dickinson a neuroscientist from Cornell University, whom stated that images representing death and suffering are powerful triggers for the denial of mortality. George’s credibility can be proven even further due to the fact that he is the author of the book “Don't even think about it,: why our brains are wired to ignore Climate Change” and he is also the founder of the climate outreach information network in Oxford

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    When the phrase “an inconvenient truth” is stated, the immediate expectation is that one will soon hear something that will go against their beliefs and norms. They fear they will have to stop the behavior they normally carry out and revise their current course of action to accommodate this new “inconvenient truth”. The creator of “An Inconvenient Truth”, Al Gore, utilizes this fear to spread his belief of global warming and its effects on our world. Initially, Al Gore wanted to become the President of the United States, a platform he planned to use as a way to warn the public about global warming. His attempts at presidency failed, but he did succeed as Bill Clinton’s running mate in the presidential elections of 1992 and again in 1996.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Brain Fagan presented this material in a simple and rigid way that clearly portrays his argument that climate change has a big control over human…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He states that he believes the issue of climate change is less of the utter catastrophe that most news outlets seem to make it out to be, and that it will moreso be a problem humanity will adapt to with little struggle. He begins by noting how the IPCC apparently believes that global warming will only serve a minor inconvenience, and how people will simply need to mitigate and adapt in order to survive. The paper then moves to describe various apocalyptic predictions dating back to the beginnings of civilization to the present. These are compared to the…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Climate Change: Fault in Humanity Bill Mckibben’s essay makes several claims relating to the ongoing climate changes happening. Mckibben emphasizes that society is not doing enough to help stunt the negative change in climate. He targets the educated social class who have an ability to make a change and those who call out others for hypocrisy. Mckibben assembles several claims that hold truth in them using anecdotal and common sense evidences, but lacks to use sufficient numbers, statistics, and documented evidences.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature” Pp. 1-6 This article features a study that attempts to quantify human effect on global warming and how much we are truly causing. The paper also talks about the need for awareness of global warming to increase worldwide in order for global climate reform efforts to be made. The paper talks about how many false reports on climate change are published, and that knowing the difference between a legitimate and a fake study is important. In the end the paper supports campaigns that contribute to shrinking the consensus gap to help find a general understanding among legitimate scientists.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fox News establishes their credibility by referencing to experts’ opinions, like climate scientists. For example, Doug McKelway, a Fox correspondent on The Special Report, uses the “NASA scientist turned climate activist James Hanson,” to show he “also acknowledges the lull” in the planet’s temperature rising (“Climate Change Challenged”). By using this prominent and credible climatologist, Fox News gains the public’s trust and faith in their climate change opinions. James Hanson proves that Global Warming was exaggerated, once he identifies that temperatures have flat lined and have only increased a few tenths of a degree in the past decade. Dr. Robert Carter, a marine geologist, agrees with Hanson and believes that this lull in the past decade proves that climate change is natural and not caused by humans (“House Environmental Committee”).…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Living In Denial Themes

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Living in denial by Kari Mari Norgaard was a very intriguing book concerning the emotions concerning climate change. I conducted four interviews trying to learn about their emotions and concerns toward to environment. My finding are all very different and interesting in the fact that they are so much like the book and so different at the same time. I categorized my finding by eight themes: fear, helplessness, guilt, not knowing, not caring, surface acting, all is well, and political alienation.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cool Dudes

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages

    McCright and Riley E. Dunlap’s essay, “Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States,” they state that “conservative white males are more likely than other adults in the US to express climate change denial views” (McCright et al., 1171). McCright and Dunlap also discuss two main reasons, identity-protective cognition and system-justification tendencies, which lead to conservative white males’ denial views. Identity-protective cognition means that since conservative white males are likely to perceive conservative white male elites to be their in-group, they are eager to embrace and defend the denial claims of those conservative white male elites (McCright et al., 1164). The system-justification tendencies mean that conservative white males display the tendency to justify and defend the current social and economic system, because they have largely occupied positions of power with the current economic system (McCright et al., 1165). They are not willing to accept climate change, because it interferes with their fortunes by posing expensive challenges (McCright et al., 1171).…

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Love Your Mother (Earth) The world is changing in a deadly way and if we do not act now, it may be too late to save it. Global climate change is a real problem and needs to be addressed in a truthful manner, by government officials, by educators, and by the media. It is easy to see the effects human interaction has on environmental events and the climate with extreme events happening at a rate never seen before.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Public discussion is frequently a positive platform for opening discussion topics and easy worldwide access. However, in Merchants of Doubt authors Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway presents the dangers of relying on the public or popular platform. One of the major issues is the public platform is the number of people in the discussion only fuels to the argument, thus it takes longer to achieve their objectives. The other issue is the stakes and implications the debates have on policy. In general, Merchants of Doubt teaches readers it is important to understand the source of the issue versus what is being debated and to further examine the purpose behind each side.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Post [Hurricane] Sandy (which hurt the economy to the tune of $100 billion) and the drought ($150 billion), 74 percent of Americans have decided they’re very concerned about climate change and want something to happen” (McKibben 669). “A Moral Atmosphere” by Bill McKibben, argues that Americans are blaming climate change on big industries, while they could be part of the movement on climate change. McKibben goes on to show how Americans will use excuse after excuse to explain why the weakening ecosystem is not their fault, but in reality it can be solved by normal people. He concludes with that in the end everyone is going to need to step up and help fight to protect the damaged biosphere. “A Moral Atmosphere” uses strategies of statistics…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Climate Of Doubt Analysis

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Frontline’s Climate of Doubt was a compelling film showing how climate change has become more of a political issue than an environmental one. The film followed correspondent John Hockenberry around the United States as he interviewed several individuals that included scientific specialist, conservative republicans and liberal democrats who may or may not have been holding a position in office at that point in time. He asked simplistic questions surrounding the issue of climate change that could have been answered by anyone who was able to comprehend their own beliefs, however some individuals refused to answer the question directly and the pattern seen behind their response seemed to be associated with their political choices. It was clear to see that throughout the film there was a trend occurring. Republicans refuse to believe that human-made climate change is an issue and the real question is why they believe such lies.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The correct use of the term, especially by an influential figure aids in the acceptance of climate change’s presence. Research in the article "The Scientific Consensus On Climate Change As A Gateway Belief: Experimental Evidence" notes that “at least 97% of climate scientists have concluded that human-caused climate change is happening” (van der Linden et al. 1). The scientific evidence supporting climate change is paramount, yet numerous people--conservative Republicans--continue to believe that the severity of the situation does not exist. Climate change has gained controversy within the political sphere due its negative portrayal of fossil fuels an energy source which Americans have relied on for decades. This financially and politically motivated reliance has left little to no room for alternative energy sources: ethanol, geothermal, solar, and…

    • 1270 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the March 2015 issue of National Geographic, an article by Joel Achenbach entitled “The Age of Disbelief”, discusses the rise of climate change skepticism, explore the increasing polarization between cynics and advocates, and examines the what is causing reasonable people to distrust reasons. Achenbach, who is a staff writer for left leaning Washington Post and a monthly contributor for National Geographic, points out that the concept of climate change is born out of scientific methods which bear truths that are less than self-evident and can be hard to swallow. These are the same methods that Galileo use to proclaim that earth orbits around the sun and where Darwin proposed that we all evolved from a single celled organism, both of which vehemently opposed…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    steps around the narrative fray and focuses on reiterating the naked facts of climate change…”. The media is then subjected to being general and stating the same plain information about climate change that many of us will see in most climate change…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays