Analysis Of Machiavelli's Political Philosophy Of The Prince

Decent Essays
Political views have changed throughout the years with regards to how different Kings, Dictators, Pharaohs, and Princes perceived the foolproof ruler should be. Machiavelli a philosopher and politician, has depicted how he believes a prince should be in his handbook, The Prince. Stating different examples and theories he explains what a prince is entitled to follow to be the unflawed prince. Machiavelli introduces us to terms that define a prince and how they come to be imperative to a well-defined ruling, he thenceforth proceeds to show us the way rulers come into power and how to stay in that power and not lose out for simple mistakes. His handbook can even be seen as a step by step guide to becoming Prince of the decade as it pertains to …show more content…
Machiavelli’s political philosophy would be the ruling of a Princedom.
To begin Machiavelli states that a princes’ should or more than likely be hereditary, meaning “the sovereignty is derived through an
…show more content…
Many points he makes are about war and conquest over a certain piece of land. Mentioning rulers that had achieved many conquests like Alexander the Great, he conquered all of Asia and died before actually possessing his lands, but even then his newly acquired kingdoms did not revolt. Machiavelli uses this example because it shows excellent ruling during and after the conquest. Even after the death of Alexander, “Nevertheless, his successors were able to keep their hold, and found in doing so no other difficulty than arose from their own ambition and mutual jealousies” (Machiavelli 8). His arguments make sense and he uses many to make his point crystal clear. Machiavelli not only uses examples of success but of defeat. Take Italy for example, he states that they lost their states due to their own indolence, they believed other people would back them up when they did not even know that their own populace was hostile and did not secure themselves well enough. Every example that Machiavelli states correlates to his main topic, becoming The Prince. With intelligent leaders Princes’ get outstanding outcomes, but with ignorant rulers, society is bound to suffer. Following Machiavelli’s rules according to Machiavelli himself will get you far as a leader for your people. Be it that you understand the way he argues and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For hundreds of years, civilizations have depended on rulers to manage the people and prevent anarchy from erupting. While some leaders execute these actions with ease, others fail to do so and often lose their states to opposing rulers or forces. Niccoló Machiavelli, an Italian philosopher who lived from 1469 to 1527, describes in his book, The Prince, the characteristics he deems necessary in a strong ruler. Throughout the book, Machiavelli uses leaders of his time, like Cesare Borgia and King Louis XII, as examples of what a person should or should not do in order to maintain or improve his state. However, a more recent leader who exemplifies the qualities outlined by Machiavelli is King Louis XIV of France, as he was content with being…

    • 1107 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli’s Prince seeks to recruit and educate a ruler in the art of ruling. His ideal rulers are founders, men who created a fatherland and were not afraid to sacrifice lives and their self-interests for the common good. Machiavelli stresses that a ruler needs to appear virtuous while using vices when necessary to achieve positive results. Machiavelli teaches the ruler to divide his self. “It is essential, therefore, for a Prince […] to have learned how to be other than good, and to use or not use his goodness as necessity requires” (Machiavelli, 40).…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Machiavelli's Summary

    • 2626 Words
    • 11 Pages

    This quote is taken out of the part of text when the topic of what princes are blamed or praised for is discussed. It states that a man who solely looks at what should be done, most often in an ethical mindset, without the context of what the state of situation is, would not prosper as a leader and the respect the people have for him would diminish, leading to his ultimate demise. He is stating that one cannot act morally at all times if that is not what’s best at the time because those people who are not moral would act up and possibly overthrow the leadership. Machiavelli believes that leaders, in order to be strong and maintain power must serve themselves and not the people, and therefore uses this statement to illustrate that those in power must primarily accomplish what is best for themselves, and not the people in order to be “virtuous” leaders and have the respect of subjects and ultimately,…

    • 2626 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some people may say that Machiavelli’s advice that a competent leader should uphold effective military capability will help them survive in power in the modern-day world, Additionally, Machiavelli said that…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli dives into politics with a very aggressive and pure mindset suggesting kings and princes to only worry about the end result without caring for the means of achieving it. Informing the readers that they should do anything it takes to get into and stay in power, the ends justify the means ideal. Machiavelli states that “Every one sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are, and those few dare not oppose themselves to the opinion of the many, who have the majesty of the state to defend them; and in the actions of all men, and especially of princes, which it is not prudent to challenge, one judges by the result.” essentially saying even if the means are unjust the people only see and judge you by the results. However, the “few” mentioned by him will eventually lead to a breach in society.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli wrote "The Qualities of the Prince" in July 1513 in Florence, Italy, to convey his idea of the strong, active, and perfect ruler to the current ruling the Medicis. The work is remembered and responsible for bringing “Machiavellian” into wide usage as a pejorative term. The essay takes a stringent position on the proper way to govern a nation. With a straightforward logic, a relevant idea, and an expressed method, Machiavelli’s “The Qualities of the Prince” is a practical guide for current…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince is a guide on how a proper prince should rule his nation. Machiavelli demonstrates how the past rulers have either been successful or not. Even as his audience were that of monarchs, many of his teachings’ outcomes can be seen in present day. In chapter 12, Machiavelli comments on the usage of mercenary troops.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideas that Machiavelli displays are the true ideals of the era, however, the irony and satire surrounding how they are presented are not genuine: ““Any man who tries to be good all the time is bound to come to ruin among the great number who are not good. Hence a prince who wants to keep his authority must learn how not to be good, and use that knowledge, or refrain from using it, as necessity requires” (Machiavelli). Machiavelli is revealing to the reader that in order for a prince to do a good job, he must lie to his subjects in order to be successful. He continues to be ironic and poke fun at the system in play and proves that these thoughts of the prince are not genuine. The beliefs that correspond with those of the era that are presented in The Prince are a strong ruling body in order to maintain social order:“Machiavelli, in the world we have described, often holds qualities like liberality, affability, generosity, courage, sincerity, gravity, and faith, to be of no more or less political value than their opposites, except in communication”(Moore).…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates Is No Prince Socrates and Machiavelli lived in a time of political and civil disarray and chaos. Their thoughts on political philosophy and theory are a product of the times in which they lived. Through interpretations of their own political climate, Socrates and Machiavelli produced two schools of political thought that are incredibly different and contrasting. Plato’s Apology and Crito and Machiavelii’s The Prince present these two vastly disparate ideologies.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Overall, Machiavelli advocates that the betterment of the state’s popularity should be the prince’s top priority over doing the right thing. However, he emphasizes that it is crucial…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Prince, in contrast, is a tyranny and bares tension with republicanism. A tyranny is exactly what is identified as a bad counterpart in the Discourses. This distinction does strain the potential relationship between the two texts, yet this is only validated if the two texts are read in mutual exclusion and without the consideration of external historical…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An explanation that is potentially one of the more conventional validations of the relationship between Machiavelli’s The Prince and the Discourses is reading The Prince as a manual for the founder of what would eventually emerge as a republic. Once the prince has established a foundation of the state, the republic that Machiavelli advocates for in the Discourses will become achievable and desirable. The Prince was written to establish a unified state; the republic in the Discourses will maintain that stable and unified state. Academic Leo Strauss explains that Machiavelli wrote the Discourses to promote the imitation of ancient republics. Machiavelli longed for the rebirth of ancient republicanism .…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though the prince should hold a good reputation he must know how to be conniving and deceitful. Both of these traits in a prince tie into how he uses tactics of war. Machiavelli believes a ruler’s objective is to have impregnable power and substantial order in any possible way over the state he is in control of. “A Prince, first of all, should have no other object or thought in mind than war and how to wage it. He must not take up anything else to be skillful in, for war is the only art essential to those who govern.”…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He disregards the well being of the people, and instead focuses on the will of the prince. This is evident through his reasoning when providing options for rulers who had just acquired a nation in which the people have lived under liberty and freedom. Machiavelli’s first option is to simply destroy them, citing the Roman’s destruction of Capua, Carthage, and Numantia in their successful endeavor to control a free society. Machiavelli’s disregard for human life, coupled by the fact that he provides methods for ruling without seeking a means of good for the people, allows one to understand his definition of…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays