Genesis 2: 4-25: A Comparative Analysis

Across many, many years of “existence” God has been portrayed in different aspects with different holy books and perspectives. According to Genesis 1:1-2:4a, and Genesis 2:4-25, God is differentiated by his image, nature, and relationships with humans. In Genesis 1:1-2.4a, God’s image is personified as someone who is or was big enough to float around the Earth. Also, God’s imagery is not that of a human structure, but a being in spirit form. In addition, God apparently creates his own image and says this is the authentic version of himself. As for his yearn for nature, God expanded the world and created a heaven and sea. Later on he had also created many different landforms on which he called on for plants and trees to be formed. Also it is told that God, created birds that fly over the sea and horizon of the sun. In …show more content…
The reason behind this is because God seems much more demanding and descriptive towards nature. Plus, his physical features are not described, which shows the validity of his existence because there was no way to record his features in that time period. In Genesis 2:4-25 God is more commanding towards his humans, and I find this more believable because in every religion including Christianity, there are rules to abide by which are apparently created by God. On the contrary, Genesis 2:1-2:4a seems more unauthentic because God is only telling both male and female to reproduce and Cherish everything. In Genesis 2:4-25 God warns Adam about the dangers of the food and tree created by him. This part holds more truth because, there are many dangers of the world today that we are warned about. But in Genesis 1:1-2.4a, God doesn’t warn the beings of the world, as if no such danger existed. So this is why I believe Genesis 2:4-25 is much more