The concept of gambling being immoral stems from religious views from traditional Methodist views and Islamic ideas that suggest gambling allows people to attain wealth without earning it through effort or merit. Based on these beliefs, gambling should not be permitted. In spite of this reasoning, the state, as Jonathan Wolff puts it, “should be neutral between competing conceptions of the good.” Just because a group objects to an action, the liberal state can not ban it because it must remain impartial on moral opinion. Furthermore, a different view argues that gambling can be considered immoral because odds are always against gamblers thus making the contest unfair. Again, an argument to this is that gambling is a personal choice. Not all people gamble with the goal to make a profit, some do it for the experience, others are attracted to the risk, still there are others who gamble to pass the time. The point is, that the supposed moral shortcomings of the act of gambling are not near enough to justify its exclusion in a free and liberal
The concept of gambling being immoral stems from religious views from traditional Methodist views and Islamic ideas that suggest gambling allows people to attain wealth without earning it through effort or merit. Based on these beliefs, gambling should not be permitted. In spite of this reasoning, the state, as Jonathan Wolff puts it, “should be neutral between competing conceptions of the good.” Just because a group objects to an action, the liberal state can not ban it because it must remain impartial on moral opinion. Furthermore, a different view argues that gambling can be considered immoral because odds are always against gamblers thus making the contest unfair. Again, an argument to this is that gambling is a personal choice. Not all people gamble with the goal to make a profit, some do it for the experience, others are attracted to the risk, still there are others who gamble to pass the time. The point is, that the supposed moral shortcomings of the act of gambling are not near enough to justify its exclusion in a free and liberal