The Condition Of The Working Class In England, By Friedrich Engels

Improved Essays
In England, in the mid-nineteenth century, the industrial revolution gave rise to important transformations in the society. Friedrich Engels’ text extracted from The Condition of the Working Class in England, published in 1845, is the witness of this social revolution. Engels, who was one of the leading ideologists of scientific socialism, is describing the profound changes that British society has undergone since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution and already evokes the existence of a class that possesses only its working force to live: the proletariat. He will describe how the misdeeds of the Industrial Revolution, which reduced the worker to the role of the machine, resulted in the degradation of the working class. Through the case of Manchester, among other industrial cities, Engels shows how the …show more content…
The class struggle is the main concept used by Karl Marx (1818-1883) in the Manifesto of the Communist Party. It describes a situation in which the social classes, the bourgeoisie, and the proletariat, are strongly opposed, even violently, because of the exploitation of the latter by the former, which possesses capital. The growing impoverishment resulting from this exploitation fuels the struggle which is the only way for the oppressed class to emancipate itself and improve its situation. For Marx, the feeling of belonging to a class and the awareness of what separates it from other classes are the conditions that enable us to change society. The struggles that have been developed in the nineteenth century were merely the modern prolongation of the opposition between the free man and the slave or between the lord and the serf. This predominantly Marxist notion of class struggle is the starting point of the Revolution which will lead to the establishment of a classless society based on the pooling of the means of production and thus attaining his ultimate goal,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    What this means is that the capitalist mode of production may have empowered the individual because the capitalists had isolated them to produce their commodities, however the contradiction is that it resulted in chaos among the producers thus society failed to obtain any anarchy of production (299). As Engels argues, the driving force of the social anarchy of production transformed many men into proletarians and this driving force gave rise to the individual capitalist’s goal of perfection of large-scale industry (299). However it is this pursue of perfection that would render the individual labourer unnecessary in the capitalist mode of production. Thus here lies the link to the fundamental contradiction in capitalism. Furthermore, another contradiction that arises from the fundamental contradiction is that the chaos created in social structures is due to the rebellion of the mode of production on the mode of exchange. Capital becomes the driving force of production, which provides the individual with material fulfillment however the means of capital production also becomes an obstacle for an individual. This is because the continuous circulation of commodities in the cycle of the production of capital isolates the individual producer(s) (302). It is here that the issue of exploitation and alienation occurs as the products that the producer produces seems to gain value over the individual producer, hence why Engels states “the productive forces rebel against the mode of production, which they have outgrown” (302). This cycle continues in capitalism and is why it is contradictory and why Engels believes capitalism is not only contradictory but also exploitive thus making it a suppressive social…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Communist Manifesto opens to the reader by stating, “The history of all hitherto societies has been the history of class struggles”, meaning that there is a perpetual tug-of-war struggle between class status between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat (Marx, 1). Marx states that the bourgeoisie are those who set up the production as “the class of modern capitalists”, whereas the proletariat is the group that works beneath the means of production from the bourgeoisie, “having no means of production of their own” (footnote, 1). The Communist Manifesto states that she struggle between the working class and the bourgeoisie always results in a revolution and eventual “ruin of the contending classes” (1). Marx clearly states that the…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mccarthyism Vs Marxism

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Communist Manifesto Marx explained the historical class struggles that each society has come across since the beginning of time. Class resemblances are usually, the oppressor and the oppressed on opposite sides and classes with various orders of complicated arrangements (p.15). Marx’s believed that his society has not left the class antagonism from earlier times such as the Ancient Roman’s, however, enforced new classes with new conditions and struggles for the oppressed individuals, in place of the old policies (p.15). In Communist Manifesto Marx noted the two classes of his society were the bourgeoisie and proletariats (p.16). Quite simply, the bourgeoisie were the capitalists who were the enforcers and owners of the properties in…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This document highlights the struggle between the capitalist and the working class. Marx believed that society is made up of two classes the bourgeoisie, those who own the means of production, and the proletariat, the mass of workers who do not own the means of production.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There have many shifts in the world today, including shifts in economic systems. In “Theoretical”, an excerpt from Anti-Dühring, the author Frederick Engels describes the capitalist economic system. Within his description of capitalism, he defines the term historical materialism and its relations to defining social structure. In addition, Engels explains the fundamental contradiction in capitalism and the contradictions that arise from it. Furthermore, Engels explains what he envisions to be the ultimate outcome of the historical development of capitalism.…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Manifesto of the Communist Party and The Working Man’s Programme are two readings in the book The Communist Manifesto that can be compared and contrasted on their issues during that time frame. The main issue with The Manifesto of the Communist Party, written by Marx and Engel, is about class antagonism or class struggles. Class was arranged into complicated class structures during this time in the world. Examples of different class structures during the medieval times were feudal lords, vassals, guild-masters, journeymen, apprentices and serfs.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Karl Marx was a German philosopher and economist, who published the Communist Manifesto in 1848. He was an influential writer and in his writing he conveys the idea of communism and how the proletariat will ultimately gain political power. That the abolition of private property will result in a society with no classes, hence no class antagonism. Marx suggests that having the right to private property is what causes capitalism to exist in the first place. Capitalism leads to the proletariat becoming heavily dependent on the Capitalist. They have power over the working class, since they own private property, have the ability to gain more resources, capital, and money, which they use to exploit the working class. As Capitalism progresses, class antagonism increases, because the capitalist get wealthier and the people from the proletariat class are transformed into insignificant fragile commodities that are living under increasingly harsh conditions. In order for a class to maintain power and for class struggle to exist, one must have power over the other class.…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It really seems like Marx and Engels don't like the whole Bourgeoisie way. The markets continued to grow, demand with it, which meant that manufacture couldn't keep up which eventually led to the Industrial Revolution. The Bourgeois had full control over the state. Marx and Engels were not happy with the way things were, which leads me to believe that their definition of 'private property' really meant the Bourgeoisie way; basically any privately owned industries or productions. Marx and Engels state, " The Bourgeois will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital" (22). I think they are saying that if they lose all of the workers and…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The capitalist system is (obviously) the main gripe of Marx and Engels. The authors directly reject the ideas very much prevalent in capitalist systems by pointing out the cycle caused by the necessities of…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx Oppressor

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marx succinctly describes the history of society in terms of class struggle as “oppressor and oppressed. “Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman” and now the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, all which stood in constant opposition. The bourgeoisie is the “oppressor” in this case, being the social class who own the means of production and are concerned with withholding capital and wealth to ensure their economic supremacy.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A key social theory existing in modern day history is that of Marxism. Marxism refers to the political and social theory developed by Karl Marx in the 19th Century, which explores class relations in history. This theory was influenced heavily by industrialisation, as Marx was living in Britain during a time where the industry was booming and the economy was becoming dependent on it. As the industrial development had a major impact on improving life for most of the lower class, Marxists developed as a result of a want to discover more about their past. The core concern of Marxism is to look at those in society dubbed ‘the working class’ and to gain a better understanding of their role in history, and the struggle between them and the richer class. The…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx tries to examine the oppression workers were going through in Europe, especially on the unequal distribution of wealth under the capitalistic system. He proposes a way through which the proletariat class can wage a revolution against the ruling bourgeois class to win social and economic equality. Marx views history as a struggle of classes, such as master and servant and bourgeoisie and the working class (1998). He proposed that as the lower class gained power, a new class would emerge to subsume the old upper class with an emergent of the merchant class and a working class. As the working class eliminates the rest of the classes, there would be no need for class struggle without trappings of class welfare, for instance nation-states, money, and governments.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic. Given this power struggle class conflict is inherent. Marx’s critique of capitalism speculates that the proletariats…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although the leaders of the Bolshevik revolution aimed to create a communist society in the USSR based on Marxism, however due to several reasons, the society (and state) they formed was different from the one envisioned by Marx. Marxism, in essence, is Karl Marx’s political ideology whereas communism is a society (and a political system) based on that ideology. The research paper explores this thesis by a comparative analysis of Marxist doctrines and its application as carried out by Lenin and his successors in the ‘Socialist’ USSR. In the above context, central questions that would be addressed would revolve around whether the communists were able to establish a classless society in the Soviet Union? Was the formation of a communist society…

    • 2903 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1848, Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels published ‘The Communist Manifesto’ that was aimed at presenting the arguments, goals, and platform of Communism. The publication was a commissioned work that was intended to articulate the objective and platform of the Communist League, an international political party founded in 1847 in London, England. The authors point out the benefits of communism and the need for its application in the future. Besides, the manifesto was a proposal reading stabilization of the class structure in the society without conflict. The authors argue that historical developments have been impacted by the class struggles, with the rich battling with the poor and the exploitation of one class by another. They propose that with…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays