The Importance Of Freedom Of Speech In Canada

Improved Essays
Freedom of speech is the right to express one’s opinion without censorship, restraint, or legal penalty. With respect to this, the government’s power to interfere with its citizen’s speech, should have numerous limitations and restrictions to prevent tyranny of those in power (Mill, 6). Therefore, the Canadian government should not be involved in this complaint against Maclean 's magazine. The Canadian government should not intervene in this situation because the harm caused by the action of intervening is greater than inaction. Canada’s government should be preserving our freedom of speech and not violating this fundamental freedom. Mill’s opinion would support this argument because in On Liberty he states “If the arguments of the present …show more content…
Although speech is a guaranteed freedom under our Charter, there are vague limits to when this freedom can be restricted by the government. Section 1 of the Charter, commonly referred to as the reasonable limits clause states “The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society”. Unfortunately for us, this word “reasonable” is extremely vague and leaves the decision in the court’s hands as to what is considered a reasonable limit on our freedom. This unclear portion of the Charter creates an issue, because without proper legal counsel, people will be unsure if their speech is deemed reasonable under the law. This may deter any type of controversial speech which could be considered unacceptable under the law because of fear of punishment. Since the government has power to decide what type of speech is considered hate speech, they have the power to control speech altogether. The current vague restrictions on freedoms should be revised so that there are clear and defined limits under which freedoms can be restricted by the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Ron Paul once said, “We don’t have the freedom of speech to talk about the weather. We have the first amendment so we can say some very controversial things. Cheryl Churchill and Cindy Waters worked with each other at a local hospital in Illinois. Churchill made statements against Waters to a nurse interested in transferring to the obstetrics unit (CYNTHIA). Churchill was fired from her job due to her actions.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in Canada, the final court of appeal, and the last legal resort for all litigants; therefore, the Supreme Court of Canada decisions are the ultimate expression and application of Canadian law (Supreme Court of Canada tour). The landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in the R v. Keegstra case regarding the freedom of expression portrays the theoretical concepts behind the court’s ruling as it is the job of the court to deliver a fair decision to the parties involved, as well as a decision that maintains law and order in society. The R v. Keegstra ruling contains insights from the consensus theory and the labelling theory, as the decision of the court was in the interest of the public. To better understand a criminal law case and come up with a conclusion, the theory used must have a valid structure and must follow the rules of critical thinking and logic (Boyd, Cartwright and Heidt, 2015: 120). Also, the purpose of the criminal law must be understood as criminal law serves a purpose, which takes into account some theoretical aspects of the consensus theory and…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Freedom of expression deals with the thought that the people of the community should make up their own mind and express their beliefs wherever they want including in public. Regarding this issue, the perspectives by Jeremy Waldron and Catherine MacKinnon that are put forth, are both effective explanations for their contemporary take. In this essay, I will argue that MacKinnon’s’ argument is the correct position, over Waldron’s. I believe it is the more powerful argument because of her exploration of the collision between equality and law, her references to real-world examples such as sexual and racial harassment, and the acknowledgment of the oppressed voices’ being overshadowed.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The form and content of the Constitution Act (1982) and the current status of individual and collective rights in Canada today is a third important aspect of the “rights” here in Canada. Without the Constitution Act (1982) and the current status of individual and collective rights in Canada, Canada’s society would have stayed the same regarding the “rights” of the citizens. As years go by, society changes and that means that the “rights” have to change as well in order to keep up with Canada’s changing society. As the Constitution Act changed throughout the years it improved Canada’s living environment by creating the “rights” that were needed amongst the citizens of Canada at that current time. Without the Constitution Act (1982) and the current…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Canada's Rights Issues

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The domination of the issues of “rights” in Canada is a second important aspects of the “rights” here in Canada. The “rights” issues rose and became a dominate issue here in Canada because human beings by nature want equality and throughout society there are many aspects that are not equal, especially in reference to the “rights” that every human being faces on a daily basis. On a social and political level as human beings seek equality. Throughout the years as different major issues came up that were not socially or politically equal Canada developed change to address these issues. Canada also created new laws and rights to help develop these changes.…

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This section expresses the fundamental freedoms that apply to everybody in Canada and involves the freedom of expression, religious, thought, belief, peace assembly, and association. Furthermore this means that everybody has the freedom and right to express their beliefs and religion without being discriminated against for them. These freedoms can be used as defence against wrongful acts of all levels of government, because they are freedoms that cannot be violated and can be enforced by courts. No matter how much power the government has over people, they have no rights to violating this freedom that everybody is obligated to. Many different types of people from all different sorts of countries that follow different religions, cultures and beliefs migrate to Canada.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Freedom of Speech? The Merriam-Webster dictionary define freedom of speech as “the right to express facts and opinions subject only to reasonable limitations (as the power of the government to protect itself from a clear and present danger) guaranteed by the 1st and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution and similar provisions of some state constitutions”. Freedom of speech is ones right to say what you please without fear of being punished, is among one of the most treasured freedoms throughout America. The founders of the United States government tried to protect our liberty by assuring a free press, to gather and publish information without being under control or power of another, in the First Amendment to the Constitution. As we know, the Supreme Court plays an important role in the subject of free speech and expression, and we need to understand that…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The limitation of freedom of expression, which does not correlate with the Canadian concept of freedom of speech, should not be applied in this case though the statement made by Keegstra was negative to the public and the identified group. In this case, it could be agreed that the statement by Keegstra did not contribute anything positive to the society but experience makes it clear that it might be difficult to distinguish between speech that has value to social issues and speech that does not. Section 319(2) would have an effect on the public because it could prohibit defensive expressions. It could also prevent what should be lawful act because the law does not specify what is legal or not (http://ojen.ca/sites/ojen.ca/files/sites/default/files/resources/Keegstra%20English.pdf). For freedom of expression to be meaningful and guaranteed, it must be able to protect every expression even if it questions very basic notion about the society.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Legal Policy Essay The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects freedom of speech, as considered being one of the most fundamental protection of the American way of life in a democratic society. However, it is also very clear that there are certain forms of speech are prohibited. For example, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, “the most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic”; other limitations to freedom of speech include defamation, hate speech obscenity, and child pornography. Among all the situations with controversy, Constitution generally prohibits government’s regulation of speech, even when the speaker’s opinions are reprehensible to…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Under the Constitution the First Amendment states “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” The right to speak freely archived in the First Amendment is a sacred assurance, as well as an inevitable piece part of the democratic government and independence, which are key qualities in our society. “Censorship,” according to Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, “is an almost irresistible impulse when you know you are right.” That is the reason why an American citizen 's entitlement to free speech should be held as the highest excellence and any restriction of the right to speak freely should not be permitted,…

    • 2048 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First Amendment protects citizen’s rights to free speech. The First Amendment is “applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, restricts governmental interference with citizens’ free expression rights” (McCarthy, Cambron-McCabe, & Eckes, 2014, p. 93). However, students’ right to free speech in the educational setting can be limited if “the expression is likely to disrupt the educational process or collide with the rights of others” (McCarthy et al., 2014, p. 98). The Supreme Court applies the First Amendment in many cases regarding free speech. Through these various cases, the Supreme Court has established four legal principles to guide student expression rights in public educational facilities (McCarthy et al., 2014, p. 95).…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I’m tired of everyone exclaiming that they have a right to freedom of speech. She has an opinion. He has an opinion. And their only ammunition is that they have right to freedom of speech, so they continue to carry on with their foolishness. I wished that we were a communist nation that had strict laws that prevented citizens from expressing their feelings about social, political, racial and even sexual dilemmas that one may face daily.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For years, the United States has managed to maintain a balance between its institutional powers and personal rights of its citizens. The US constitution has undergone multiple amendments aimed at providing more freedom while the same time protects the national interests. Recently conducted studies revealed that the majority of Americans feel threaten by the decisions made by the federal government (DePlato, 2015). The paper evaluates institution powers and personal rights that the legislature should consider upholding, eliminating, or adding in a bid to balance between personal rights and national interests. The Most Important Institutional Power and Personal Right…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Censorship and the effect it has on social media. The world has been changing over the years and with it society has been changing as well. Now, change might not always be for a negative result but it can confuse many people; in their way of thinking and even the way of behavior. There will always be people trying to express themselves in ways other people do no understand and think it is wrong because that was the way they were thought and raise.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many countries, hate speech has had laws set against it because they believe that it leads to violence, but in the United States it is considered a form of free speech so it is allowed with no limits. As part of the Constitution, freedom of speech is sometimes used so that people are allowed to express their opinions and say as they pleased. Many Americans want to ban hate speech from being a part of the First Amendment because they believe that it causes and provokes violence against others. Others want to defend their rights as citizens and be allowed to express their opinions with each other without being afraid that they might get fined or put in jail because someone didn’t like what they said and got offended. Hate speech should be…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays