Persuasive Essay On Anti Hate Speech

Improved Essays
In many countries, hate speech has had laws set against it because they believe that it leads to violence, but in the United States it is considered a form of free speech so it is allowed with no limits. As part of the Constitution, freedom of speech is sometimes used so that people are allowed to express their opinions and say as they pleased. Many Americans want to ban hate speech from being a part of the First Amendment because they believe that it causes and provokes violence against others. Others want to defend their rights as citizens and be allowed to express their opinions with each other without being afraid that they might get fined or put in jail because someone didn’t like what they said and got offended. Hate speech should be …show more content…
87% of students that were surveyed at Yale claimed that they support hate speech being a part of the First Amendment (McGough). They state that everyone is entitled to their own opinion, whether it offends someone or not. If the government decides to make hate speech a crime, many will not agree with it and will create chaos because they will think it isn’t fair to be fined and/or arrested for something they said that could’ve been taken the wrong way. At the same time, there are many who take advantage of the situation that since they’re in America, they can say, yell, type anything they want whether or not anyone is offended by the situation. Some people may argue that hate speech should be completely banned because it creates violence and fear. Although hate speech can lead to hate crimes, it isn’t necessary to ban hate speech all at once. If it was banned, then our First Amendment would be taken away and our rights would be violated as a whole. “...government should have the authority to stop people from saying things that offend minorities.” (Richardson). According to Richardson, about 40% of millennials agree that hate speech towards the minority should be banned. …show more content…
After finding a Latino homeless man on the streets, two brothers had gone up to him and beat him up later telling the police officers that Donald Trump was correct and that illegal immigrants should be deported (Greenblatt). After Trump gives his speeches about hispanics, muslims, etc… people who tend to agree with him on the situation turn it to violence. He tends to provoke his followers into hurting the people he hates even more by claiming that they are the problem of America and that they shouldn’t be here. His words are affecting people both mentally and physically. Kids are afraid of being deported and families are afraid of being torn apart. A lot of them are afraid of losing their dreams of becoming wealthy. Just like the black man who was beaten up at one of his rallies started chanting that the lives of black people matter. Regulations on hate speech should be placed so that people like Donald Trump can’t provoke his followers into hurting someone because of their beliefs and their opinions. “The US allows people to advocate violence, murder, terrorism, and genocide – even against minorities – all in the name of ‘freedom.’” (Cohen). Since America is known for being one of the only ones in the world where their citizens are allowed to express themselves in any way, shape, or form that they want it has made it difficult to put laws against certain things. If hate speech

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Navneet Kaur English 120 Wendy Hayden November 1, 2017 Erwin Chemerinsky’s article “Hate speech is protected from free, even on college campuses” is a response to professor Robert’s C. Post on why all sorts of opinions should be expressed on college campuses, regardless of their offense and unpopularity. As students are disrespected by the thoughts of most conservative speakers, colleges have to shell out thousands of dollars for student safety and to allow speakers to deliver their ideas without any trouble. Chemerinsky, who taught law at UC Irvine, experienced this attitude when his students believed that school officials had the right to limit hate speech. As opposed to Post, Chemerinsky believes that hate speech should be addressed if…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even in other countries in Europe people are not allowed to use “hate speech” and they can be sent to prison for it. Fortunately, the American constitution defends people’s freedom of speech, no matter how controversial it is. Political correctness diminishes people’s free speech. It may not be direct but even indirectly the knowledge that someone might have adverse consequences, such as losing a job, as a result of their speech is unacceptable. People have the right to state their opinions without others infringing on them, it was the principle in which America was…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The issue over removing Confederate statues has sparked many debates and emotions throughout the U.S. Hate speech stirs emotions, so do these statues. This made me think of the debate over if hate speech is protected by the freedom of speech. Hate speech is a terrible thing. But, it needs to be protected.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering The Victim’s Story” Mari J. Matsuda addresses the topic of hate speech, and the legal rights surrounding it. She argues for the implementation of legal restrictions on hate speech. She makes the theoretical arguments that hate speech can be a causative factor for legitimate harm to individuals; she justifies the need for restrictions on hate speech by citing the various harm that can be conducted by individual that possess such speech. She claims hate speech can cause: psychological effects, internalization which in turn leads to low self-esteem, violence and discrimination, alteration in the mind of others and a feeling of not being protected by a governing body or exclusion from a community.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We all are entitled to freedom of speech but what is it when freedom of speech turns into a hate crime. Begging the question could be used as the logical fallacy with this article. Freedom of Speech is our constitutional right. Freedom of speech is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or community to articulate one's opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or sanction. People will continue to express themselves no matter how anyone else feels about the comments.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most controversial speech that is often protected by the First Amendment is hate speech. Hate speech is "speech that offense, threatens, or insults groups based on race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability, or other traits (americanbar.org). " If hate speech insights lawless action or violence, then it is not protected. Otherwise people have the freedom to demean others and use offensive language as they please. Other restrictions to freedom of speech include speech that disturbs the educational environment, promotes lawless action or violence, or infringes on the rights of another individual; these are unprotected speech (Is Freedom of Speech an Absolute…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Overtime the Supreme Court has carved out different categories of speech. The Courts have established some speech to be totally protected by the First Amendment, some speech to not be protected by the First Amendment, and some speech to be subjected to different tests and standards to determine whether or not they are protected by the First Amendment. There is sort of this set hierarchy of different classes of speech from that of which is most protected to that of which is least protected. Speech that is subject to the prohibition without violating the First Amendment is speech that is deemed to be absolutely lacking in any type of value. Basically, the Courts have determined that some speech is just valueless and contributes nothing to our…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Our constitution’s first amendment does not only protect free speech. The people have a right to peaceful protest, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Protest is one of the roots to democracy, people have the right to stand up for what they believe in. We do not have the right to say whatever we want with no consequences though. The “Fighting Words Clause” states that “Words which would likely make the person whom they are addressed commit an act of violence.…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Discussion 12.2 Question #1 The Supreme Court should in fact adopt a more narrow view of First Amendment speech protection in an effort to possibly curb hate crimes that may be associated with such speech. Unfortunately end of the Supreme Court hate speech is protected as long as it does not prevent an intent or an immediate threat to an individual. In the regards to the Westboro Baptist Church those individuals who are protesting especially at a funeral of a fallen soldier may not exhibit any type of threat but unfortunately is not respecting those loved ones attending the funeral. In addition to, the people who are exhibiting these signs are still encouraging a sort of disrespect which could ultimately lead to violence.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People who agree with the creation of speech laws simply do not have a proper sense of American freedoms. Americans are often touted as being ignorant and blunt in some regards, but at least we have a very strong cultural foundation in freedom of speech unlike some countries in Europe who have very strong hate speech laws that could land them in jail if they say something that is deemed as offensive. These countries will ultimately come to realize the problems with these laws and the people living within these countries will yearn for such beautiful freedoms that our constitution provides us. Therefore, it is clear to see why our society should take this topic very seriously, and we should not cooperate with anyone who try’s to limit our freedom of expression in anyway whatsoever, and if people don’t respect that than they have the right to form an argument against it, because their right to free speech is…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hate crimes are something that are carried out on a daily basis, and have been all throughout our history, even though the term “hate crime” was not established until the 1980s (The Federal Bureau of Investigation). Historically this has included bias crimes against Blacks, Jews, Native Americans and essentially every new immigrant group that has entered the United States in mass numbers. It is something that has no boarders and is happening all over the world. Hate crimes, are “acts of bigotry directed towards marginalized and vulnerable communities [which] are part of our historical fabric, rooted in the widespread and often culturally accepted demonization of the Other…”(Chakraborti 2010: 1). These acts can target or be motivated by an individual’s…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Firstly, law makers are taking hate crimes seriously. For example, Anthony Faiola, journalist with Washington Post, shares Germany wants to pass a bill to force social media site to remove fake news that encourages hate, or they will be force to pay a fine up to $53,000,000 (Faiola). Thus, this point proves law makers are creating new legislation for the prevention of hate crimes. Secondly, there are many things that are hate inciting. For instance, Faiola, reports these social media outlets will have 24 hours to remove the post that include hate speech, child pornography, and incitements of terrorism.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the government has power to decide what type of speech is considered hate speech, they have the power to control speech altogether. The current vague restrictions on freedoms should be revised so that there are clear and defined limits under which freedoms can be restricted by the…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hate Crime

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    However, according to the US president, Donald Trump, and his statements “’Racism is evil’ And those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans” (Keneally, 2017). With Stormfront’s website, they allow the user to sign up as a user and put a discussion board to fill with hatred against other groups. More serious enough, some of the Stormfront users even commit murdered because of their hate. As for the hate-crime legislation to be controversial in the United States, it is a free country for people to speak of what they want and how they wanted.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America is no longer the land of the free. Under the First Amendment, the citizens of the United States are guaranteed many freedoms, including the freedom of speech. However, this right has become more limited over the past years. Not everyone has the same beliefs, but this should not prevent citizens from freely expressing their First Amendment rights.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays