Framers 3/5 Compromise

Improved Essays
Since the Framers began writing the Constitution in 1787 to govern our great nation, Americans had been avoiding an ugly truth. Slavery had been in American since the colonization of Jamestown in 1619 because indentured servants had become too expensive to bring over from England to do their work. The colonists’ only option for survival was to bring slaves over to help with the hard labor no one else wanted to do or could do. When the slaves came, they gave the colonists a chance at living. They helped with the tobacco crop and rice. Since the Revolutionary war in 1783 however, many colonists in the north believed that slavery was not as important as it used to be. In the northern states they did not need the slaves as much anymore. The slaves in the north did not …show more content…
While most of the elite owned some slaves, they did not agree with it. They could not see slavery being abolished because of how much it helped the economy. To keep the nation untied, they introduced compromises and acts to be passed by congress. The first of these being the 3/5 Compromise. The Framers had a perfect opportunity to end slavery while writing a new document to govern the people and states but they choose to avoid it. In some ways they had no choice but to avoid it because they felt like compromises on slavery were the price for the support of southern delegates for a strong central government. In the Constitution they included the 3/5 compromise. In this compromise it said that every slave in each state would be counted as 3/5 of a person when counting the population. This was important for the southern states because they did not have as many free people as the north did. So if they were to have this compromise, they could compete in terms of numbers. After the compromise the south felt like they could support this new document because to them that was a fair trade for a stronger central

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This though had nothing to do with actual slavery laws, this compromise was actually done to bring the south and north together to finish the Constitution. Later on though the Fugitive Slave Law was added, and forbid new slaves in the new states, but also stated that if slaves were to runaway that they would be returned. Some historians believe though that without this compromise our country could have gone in a different direction, separating the north and the south who would form their own countries and maybe even sparing the lives of hundreds of thousands of people. This did though eventually lead to the civil war and was one of the major contributors in starting the war to end slavery. Before the end though they still had to discuss the ins and outs of the slave trade, and if slaves were property and allowed to be taxed.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Edmund Morgan, an American historian and a previous history professor at Yale University, unveils how slavery was able to exist in America while liberty was held at the highest of standards in his journal Slavery and Freedom: The American Paradox. After sifting through the stories of our nations founding fathers and most important men of the American Revolution his discovers that, unlike most other historians, the fopaux we call slavery did not begin as a racist act. Morgan also discovered that while many write off the founding fathers and the original colonists as hypocrites for wanting to live in a free world while depriving others of their liberty that’s not an accurate name to describe them. And throughout Slavery and Freedom: The American Paradox Edmund Morgan explains his realization with the world.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America's history is plagued by scores of controversies and tough decisions made by crafty lawmen. One of the greatest controversies, perhaps, is the issue of slavery, for which thousands upon thousands of men fought and died. Many opposed slavery morally, and some even economically, but everyone had their own opinions on it. The North, however, took action on slavery with laws like the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the Compromise of 1850. These two acts harbor a host of moral dilemmas and make many people wonder just what the politicians who wrote them were thinking; however, these bills, along with other bills, helped to stop slavery in its tracks.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the late 18th century, the Constitution of the United States was ratified and the unification of the union along with it. Although the Constitution was created to produce order and unity, the nation was split into two by the mid-19th century. After a vast amount of territories being brought into the union due to the nation 's’ Manifest Destiny, the issue of slavery became the center of politics. The cause of such political and social chaos was the fact that the Constitution had not specifically addressed the issue of slavery and what was to be done about it. It’s consequences were that the nation had felt it’s repercussions years later.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Northerners were not the only ones willing to give slaves their freedom it was also the British! British was also willing to free slaves if they fought with them in their side in the war. But in the end the British nor Americans wanted slaves to win their freedom for a social change but just simply because they wanted to win the war. But surprisingly a lot of the founding fathers did not agree with slavery but did not want to abolish it at the time because it seemed too radical to do then. One of the founding fathers who did not agree with slavery was Alexander Hamilton because he realized that the slaves wanted to be free and independent just like the Americans wanted to be free and independent from Great Britain.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under the Articles of Confederation, written in 1777, the United States of America was in dire need of a strong centralized power and a more structured government. 55 delegates rallied to this need and started the Philadelphia Convention, where the motive was to form a better government that would meet the needs of its people. With this motive in mind, the Constitution of the United States was drafted, but there was still a long road till it was signed into law in 1788. In order to make the Constitution legitimate, it would need to be ratified by all 13 states. Combining all the needs of each colony was an intricate compromise, but it was these compromises that made it acceptable by so many.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Framers debated over the issue during the foundation of America because the Chesapeake wanted the slaves to count as part of the population for House representation, but the New England colonies thought the idea was unjust. The Three-Fifths Compromise was the agreed upon solution, which allowed a state to count three fifths of each Black person in determining political representation in the House. This shows that opposition to slavery was present since 1776. The opposition to slavery grew from there eventually culminating in the division between North, the free states, and South, the slave states, for the Civil War. Opposition to slavery grew dramatically from the time period of 1776 to 1852 because of political decisions, social reforms, and technological advances.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chandra Manning’s “What this Cruel War was over” poses the question of what the Civil War was fought over. She then introduces the argument that the war was undeniably over slavery. Using the letters, diaries and newspapers of soldiers who lived and fought during the civil war Manning explains the ways in which slavery and race relations influences the men who volunteered and fought in the civil war. Manning begins her book with three quotations that back up her argument.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hajira Kayani Professor Wathen History 1301 21 Nov 2016 How has slavery affected the West and the Westward Expansion of America? Slavery was present since the American Revolution, and played a huge profitable factor in many lives even before people packed up and moved to the west. Owners, usually whites owned slaves that helped them produce, harvest and work through their systems to earn money.…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the civil war, the states was separate with their own rule of living. The north was full of free state and the south was full of slave states. In this country, slaves was necessary for making money. Yet, they treat them as they was not human even in the free states. The north made a thing called the union with will bring everyone together but, the south didn't want to be apart of it.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However this proposal was denied by the smaller states that feared and a strong central government. Slavery seemed to be an important issue when getting the approval of every state. States like South Carolina, “Carolina, wanted the convention’s assurances that the slave trade could continue, at least for a time, and that the Africans or Caribbean blacks brought to America would not be considered taxable imports”(pg. 113). After debating and enjoying the 4th of July, the Connecticut Compromise was presented that made compromises like the ⅗ compromise for slaves. This helped bring more universal support for the compromise of a stronger government.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Three-Fifths Compromise was an agreement reached by the 1787 Constitutional Convention that determined how slaves would be counted in order to settle state representation and taxation for the federal government. Large-slave states, predominantly in the south, wanted black slaves to be counted as full persons along with the free whites in the population. The South craved power; however, it did not want to be taxed on the slaves which were considered property. Meanwhile, northern states opposed counting slaves because it would take away from their representation in the House.…

    • 137 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    By reducing the rights of slaves and giving an overwhelming majority of power to the southern states in the House of Representatives through the three-fifths clause, it has become clear that the early American viewpoint was that we needed to keep slavery for as long as we can. As slave labor being the number one source of plantation workers in the south, by removing them entirely, the income once obtained by these landowners would be decreased siverly, and the north knew it. By removing slavery from the early American lifestyle, the economic boost we were going through would drastically decrease from where they…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, Abraham Lincoln’s election as president was a huge blow to the southern community, as it made them nervous he would eventually abolish slavery. They considered this a threat to their luxury of enjoying the profit of slavery. Although Lincoln was clear about his opposition of slavery he also admitted he had not intention of messing with the South’s slave system. For example, Lincoln said, “I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists (Hine, 2014).” Be that as it may, the South was not convinced.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The South was as secure in their conviction that slavery was a proper institution as the Minutemen who turned the British back at the Old North Bridge were in theirs. The insulation of the South allowed these convictions to thrive without serious opposition in local communities. With everyone thinking and therefore voting the same way it was easy to keep slavery alive for decades. Insomuch as they believed the proslavery position was unfounded in reality putting forward idealized and sometimes fantastical ideas of Southern society and slave holding. The slave’s perspective was very much real where even in the best position slaves still felt the fear of sale and control by whites.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays