Three-Fifths Compromise: 1787 United States Constitutional Convention

Improved Essays
The Three-Fifths Compromise-Article 1-Section 2 was reached between delegates from the southern states and the northern states during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The Three-Fifths Compromise was a debate over how slaves would be counted when determining a state’s total population. It was important to know what the total population was for legislative representation and taxing purposes. The population number would determine the number of seats that a state would have in the United States House of Representatives for the next ten years.
Constitution Analysis Essay In 1787 the Three-Fifths Compromise was enacted. James Wilson of Pennsylvania proposed the Three-Fifths Compromise as a way to gain the support of the south

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    When the United States had just declared their independence, it was clear that governmental structure needed to be established. In 1777, the Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation, which all states would ratify by 1781. The Articles of Confederation would prove to be a weak constitution, giving too much power to the states and not having a strong enough central government. This realization led to several changes being made until a new framework was implemented. The Constitution established a better relationship between central and state governments, while making sure that no form of government would become too powerful.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Missouri Compromise Dbq

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Prior to the time of the Missouri compromise, there were an equal number of slave states to free states thus there was an equal balance of power in congress. Once Missouri had applied for admission into the union there was instant disapproval from the northern territories for they had thought that the south already had a substantial amount of power. The Missouri compromise was a way to balance congress of free and slave states. The compromise itself was passed in 1820 giving Missouri the title of a slave state and Maine the title of a free state. Therefore it settled a rising dispute between the slave and free territories.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I thought that the 3/5ths compromise was a fair solution to the dilemma that surrounded how we should count slaves. This is because although slaves are people, they are also property. They work for their masters, and they could be sold from person to person. But because they can think and aren’t irrational animals, they should be also considered as people. Although it wasn’t completely fair to the slaves and states, it was fair and necessary to make sure the Southern states had supported the Constitution.…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Section 8

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This was concluded by the Great Compromise in which would create the House of Representatives and the senate in which each state received 2 votes. Another struggle to create a better Constitution was the â…— compromise made in which due to slave states proposing that there slave would count for the population in which they would make it that out of five slaves three would count as citizens. They would also deny the trading of slaves in 1807 as a law. It would also make 9 out of 13 states needed in order to ratify the…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The great compromise allowed both large and small states agree to the constitution without the congress having power. The small population states wanted congress with an equal representation from all states. But the lager populated wanted a congress, representation, and also the number of residents of each state (Doc 4&6). That wasn't the only problem that was going on, between the northern and the southern states their was the three-fifths compromise. The three-fifth compromise was a dispute over if slaves should be counted for as a person or not.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the Missouri Compromise there was a lot of tension between the North and South because of slavery. Though it became even more heated after the Missouri’s 1819 request for admission into the Union as a slave state, which threatened the balance between slave and free states. The reason why the balance was disrupted was because before the request from Missouri there were an even amount of slave and free states. As well as, it would set a precedent for congressional consensus to the increase of slavery. So, to help ease the tension between the states Congress created a two-part compromise, which is known as the Missouri Compromise.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However this proposal was denied by the smaller states that feared and a strong central government. Slavery seemed to be an important issue when getting the approval of every state. States like South Carolina, “Carolina, wanted the convention’s assurances that the slave trade could continue, at least for a time, and that the Africans or Caribbean blacks brought to America would not be considered taxable imports”(pg. 113). After debating and enjoying the 4th of July, the Connecticut Compromise was presented that made compromises like the ⅗ compromise for slaves. This helped bring more universal support for the compromise of a stronger government.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1787, politicians at the Constitutional Convention created two compromises to address the population gap between the North and South (PN 187). Since representation in the House of Representatives depended on population, the Northern states received significantly more delegates due to the dramatically larger populations. In an effort to balance the representation in the House, the convention created the Three-Fifths Compromise, which counted each slave as three-fifths of a person. In exchange, the South agreed to abolish the slave trade on January 1, 1808, which signaled the progressive, gradual decline of slavery in the South. The Compromise of 1787 successfully relieved sectional conflict until 1820, when tensions arose over the land acquired from the Louisiana Purchase in 1803.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an era where slavery was viewed as a profitable and reputable source of wealth, income, power, and an economic driving force, divisions amongst opinions added fuel to the flame for an unavoidable conflict to ignite. The Missouri Compromise came about for views, even within a time with which like-mindedness was prized and raised to the highest of glories on a pedestal, vastly varied on the issue of slavery and its seemingly rather loosely tied boundaries. With two opposing sides, the North for the removal of slavery and the South in favor of its continued existence -- territorial issues were heavy on the mind. Though often revered as being a more verbal form of compromise that laid out specific boundaries within the states, or two states…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Priscilla Etim HIST 1301 Professor James Adams July 26, 2017 The Great Compromise: The Ideals and Values of a Growing Nation The Great Compromise of 1787 is the compromise or the settled agreement of the dispute that erupted due to conflicting views and objectives presented from the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey plan. The purpose of these plans was to create proposed changes to the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The New Constitution

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    When the Constitutional Convention became deadlocked over the matter of legislative voting, Sherman proposed a system analogous to one he had advocated before as a delegate to the Continental Congress in 1776 (Keith, 2006). The compromise provided for representation in the House of Representatives as per population and in the Senate by equal numbers for each state. Finally, the Sherman compromise was adopted on July 16, 1787 by five states to four. This not only served to save the convention that was set to fall apart, but ultimately provided the effort to resolve the other issues yet to be decided (Keith,…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Passed by Congress in may of 1854, the Kansas Nebraska Act may be the most significant of the Pre-Civil War compromises. It admitted the Kansas and Nebraska as states, but rather than decide whether the territories would become slave or non-slave states based on their location in relation to the 36’ 30° line, they were allowed to choose for themselves. Kansas and Nebraska were not the only ones allowed to decide though, each territory was allowed to choose for itself if it would be a slave or non-slave state. This allowing of territories to choose slave or non-slave is called popular sovereignty. In popular sovereignty the people of the territory vote to decide if they will become a slave state or a non-slave state.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The History of the Constitutional Convention In 1787, Congress realized that states governing themselves would leave the nation powerless when faced with another war. The United States had adopted the Articles of Confederation a decade prior, but the system wasn’t working. Each state was able to govern itself, and they didn’t have to abide by any regulations set by the federal government. The United States has a federalist government, meaning that the citizens are held to the laws of the state and the nation, but the federal government was left nearly powerless to enforce any type of authority. Congress had no way of being able to regulate commerce and no authority to emplace taxes.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays