A fertility clinic has been offering preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to test for early-onset genetic disorders that are serious. The embryos that are found to be free of any serious genetic abnormalities can then be selected to be implanted in the woman. There are two families requesting two different uses of PGD, one wants to use the testing to pick the embryos that would have a better memory and self-discipline, and the other is a deaf couple wanting to pick an embryo that has congenital deafness so the child can experience the world the same way they do. My recommendation for a policy to be put in place for the fertility clinic would be to continue the testing for serious early-onset genetic disorders but not add testing and selection
…show more content…
Those who may have this objection believe that if we withhold the possibility of a better life or the possibility of a higher skill set we would be neglecting our children. In the reading, “Genetic Interventions and the Ethics of Enhancement of Human Beings” by Julian Savulescu, Savulescu gives the case of Neglectful Parents who have a child born with amazing intellect but needs a simple, cheap dietary supplement to sustain the child’s intellect but the parents neglect the diet for their child and the child’s amazing intellect becomes normal(Savulescu, 820).The author here believes that the Neglectful Parents are wrong for preventing their child of something great. In the case of PGD testing, if we don’t chose the embryos with the best potential that the parents want then we are neglecting the future child. Utilitarianism is the principle that brings about the greatest amount of happiness(9). Utilitarians would say that being able to choose what you want your child to be would be the best way to bring about the most …show more content…
The children who don’t have any chosen traits would be disadvantaged throughout their lives because of the children who had their traits chosen for what their parents wanted in a child. The children without chosen traits would be at an unfair advantage to the children with chosen traits in school, work and life. “Most people with conditions such as spina bifida, achondroplasia, Down syndrome, and many other mobility and sensory impairments perceive themselves as healthy, not sick, and describe their conditions as givens of their lives--- the equipment with which they meet the world.” (Asch, 611) Asch wanted to know what individuals who have these kind of conditions felt or thought about themselves, if they felt like they were disabled in the world, and found many didn’t think of themselves any different. These people were not chosen to be born or avoided, they were given an equal chance and they feel they have a purpose in the world. The children who are chosen to be taller would become NBA players over the more average sized people, and the children who were chosen to have a better memory would do better in school and that would lead to them getting better jobs in the future over kids who were born without the chosen memory
Those who may have this objection believe that if we withhold the possibility of a better life or the possibility of a higher skill set we would be neglecting our children. In the reading, “Genetic Interventions and the Ethics of Enhancement of Human Beings” by Julian Savulescu, Savulescu gives the case of Neglectful Parents who have a child born with amazing intellect but needs a simple, cheap dietary supplement to sustain the child’s intellect but the parents neglect the diet for their child and the child’s amazing intellect becomes normal(Savulescu, 820).The author here believes that the Neglectful Parents are wrong for preventing their child of something great. In the case of PGD testing, if we don’t chose the embryos with the best potential that the parents want then we are neglecting the future child. Utilitarianism is the principle that brings about the greatest amount of happiness(9). Utilitarians would say that being able to choose what you want your child to be would be the best way to bring about the most …show more content…
The children who don’t have any chosen traits would be disadvantaged throughout their lives because of the children who had their traits chosen for what their parents wanted in a child. The children without chosen traits would be at an unfair advantage to the children with chosen traits in school, work and life. “Most people with conditions such as spina bifida, achondroplasia, Down syndrome, and many other mobility and sensory impairments perceive themselves as healthy, not sick, and describe their conditions as givens of their lives--- the equipment with which they meet the world.” (Asch, 611) Asch wanted to know what individuals who have these kind of conditions felt or thought about themselves, if they felt like they were disabled in the world, and found many didn’t think of themselves any different. These people were not chosen to be born or avoided, they were given an equal chance and they feel they have a purpose in the world. The children who are chosen to be taller would become NBA players over the more average sized people, and the children who were chosen to have a better memory would do better in school and that would lead to them getting better jobs in the future over kids who were born without the chosen memory