Genetic Modification In Human Genetic Engineering

Superior Essays
Definition/science of genetic modification in embryos

In human beings, genetic modification or engineering is the editing of genes. Genes are segments of DNA and are responsible for our physical characteristics. Genes are all heritable characteristics such as coloration, height, some intelligence factors and predisposition or immunity to particular diseases and physical and mental genetic defects. Human germline manipulation is the intentional altering of DNA in gametes, which are the sex cells in humans. The changes that will result from manipulating germ cells will eventually become a natural part of the human reproduction system and the altered genes will be passed on from generation to generation. The science behind germline manipulation
…show more content…
This process is known as microinjection. A similar method called Bio-ballistics can be used to achieve the same end goal of ultimately engineering a healthy embryo. A less-than-cell-sized metal silver is coated with therapeutic DNA and precisely shot or injected into a target cell. What makes germline engineering unique is heritability. Passing on altered genes that can ultimately eliminate diseases such as cancer, cystic fibrosis, and even Alzheimer’s disease can improve the quality of human life exponentially. These newly acquired genes can be modified back to their original configuration or engineered ever further to achieve the desired result many generations later. Germline manipulation has sparked an enormous amount of controversy and scientists and people everywhere have great arguments for and against germline manipulation.

Pros

One of the biggest reasons why scientists are pushing for the advancement of germline manipulation is to end diseases. Human genetic engineering was devoted to helping end the spread of diseases, as well as genetic defects and
…show more content…
The biggest argument people have against genetic modification is that God should have the ultimate power, and genetically engineering human beings to be different than the way God created them is impious. (Arnold) This side of the argument suggests that it is not up to human beings to advance the human race. Even with genetic corruption, people were created in the image of God, therefore changing that image would be wrong. Some are against germline manipulation from a scientific standpoint rather than religious beliefs. They believe that because genetic modification is performed by human beings, mistakes that some engineers make will be passed on to future generations, ultimately leaving the human race in a worse situation than before. Some believe that giving parents the option of genetically engineering their baby will result in eugenics driven by egoism. People might take advantage of germline manipulation by creating embryos that will be their own idea of what is perfect, thus objectifying and commodifying children. Some opposers even say that because these embryos will not have a say in whether they want to be modified or not, their rights will be taken away. Furthermore, regulating laws ensuring that genetic modification is used only for the correction of genuinely medical genetic conditions as opposed to enhancing a child’s appearance will be nearly impossible. Rich parents will use

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Genetic modification is the elimination of a certain gene containing undesirable trait and adding another gene containing the desired trait. The process includes getting the desirable material from a donor and not from the parents. Parents now can get all the characteristics they desire in their babies. They can also eliminate certain health problems the child might inherit from his/her parents. Genetic modification and manipulation has become a controversial topic since it has ethical and religious concerns.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is Human Cloning Possible

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Instead of creating clones that have to experience the effects of the imperfections, scientists should focus more on improving the lives of people by using other ways that does not include ethics or does not cause harm to others. These scientists are making the clones suffer through unneeded complications. Head states in the article, “Should human cloning be banned?”, “Scientists generally agree that it would be irresponsible to clone a human being until cloning has been perfected, given that the cloned human would probably face serious, and ultimately terminal, health issues.” It is impetuous for scientists to continue cloning because the babies that were made are alive and have their own feelings. They should not be forced to live with health issues their entire life because of our imperfect experiments. Scientists only want to create clones in order to have better organ donors.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If this was to occur, it means the good cells would be damaged and cancerous changes may happen. On the other hand strength of this approach explained by The scientists who are exploring genetic engineering may have good intentions however, according to Kanapton (2015) it can still lead to an ethical disasters as it enables parents to design their own babies. On the other hand, Skladman (2011) stresses that genetic engineering can assist saving a person from a deadly…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stem cells are believed to possess the ability to replace cells the cannot regenerate which can lead for treatment of heart, nerve, and brain disease that involve not enough cells performing properly. There is opposition to the idea of genetic engineering as many people think that, if done in humans, people will be able to choose traits of their baby right away. Stem cells are also controversial as one of the main sources of them is embryonic tissue which some see as a potential baby. The most prominent argument against genetic engineering is the idea of genetically engineered crops and food. Many people are opposed to this idea because scientists are unsure of the effects of genetically engineered crops.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Who are we to take away that right to our uniqueness? We are also taking away our own natural ability to provide a better chance of survival by the genetic differences provided by sexual reproduction. Many arguments have been made in the past on why cloning is ethical, but in retrospect they are wrong. In this case the pro’s do not outweigh the con’s. Arguments have been made stating that cloning could save lives, but it would jeopardize many more than it would save the scientists from the article “The Cloning Debate.…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ESCR (embryonic stem cell research) is argued to be a motive that is unfair as well as the debate on whether it should be declared illegal due to the possible death, pain and unfair treatment to all involved ("Ten Problems with Embryonic Stem Cell Research."). It explains the reasons and beliefs of the other party. An additional concern of the opposing part is that fact that, "Humans should not be trying to play God and some argue that stem cell research in the far future can lead to knowledge on how to clone humans. It is hard to say whether this is true, but we have seen devastating consequences of other research-programs, even with good intentions, such as nuclear research (Stem Cell Research-Pros and Cons). The quote explains the human fear behind the matter of stem cell research.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This group believes that genetic modification could possibly be a threat to not only humans but also to environmental health. According to Greenpeace International, “Biological diversity must be protected and respected as the global heritage of humankind, and one of our world 's fundamental keys to survival.” (2) The unknown dangers and possible outcomes of altering human DNA is often unsettling to people against genetic engineering. Other arguments against genetic engineering are based on a moral and religious standpoint. Genetic mutation can be seen as ”playing god.” Advocates say that no one has the power to manipulate the almighty. They believe that all humans are born as they were meant to be in the way of god.…

    • 1326 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The dream of eradicating illnesses just got one step closer as scientists in China have successfully modified the genes of a human embryo. This news reverberated throughout the scientific community and hailed as the next revolution of medicine as it will allow us to eradicate devastating genetic illnesses such as Down syndrome, Anemia and Parkinson’s (Tarantola). As the name indicates, genetically engineering embryos is the manipulation of the human genome, in order to improve the embryo’s DNA, and subsequently prevent devastating diseases that the individual would be otherwise susceptible to. As such, the genetic modification of embryos would allow humanity to prosper, free from some of the most serious diseases that haunt mankind. This attempt…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    As for cons, many parents end up giving the baby for adoption after its born, it's a violation of the baby's rights, it isn't error-free. It can lead to death even before its born, not affordable, take away the child's personality, and they could end up removing the healthy genes from development and growth. So it is a nonguaranteed…

    • 2267 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This technology potentially paves the way for future scientists to alter the human gene pool by eliminating common illnesses and diseases caused by genetic variations. So with CRISPR, bioengineers could possibly eradicate certain genetic mutations and even correct others. Hopefully, by genetically altering human DNA with the use of CRISPR, the benefits of successful DNA splicing will open new doors to treating genetic illnesses and even eradicating diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. Other scientists, such as Antonio Regalado in particular, also believes more research as well as more rigorous testing should be conducted before using CRISPR on living humans as opposed to cells in a Petri dish. “New technologies, combined with scientists, ethicists and legal experts could devise a way to change humanity, as we know it.” (Regalado…

    • 1080 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics