You are correct in saying that execution is flawed because it leaves the margin of hope for error. However, this margin of error applies to all crimes and sentences. False imprisonment could happen to any innoccent person for stealing a sticker to being a serial killer. Their is always a slim chance of inadequacy in everysystem, but I truly believe that America has the most just court system. That is why they allow inmates to appeal from deathrow in favor of innocence or lessening of sentence. If there was no death row and the government just put them in prison for life they would lose libtery, property and (in essence) life. Point being that neither is a favorable outcome if the system fails. However, for the overwhelming majority
You are correct in saying that execution is flawed because it leaves the margin of hope for error. However, this margin of error applies to all crimes and sentences. False imprisonment could happen to any innoccent person for stealing a sticker to being a serial killer. Their is always a slim chance of inadequacy in everysystem, but I truly believe that America has the most just court system. That is why they allow inmates to appeal from deathrow in favor of innocence or lessening of sentence. If there was no death row and the government just put them in prison for life they would lose libtery, property and (in essence) life. Point being that neither is a favorable outcome if the system fails. However, for the overwhelming majority